• John McCain: USA needs to "pull the trigger" on Iran
    126 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;21360720]the vexing thing isn't that people can hold such contradictory ideas as being furry and conservative, there's countless people with beliefs that don't match up with each other; the real conundrum is how people end up with those two specific sets of contradictory ideas. People can be raised into having unusual, inconsistent belief systems and simply never question them, but conservative-furry isn't one of those. They have to, somewhere down the line, have become a furry while already being a conservative, or vice versa. how does a person make that leap without any warning signs going off[/QUOTE] maybe they are libfurtarian [editline]03:24AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Mexican;21360754]I don't think Iran is building nukes to be hostile. They're probably doing it because once you have one the U.S. leaves you alone.[/QUOTE] that's what I said but noone ever quoted me :frown:
[QUOTE=Siminov;21360710] But yes, We should try to disarm a threatening nation that is creating nukes, because even though there are less of them, they can fall into enemy hands easier.[/QUOTE] what do you mean fall into enemy hands? is iran going to leave their garage door open and some punk kids are going to steal one of their icbms? [QUOTE=Pvt. Ryan;21360759]maybe they are libfurtarian[/QUOTE] why does every portmanteau of "fur" and another word have to be so obnoxious sounding? it's a really simple syllable
[QUOTE=Pvt. Ryan;21360759]that's what I said but noone ever quoted me :frown:[/QUOTE] rated you agree and stuff.
[QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;21360773]what do you mean fall into enemy hands? is iran going to leave their garage door open and some punk kids are going to steal one of their icbms? why does every portmanteau of "fur" and another word have to be so obnoxious sounding[/QUOTE] i think libfurtarian is kinda funny v:smile:v
[QUOTE=Mexican;21360754]I don't think Iran is building nukes to be hostile. They're probably doing it because once you have one the U.S. leaves you alone.[/QUOTE] That could be a good reason, but it is more dangerous because of the terriost actions going on in that region, where it could fall into [B]Al-Qaeda's[/B] hands. [QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;21360773]what do you mean fall into enemy hands? is iran going to leave their garage door open and some punk kids are going to steal one of their icbms?[/QUOTE] Punk kids = Al Qaeda Then yes
[QUOTE=Pvt. Ryan;21360804]i think libfurtarian is kinda funny v:smile:v[/QUOTE] anafurachist is a rather odd one as well.
[QUOTE=Pvt. Ryan;21360804]i think libfurtarian is kinda funny v:smile:v[/QUOTE] it's clever but it would get really grating after a while
[QUOTE=Siminov;21360809]That could be a good reason, but it is more dangerous because of the terriost actions going on in that region, where it could fall into [B]Al-Qaeda's[/B] hands.[/QUOTE] that'll never happen because an angry nuclear detonation would immediately attract hostile intention to Iran this Iranian threat is really overblown and is just fearmongering
[QUOTE=Siminov;21360809]That could be a good reason, but it is more dangerous because of the terriost actions going on in that region, where it could fall into [B]Al-Qaeda's[/B] hands. Punk kids = Al Qaeda Then yes[/QUOTE] It'd be dangerous in any extremists hands.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;21360830]anafurachist is a rather odd one as well.[/QUOTE] probably because it sounds like shit and is a terrible portmanteau
We should also go by my grandma's logic, "nuke every other country"
[QUOTE=Pvt. Ryan;21360852]probably because it sounds like shit and is a terrible portmanteau[/QUOTE] and isn't funny...
Marxist Furminism [b]edit:[/b] Anarcho-Indifurdualism
[QUOTE=Octo pie;21360869]We should also go by my grandma's logic, "nuke every other country"[/QUOTE] They probably wouldn't fit in the microwave.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;21360613]Very well said, and I agree with every word. Iran has made its intentions perfectly clear, [b][highlight]and something needs to be done[/b][/highlight] to prevent them from achieving their goals. If their quest for nuclear weaponry comes to fruition, it is highly probable that they will be used in hostility.[/quote] Why does the US have to do this? You are not the world police. That movie was fictional, and it had puppets in it. [QUOTE=Big Dumb American;21360613]Haha, Alquidea.[/QUOTE] I think I had a ham and cheese Alquidea for lunch the other day, it was delicious
[QUOTE=Mexican;21360754]I don't think Iran is building nukes to be hostile. They're probably doing it because once you have one the U.S. leaves you alone.[/QUOTE] And both their neighbors Iraq and Afghanistan were invaded by the US. So they're probably afraid that the US is coming for them next. I don't blame them.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;21360937]Why does the US have to do this? You are not the world police. That movie was fictional, and it had puppets in it. I think I had a ham and cheese Alquidea for lunch the other day, it was delicious[/QUOTE] I'd prefer if it weren't us. If the United Nations were an organization actually capable of enforcing its sanctions and policies than there wouldn't be in this situation. Unfortunately, they answer their stern warnings with [I]more[/I] stern warnings, and could count their successes on one lawnmower-mangled fist. Eventually somebody actually has to actually step up to the plate do something. Who knows, maybe somebody will come in from left field and save the day- so that America can stop looking like the bad guys for telling homicidal maniacs to stop playing with nuclear weapons. [B]edit[/B] Also leaving us more time to play with puppets.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;21361054]I'd prefer if it weren't us. If the United Nations were an organization actually capable of enforcing its sanctions and policies than there wouldn't be in this situation. Unfortunately, they answer their stern warnings with [I]more[/I] stern warnings, and could count their successes on one lawnmower-mangled fist. Eventually somebody actually has to actually step up to the plate do something. Who knows, maybe somebody will come in from left field and save the day- so that America can stop looking like the bad guys for telling homicidal maniacs to stop playing with nuclear weapons.[/QUOTE] The UN is the united states little bitch. Case and point: Iraq-Iran war.
[QUOTE=Siminov;21360321]It is funny how Obama wants to destroy our nukes, yet there are enemy countries producing them... It is not like Obama is any better. Bet you can't trust them more with your life.[/QUOTE] who on earth are you
whats rope a dope
[QUOTE=CivilProtection;21359763]McCain is a zionist piece of shit who wants the USA to fight Israels wars. Why do people listen to people like him?[/QUOTE]
hi thisispain
[QUOTE=thisispain;21361104]who on earth are you[/QUOTE] a nazifur furvert
[QUOTE=PrismatexV8;21361119]a nazifur furvert[/QUOTE] Furhaps this is true.
[QUOTE=thisispain;21361104]who on earth are you[/QUOTE] Siminov [QUOTE=PrismatexV8;21361119]a nazifur furvert[/QUOTE] :bravo: Keep talking...
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;21361199]Furhaps this is true.[/QUOTE] Further more I find his furvent belief in confurvitism rather furstrating.
[QUOTE=Pvt. Ryan;21359728]-Sanctions don't work; they won't curb Iran's nuclear program and they will only hurt the Iranian populace -Iran's nuclear program dates back to the Shah, and there are a lot of incentives for Iran to develop nuclear power plants. They import a lot of their oil/fuel, and if they shifted more towards nuclear energy, they would free up more of their own oil resources. They are completely entitled to nuclear power if you ask me. -The UN's own weapon inspectors said that Iran is nowhere near being nuclear weapons-capable and is making no effort to try to make weapons. -Basically the only reason Iran is an issue is because Israel has deeply wormed itself into Washington and because we don't like Iran's government. Pakistan is more of a threat to global stability than Iran, given that Pakistan already has nuclear weapons, and it's generally accepted that the Taliban/Islamic extremists operate in Pakistan's border areas. Iran getting nuclear weapons would be better for world peace, in a way. Western/American aggression is predicated on the degree of danger carrying out a war would entail. There was very little danger Iraq posed to America, and therefor it was a better "target". That's why you will never see the US or South Korea strike first on the Korean peninsula: North Korea has nuclear landmines buried on the border and if South Korea got nuked the global economy would be thrown into chaos. If Iran has nukes, then it's safe to say that the US won't touch them. Iran would dare not sell/give nukes to any of its proxies either (like Hezbollah), because if a nuke went off in Israel, then the world would pretty much be forced to respond in some way. In short, Iran just wants nukes (if, of course, that's the route they are going, which is still totally up in the air given all the facts) for their own protection. Iran is entitled to developing nuclear power, because of how much it would help their energy economy. That's just how I see it, given my really amateurish knowledge and research into the subject.[/QUOTE] This And also Iran's missile program is a joke. They photoshop missile launches and shoot turtles and worms and rats and shit into space. They are truly a loser country. Why do we care so much? Answer: Israel.
[img]http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/pictures/20080709IranMissilePhotoshop4.jpg[/img] so pro
Iran is already almost entirely embargoed. Not much we can do will change anything.
Bitch bitch whine whine world police. Sorry, but really?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.