British teachers encouraged to teach lessons on porn - "porn is hugely diverse – it's not all bad"

[tau]

[QUOTE=Zeneros;40434741]You cant find out all your exciting fetishes with just magazines. Go on the internet and fap to the first thing that comes up.[/QUOTE]

The Google Chrome about:blank page? :v:

[Zethereal]

grab your dick and double click for porn porn porn

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kV7ou6pl5wU[/media]

[carcarcargo]

[QUOTE=RichyZ;40434778]its to help quell the taboo around porn itself in society, and possibly deflect any hardcore conservatives who try to ban it[/QUOTE]

What exactly can you teach kids to make them think otherwise when it's all opinion any way? If a kid likes porn, he'll like porn. If a kid doesn't for whatever reason then he won't like porn. There isn't anything to educate people on in regards to it.

[Coffee]

[QUOTE=Key_in_skillee;40434452]There are a lot of reasons parents tell their kids not to look at porn (I was told it "objectifies women" for example) but really the best reason is that, with the internet, if you look for porn you're going to run into a lot of disgusting and horrifying shit. If you must look at porn, you're much better off with a dirty magazine and not going any further than that.[/QUOTE]

Or you know, you can just know what you're doing and not run into any of that shit.

[Zeneros]

[QUOTE=NeonpieDFTBA;40434936]The Google Chrome about:blank page? :v:[/QUOTE]

Pff, lightweight.

[Inspecter]

[QUOTE=alien_guy;40433374]Implying most porn is 'bad'?[/QUOTE]

Well German scat porn is bad, as well as any other porn with disgusting fetishes.

[cecilbdemodded]

"Okay class, if Simon can stay erect for 13 minutes and it takes each girl 5 minutes to reach orgasm, how many girls can Simon please? Show your work."

[tau]

[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;40435905]"Okay class, if Simon can stay erect for 13 minutes and it takes each girl 5 minutes to reach orgasm, how many girls can Simon please? Show your work."[/QUOTE]
6. Simon has 3 cocks.

[Ravenholme]

[QUOTE=carcarcargo;40434566]And that needs lesson time because? Honestly my school wasted enough time on garbage lessons as it was.[/QUOTE]

I actually suspect it's to introduce them to amateur pornography which often tends to be more intimate. A lot of kids try and emulate professional pornography and that, for all it's pornographic nature, is not exactly a manual of how to have good sex with an actual partner, yet is often treated as such.

Wellp. Awkward page king, get.

[lordcrypto]

[QUOTE=Craigewan;40437884]I actually suspect it's to introduce them to amateur pornography which often tends to be more intimate. A lot of kids try and emulate professional pornography and that, for all it's pornographic nature, is not exactly a manual of how to have good sex with an actual partner, yet is often treated as such.

Wellp. Awkward page king, get.[/QUOTE]
actually that kinda makes sense

[Ravenholme]

[QUOTE=LordCrypto;40437905]actually that kinda makes sense[/QUOTE]

I think so, I think it also explains the "Not all bad" quote in the title. Porn, in terms of it's relevance to sex ed, is generally bad - because it's not all that relevant in educating people how to have good sex with a partner (actually, objectively, a lot of the practices in the vast majority of porn are BAD for having enjoyable sex with your partner) - because it's focused on exaggerative sexuality and being pornographic in nature.

However, not all porn is like that, the great diversity of it does mean that there is actual intimate pornography out there, generally from the amateur scene. And that stuff might be worth introducing kids to in sex ed so that they don't encounter only the vast morass of pornography that is bad from the educational standpoint so that they don't end up treating their first partner like shit they see in some BangBros flick. Also a lot of professional pornography focuses on choosing male actors with huge dicks and hugely attractive females, which can lead to unrealistic expectations and self-esteem issues.

[RoadOfGirl]

good source

[Ravenholme]

[QUOTE=RoadOfGirl;40438067]good source[/QUOTE]

Someone posted a link to BBC article saying the same thing on the previous page.

So yes, good source.