[QUOTE=Orckrast;30715262]am allowed to post against this? if not I'll be quiet....[/QUOTE]
If you don't have a completely stupid reason and actually ATTEMPT to bring in a twinkling of logic, then you can consider posting.
Otherwise :getoutfrogfuckI'mtoolazytorememberit:
[QUOTE=Orckrast;30715262]am allowed to post against this? if not I'll be quiet....[/QUOTE]
Go right ahead
I can't wait for this one
[QUOTE=Orckrast;30715262]am allowed to post against this? if not I'll be quiet....[/QUOTE]
You are allowed to go against whatever you like, just don't be surprised when we disagree. Nobody is saying you can't post, hell, quite the opposite.
[QUOTE=amute;30715169]Overpopulation isn't that much of a problem.[/QUOTE]
It is when we're burning all the water and oil, and are eventually going to run out, and when the poor and sick make more babies than the elites.
you probably don't think about water being limited as an issue because you live in an area with a seemingly infinite supply, cheap, but trust me, it's an issue. By water, I mean clean, clear, drinkable water. Oil is an obvious one.
You'd need to be a total idiot to not understand that the lower the population, the less usable of finite supplies, and thus, greater the global efficiency.
[editline]26th June 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Orckrast;30715262]am allowed to post against this? if not I'll be quiet....[/QUOTE]
You can.
but be ready for me with an axe. At least your being polite though.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/RAaGO.png[/img]
ho hum
[QUOTE=Sourcream&onion;30692523]I'm okay with this, it was an excellent movie. Also I can honestly see Glenn Beck literally exploding like the girl in the movie when he finds out about this.[/QUOTE]
Except for the fact that Michael J. Fox was the cameraman, it was okay of a film.
Who gives a fuck how close it was? The bill passed, good shit occurred this day, rejoice!
Marriage: The formal union of a man and a woman.
I don't care if they get together, but don't call it marriage.
Also, 'Gay' marriage doesn't cut it either because that assumes a gay man and gay woman would like to get married, and therefore makes no sense.
[QUOTE=NotoriousSpy;30729281]Marriage: The formal union of a man and a woman.
I don't care if they get together, but don't call it marriage.
Also, 'Gay' marriage doesn't cut it either because that assumes a gay man and gay woman would like to get married, and therefore makes no sense.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage[/url]
Marriage is a social union or legal contract between people that creates kinship. It is an institution in which interpersonal relationships, usually intimate and sexual, are acknowledged in a variety of ways, depending on the culture or subculture in which it is found. Such a union, often formalized via a wedding ceremony, may also be called matrimony.
[url]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage[/url]
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage <same-sex marriage>
Don't 'make up' definitions to words please. Marriage isn't set in stone to be just man and woman you know, thats stupid.
[quote][IMG]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss166/SebMcMeb123456/Cool%20shit/nothing-is-written-in-stone.jpg[/IMG][/quote]
[QUOTE=NotoriousSpy;30729281]Marriage: The formal union of a man and a woman.
I don't care if they get together, but don't call it marriage.
Also, 'Gay' marriage doesn't cut it either because that assumes a gay man and gay woman would like to get married, and therefore makes no sense.[/QUOTE]
Where does it say marriage is specifically between a man and a woman?
[QUOTE=NotoriousSpy;30729281]Marriage: The formal union of a man and a woman.
I don't care if they get together, but don't call it marriage.
Also, 'Gay' marriage doesn't cut it either because that assumes a gay man and gay woman would like to get married, and therefore makes no sense.[/QUOTE]
Want some herp with your derp or do you have enough of your own?
I don't believe I made it up:
[url]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage[/url].
The second definition DOES say same sex, but like I said, that's the part I disagree with.
I want to move to New York now. I'm not gay, but I'd like to live somewhere not as bigoted.
[QUOTE=NotoriousSpy;30729419]I don't believe I made it up:
[url]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage[/url].
The second definition DOES say same sex, but like I said, that's the part I disagree with.[/QUOTE]
you disagree with a definition so you change it to your benefit.
like a wise duo of men had once said... Sir Tim, and Sir Erick
[I]Great job[/I]
[QUOTE=Tacosheller;30729429]I want to move to New York now. I'm not gay, but I'd like to live somewhere not as bigoted.[/QUOTE]
Enjoy your taxes.
[QUOTE=NotoriousSpy;30729419]I don't believe I made it up:
[url]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage[/url].
The second definition DOES say same sex, but like I said, that's the part I disagree with.[/QUOTE]
lol skewing definitions to your benifit
[QUOTE=J!NX;30726089]It is when we're burning all the water and oil, and are eventually going to run out, and when the poor and sick make more babies than the elites.
you probably don't think about water being limited as an issue because you live in an area with a seemingly infinite supply, cheap, but trust me, it's an issue. By water, I mean clean, clear, drinkable water. Oil is an obvious one.
You'd need to be a total idiot to not understand that the lower the population, the less usable of finite supplies, and thus, greater the global efficiency.[/QUOTE]
This isn't an overpopulation issue, it's just a bad distribution of resources.
[QUOTE=amute;30729499]This isn't an overpopulation issue, it's just a bad distribution of resources.[/QUOTE]
How are we supposed to filter where resources go and don't go when we have so many people?
Communications to places like Haiti are limited, plus transporting all that water means using up fuel, thus money, and since you can only give so much at once, it becomes a very big issue.
It's not as simple as you think you know. The worlds a very complex thing.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30717184]So next time anyone bitches about their country spending their tax money on African aid shut up because you're investing in making food prices cheaper for you in the future[/QUOTE]
Unless it's being siphoned off into corrupt leaders' pockets
[QUOTE=NotoriousSpy;30729419]I don't believe I made it up:
[url]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage[/url].
The second definition DOES say same sex, but like I said, that's the part I disagree with.[/QUOTE]
welp you better stop disagreeing soon
[QUOTE=NotoriousSpy;30729419]I don't believe I made it up:
[url]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage[/url].
The second definition DOES say same sex, but like I said, that's the part I disagree with.[/QUOTE]
Hey buddy.
Fuck you.
[QUOTE=J!NX;30729531]How are we supposed to filter where resources go and don't go when we have so many people?
Communications to places like Haiti are limited, plus transporting all that water means using up fuel, thus money, and since you can only give so much at once, it becomes a very big issue.
It's not as simple as you think you know. The worlds a very complex thing.[/QUOTE]
but the logistics of overpopulation aside, the legality of same sex marriage will not change the number of homosexuals in world in the slightest.
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;30729676]but the logistics of overpopulation aside, the legality of same sex marriage will not change the number of homosexuals in world in the slightest.[/QUOTE]
Nope, not at all. But it'll make the world a little better at least.
I hope I don't hear "More people are going to chose to be homosexuals" though... :frown:
I'm not disagreeing with gay marriage, I'm disagreeing with the term. You guys need to relax a little bit, it's not the end of the world when people disagree.
[QUOTE=NotoriousSpy;30730031]I'm not disagreeing with gay marriage, I'm disagreeing with the term. You guys need to relax a little bit, it's not the end of the world when people disagree.[/QUOTE]
Separate but equal much.
you cant say 'oh i dont like this part of a definition therefore its wrong'
idiot
I didn't say it was wrong, I said I don't like it.
Dum-dum.
[QUOTE=NotoriousSpy;30730233]I didn't say it was wrong, I said I don't like it.
Dum-dum.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=NotoriousSpy;30729419]I don't believe I made it up:
[url]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage[/url].
The second definition DOES say same sex, but like I said, [b]that's the part I disagree with.[/b][/QUOTE]
This is you saying it is wrong
I didn't say it was wrong... I said I don't like it.
For the record, I fully accept that definition of marriage and what it means... But I don't agree with it.
[QUOTE=J!NX;30729531]How are we supposed to filter where resources go and don't go when we have so many people?
Communications to places like Haiti are limited, plus transporting all that water means using up fuel, thus money, and since you can only give so much at once, it becomes a very big issue.
It's not as simple as you think you know. The worlds a very complex thing.[/QUOTE]
There is more than enough renewable resources to go around the world.
The world isn't on fucking fire with people scrambling for resources. We just suck at distributing them. There are many sources of food, water and fuel. People are just too ignorant not to find ways to distribute it. It has nothing to do with over population.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
