• Massive celebrity nudes leak just happened on 4chan. Shuddap about how many people are viewing this
    2,051 replies, posted
[QUOTE=LarparNar;45869201]Wtf. If it works for any couple, who are you to say otherwise?[/QUOTE] I was speaking more for myself there. When I see a nude pic, sure that's nice. But I'm not gonna rip my pants off and reply, "be there in a min bby, u rdy 4 dis dick?"
[QUOTE=Apollo;45869210]My girlfriend and I traded pictures like that all the time. It's a good way to have some fun because, as anyone who has actually been in a relationship knows, you aren't going to be around each other 24/7 so you can't "just fuck" whenever you guys want. "Nude pictures are hardly foreplay. You gotta feel each other up." "If you're horny, just fuck" Seriously, the fucking virgin Hitch over here haha[/QUOTE] Maybe I'm just boring, but I never intend on doing that.
Out of all of this... At least they released them all at once. Imagine if every week they dropped an ENTIRE set on one celeb at a time.. That'd be alot worse than this.
lollin at people in this thread trying to dole out sex advice to people who think taking nude pics of yourself is a terrible idea instead of defending the nude pics (because it's indefensible)
[QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;45869197]Nude pictures are hardly foreplay. You gotta feel each other up.[/QUOTE] Foreplay can be whatever the fuck you want and whatever the fuck you want to be foreplay.
[QUOTE=Complifused;45855900]God truly does walk among men[/QUOTE] Post of the fucking year right here, I laughed so hard. Also Emma Watson isn't on there, a man can dream...
At least imgur arent beating around the bush as to why its so slow today [img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26976530/2/dsada.png[/img]
I think the hype train is over. There hasn't been any new content all day.
[QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;45869223]I was speaking more for myself there. When I see a nude pic, sure that's nice. But I'm not gonna rip my pants off and reply, "be there in a min bby, u rdy 4 dis dick?"[/QUOTE] Have you ever had a girlfriend for more than a year?
I don't get the big deal about Jennifer Lawrence anyway, sure she's cool, but there isn't anything special about her. [editline]2nd September 2014[/editline] The fact that she uploaded completely nude pictures of herself to the internet [I]has nothing to do[/I] with me not liking her much after all this shit.
This whole thing feels like trading pokemon cards. "Hey, I'll give you a Jennifer for a Kate."
[QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;45869825]This whole thing feels like trading pokemon cards. "Hey, I'll give you a Jennifer for a Kate."[/QUOTE] Kind of hard to believe seeing as how there are torrents for the entire collection.
[QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;45869223]I was speaking more for myself there. When I see a nude pic, sure that's nice. But I'm not gonna rip my pants off and reply, "be there in a min bby, u rdy 4 dis dick?"[/QUOTE] You seem to assume that in relationships, the partners stop masturbating altogether and only have casual sex with each other whenever they are aroused. A lot of people still masturbate, especially in early relationships where you don't have sex very often or haven't even started having sex yet, but the relationship still is a serious one you are invested in and hope for it to last long. So, you would prefer that your partner if aroused should touch themselves to yourself and not look up pictures of others and imagine being with others. This is also a massive confidence boost, knowing that you are the perfect person your partner pictures to climax. Have a think now, would you not be happy to know that the person you are in love with finds you that arousing? Hell, it's a confidence boost to many that ANYONE finds them attractive enough to masturbate to - any site with teenagers on it is proof of that. You also don't seem to comprehend the concept of trusting your partner, it's a risk sending nude photographs of yourself to your partner. By doing it you're stating that it's a risk worth taking and that you trust the person enough to expect them to keep the photographs to themselves. Since these pictures were leaked by being stolen and not shared by the receiving partner, it really only proves that their bond was an honest one and they were right to trust whoever they sent the image to. The fault is how they shared it (the unsafe service used). That's just how I see it, though. I'm writing this massive really fucking stupid post about sending nudes because you seem to have no idea what it actually is to do so.
[QUOTE=Doomish;45869248]lollin at people in this thread trying to dole out sex advice to people who think taking nude pics of yourself is a terrible idea instead of defending the nude pics (because it's indefensible)[/QUOTE] Taking nude pictures of yourself isn't a terrible idea. Putting them in the cloud is.
[QUOTE=CaptainHijacks;45869919]You seem to assume that in relationships, the partners stop masturbating altogether and only have casual sex with each other whenever they are aroused. A lot of people still masturbate, especially in early relationships where you don't have sex very often or haven't even started having sex yet, but the relationship still is a serious one you are invested in and hope for it to last long. So, you would prefer that your partner if aroused should touch themselves to yourself and not look up pictures of others and imagine being with others. This is also a massive confidence boost, knowing that you are the perfect person your partner pictures to climax. Have a think now, would you not be happy to know that the person you are in love with finds you that arousing? Hell, it's a confidence boost to many that ANYONE finds them attractive enough to masturbate to - any site with teenagers on it is proof of that. You also don't seem to comprehend the concept of trusting your partner, it's a risk sending nude photographs of yourself to your partner. By doing it you're stating that it's a risk worth taking and that you trust the person enough to expect them to keep the photographs to themselves. Since these pictures were leaked by being stolen and not shared by the receiving partner, it really only proves that their bond was an honest one and they were right to trust whoever they sent the image to. The fault is how they shared it (the unsafe service used). That's just how I see it, though. I'm writing this massive really fucking stupid post about sending nudes because you seem to have no idea what it actually is to do so.[/QUOTE] Yeah I don't know what I'm talking about. Hype got the best of me. The farthest I've gotten with a girl is head, and the longest relationship I had was 5 months so yeah. I probably shouldn't speak about these things.
[QUOTE=Primigenes;45869986]I don't understand people complaining about Jennifer Lawrence or other celebs being mad when there nudes get leaked. Like why the fuck wouldn't they be mad?![/QUOTE] Because celebrities aren't actually people dontcha know, so they shouldn't have feeling on the matter one way or the other apparently!
[QUOTE=V12US;45869946]Taking nude pictures of yourself isn't a terrible idea. Putting them in the cloud is.[/QUOTE] The safest thing to do is take pictures with an actual camera, print the pictures, seal them in an envelope with a message saying "burn after fapping" and leave them in your partner's mailbox.
[QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;45869990]The farthest I've gotten with a girl is head[/QUOTE] Still farther than most people getting excited about the leak like it's the second coming of Jesus Christ. Also 5 months is pretty good.
I'm a virgin and I fap quite a bit, but it's not okay to pretend like there's no justification for the people involved in this to be upset. It's not exactly great to see someone say shit like "pretty average, nothing special, completely worthless" about your body, as if there's no one attached to it. "oh but they're celebrities they are famous and they want people to see them naked anyway" Then wouldn't they make that available to the public if that were the case? Wouldn't they be glad to see someone invaded their privacy and traded those photos around? Being a celebrity doesn't make them an android with no feelings.
They can get angry about nude pictures that THEY took (Or you know, had someone take) all they want, doesn't mean their anger has a point to it though, they dropped themselves into it, if they get annoyed, they need to deal with it.
[QUOTE=GHOST!!!!;45870043]They can get angry about nude pictures that THEY took (Or you know, had someone take) all they want, doesn't mean their anger has a point to it though, they dropped themselves into it, if they get annoyed, they need to deal with it.[/QUOTE] lol they didnt They were told by apple that the pictures they share are private If anyone, it's apple that should deal with it.
[QUOTE=GHOST!!!!;45870043]They can get angry about nude pictures that THEY took (Or you know, had someone take) all they want, doesn't mean their anger has a point to it though, they dropped themselves into it, if they get annoyed, they need to deal with it.[/QUOTE] they didn't drop themselves into it, some hacker dropped them into it. just because someone dared to assume a cloud service was secure doesnt mean they deserve to have the entire internet staring at their nudes.
Leaving pictures like that stored online in a cloud is fucking stupid. No, it is not okay for them to have that happen to them but if you didn't want these spread then maybe you shouldn't keep them saved in a place that is connected to the fucking internet.
I'm sorry but if all the pics of my pingus I've sent through Snapchat over the years were leaked from their servers, Snapchat would be one to blame, not me. Not that I would care, I'm proud of my dingdong.
[QUOTE=BuffaloBill;45870059]Leaving pictures like that stored online in a cloud is fucking stupid. No, it is not okay for them to have that happen to them but if you didn't want these spread then maybe you shouldn't keep them saved in a place that is connected to the fucking internet.[/QUOTE] Hard to do that when the pics were meant for someone else and not millions of other people. Unless they sealed them in an envelope and sent them via postal, it's not easy to send nudes to another person without internet use.
[QUOTE=Mysterious;45870085]Hard to do that when the pics were meant for someone else and not millions of other people. Unless they sealed them in an envelope, it's not easy to send nudes to another person without internet use.[/QUOTE] Not saying it's easy, but this is a risk you willingly take when you do this sort of stuff.
Of course, but doesn't mean they're exempt from being upset when someone with more knowledge about computers/technology than them decides to take advantage.
[QUOTE=BuffaloBill;45870099]Not saying it's easy, but this is a risk you willingly take when you do this sort of stuff.[/QUOTE] you also take the risk of being t-boned while driving through an intersection but that doesn't mean you deserve to lose a leg because you had the audacity to drive in a busy area.
[QUOTE=Mysterious;45870112]Of course, but doesn't mean they're exempt from being upset when someone with more knowledge about computers/technology than them decides to take advantage.[/QUOTE] I've never understood the whole idea that because the bad outcome was already a possibility, they can't be upset about it. Imagine if we applied the same logic to a war veteran. "Did you hear what happened to Tom? He got his whole left leg blown off. Poor guy." "Pffft he knew what he was getting into."
[QUOTE=Mysterious;45870112]Of course, but doesn't mean they're exempt from being upset when someone with more knowledge about computers/technology than them decides to take advantage.[/QUOTE] Not in the slightest no, and like I said it sucks for them to have their privacy broken like this. But the fact their nude pics are out is ultimately only down to their decision to store them there/their actions putting them online already (albeit behind protection) in my opinion. If you disagree on that part, no problem ofcourse, to each their own. [editline]2nd September 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Derpmeifter;45870160]you also take the risk of being t-boned while driving through an intersection but that doesn't mean you deserve to lose a leg because you had the audacity to drive in a busy area.[/QUOTE] There's a difference between doing a common everyday action and putting something really private online behind protection.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.