Massive celebrity nudes leak just happened on 4chan. Shuddap about how many people are viewing this
2,051 replies, posted
[QUOTE=LaTrefle;45862857]Theres a thing called paparazzi yknow. Like it or not celebrities pose as nude into magazines every day, just their nipples arent shown.[/QUOTE]
you think the fact that [i]some[/i] celebrities pose semi-nude means that we should see all of their privately hosted pictures?
thats like saying 'well girls have sex too, why can't we just have sex with them when we want!'. you can't justify the removal of privacy or consent.
[QUOTE=The Saiko;45862852]So appearently they found out who the hacker was and he's not a 15 year old.
I don't want to post the information but if you're curious there is a big thread on /b/ with all his infos and how they aquired it.
This guy is gonna be in some deep shit.[/QUOTE]
Knowing that the guy that leaked the 2 pics of S.Johannson took 10 years of prison, I don't want to imagine what's going to happen to him...
[QUOTE=Razumihkin;45862860]are you comparing this to the paparazzi as if its okay?[/QUOTE]
No im meaning these are celebrities, who would pose as nude into any magazine as long as they are in the cover. They dont get affected by this shit. It only gives them more publicity. Normal people who arent in this industry dont like their nudes posted for a reason because their families dont appreciate it, their business carreer dont appreciate it. Celebs stay on top with these stuff. Normals dont.
[QUOTE=LaTrefle;45862881]No im meaning these are celebrities, who would pose as nude into any magazine as long as they are in the cover. They dont get affected by this shit. It only gives them more publicity. Normal people who arent in this industry dont like their nudes posted for a reason because their families dont appreciate it, their business carreer dont appreciate it. Celebs stay on top with these stuff. Normals dont.[/QUOTE]
These are normal people too. Not property.
Your attitude to peoples privacy is disgusting.
Omfg theres no such thing as privacy for celebrities, theres always a fan ready to have a signature from you next corner, your new girlfriend will be on the tv along eith you and they just wont give up nitpicking your life
[QUOTE=LaTrefle;45862899]Omfg theres no such thing as privacy for celebrities, theres always a fan ready to have a signature from you next corner, your new girlfriend will be on the tv along eith you and they just wont give up nitpicking your life[/QUOTE]
They have the right to privacy.
What do you expect from people, to them to just ignore their favorite star that is going to play at cinemas and break records 1 months later
[QUOTE=MR-X;45862867]See how he likes his privacy being invaded.[/QUOTE]
Imagine is it was a red herring, the hacker has a guy he doesn't like, leaves a bunch of false clues in places, nice n obscure so 4chan doxx the wrong person and he gets fucked over of life.
Seems like he is not the original leaker.
Rumour says that the leaks were being passed around for a few months between some anons until one of them now decided to leak it.
So, what? Almost all photos are fake or something?
[QUOTE=SFC003;45862828]i refuse to believe that[/QUOTE]
i looked her up and i've never seen her movies or cared about them
[QUOTE=LaTrefle;45862899]Omfg theres no such thing as privacy for celebrities, theres always a fan ready to have a signature from you next corner, your new girlfriend will be on the tv along eith you and they just wont give up nitpicking your life[/QUOTE]
celebrities [i]do[/i] have privacy. they just prefer to not have it invaded.
Im waiting for facepunch to use the nudes as avatars
[QUOTE=Silent Bang;45862928]Im waiting for facepunch to use the nudes as avatars[/QUOTE]
I don't think a Jennifer Lawrence facial is appropriate though
[editline]1st September 2014[/editline]
[url]http://i.imgur.com/CAeWXmS.jpg[/url]
[QUOTE=The Saiko;45862915]Seems like he is not the original leaker.
Rumour says that the leaks were being passed around for a few months between some anons until one of them now decided to leak it.[/QUOTE]
wasn't the accounts breached by bruteforce? sounds like the pictures have been around for a while yeah, no way the guy managed to breach that many accounts by bruteforce in such a short time
Nearly 7,000 people viewing the thread. That has to be some kind of record.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;45862940]I don't think a Jennifer Lawrence facial is appropriate though
[editline]1st September 2014[/editline]
[url]http://i.imgur.com/CAeWXmS.jpg[/url][/QUOTE]
that was kinda surreal
[QUOTE=Ajacks;45862945]Nearly 7,000 people viewing the thread. That has to be some kind of record.[/QUOTE]
It is. We know.
-snip wrong quoteing fuck-
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;45862940]I don't think a Jennifer Lawrence facial is appropriate though
[editline]1st September 2014[/editline]
[url]http://i.imgur.com/CAeWXmS.jpg[/url][/QUOTE]
Woah, so the plot of the Hunger Games was she was hungry for semen all along.
its not her though
God this is getting out of control
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;45862940]I don't think a Jennifer Lawrence facial is appropriate though
[editline]1st September 2014[/editline]
[url]http://i.imgur.com/CAeWXmS.jpg[/url][/QUOTE]
also fake
[QUOTE=The Saiko;45862852]So appearently they found out who the hacker was and he's not a 15 year old.
I don't want to post the information but if you're curious there is a big thread on /b/ with all his infos and how they aquired it.
This guy is gonna be in some deep shit.[/QUOTE]
Why not just link the thread, jesus.
It's pretty hard to find individual threads on b
[QUOTE=Ruski v2.0;45862731]and a dozon hahahaha
also guy at the top who asked if there was proof for fermats last theorem, there is proof but it was only finally worked out using a supercomputer a few years ago. the man was a genius.[/QUOTE]
It's more likely that Fermat found one of the many near proofs that are available for it. The way it was solved used areas of mathematics which were completely unknown at his time.
I have to say though, being a celebrity has fucked up consequences, you can't live a "normal" life like everyone else.
Probably another 2 or 3 days until this dies out.
Edit: Hey Zukri, do explain how it's not, unless you're just another one with the holier than thou act bringing up the obvious again.
[QUOTE=LaTrefle;45862909]What do you expect from people, to them to just ignore their favorite star that is going to play at cinemas and break records 1 months later[/QUOTE]
The problem is that many people do not have friends or things happening in their life, that's why they seek stimulation elsewhere and get obsessed with celebrities, which become like surrogate friends.
We should just appreciate celebrities for what they do and leave it at that, but unfortunately for many people it's so easy to get overly attached and see celebs as some kind of attractions instead of human beings.
[QUOTE=Bobie;45862921]celebrities [i]do[/i] have privacy. they just prefer to not have it invaded.[/QUOTE]
Just a quick question for just my curiosity: maybe does that mean that whenever they show publicly something that is privacy it is OK? Because if they limit themselves to not to let anyone invade their privacy, then I might assume some celebrities (if not all) are OK by publicizing those parts of their privacy they wish to show off.
It sounds silly, perhaps it's a dumb assumption of mine, but that's what I think I see. Which is still dumb for the celebrities because it's simply ironical.
[QUOTE=Razumihkin;45862860]are you comparing this to the paparazzi as if its okay?
'Celebrity' isn't some homogeneous mass for neckbeards to masturbate too - and not everyone agrees to do a paid shoot for magazine.
People such as yourself who have no concept of privacy deserve the NSA.[/QUOTE]
Let me explain to you why you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and why you have what's probably the most retarded argument on here...
1) None of us have condoned what this guy did. We all agree that hacking people and invading their privacy is wrong. We all agree that the hacker should be punished.
2) The NSA and the hacker are a FALSE EQUIVALENCY. The hacker is an individual over which we have no control. The NSA, however, we do have control over and we pay their salaries. Regardless of motives, if we don't want the NSA looking at and collecting our data, then they need to stop or be prosecuted like any other hacker. End of story
3) You claim that celebrities are supposed to have "privacy", but tell me, do you think Donald Sterling should have had the same "privacy" you're parroting on about here? Or is it a different type of privacy now that it's something you don't support????
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
