Massive celebrity nudes leak just happened on 4chan. Shuddap about how many people are viewing this - Polidicks - Facepunch Forum

Massive celebrity nudes leak just happened on 4chan. Shuddap about how many people are viewing this

2,051 replies, posted
In This Thread

[QUOTE=NuclearJesus;45874090]Bring on the dumb ratings, call me a buzzkill. . .this is a bad thing. These people, regardless of their station in life, took these photos in private moments. Intimate moments. They put their trust in the assertation that they were safe, and secure. I know, I know. . .security is an illusion. But these people have the same right to privacy as anybody. This leak is a violation, plain and simple. I don't care about the legal gray areas. The moral issue is clear. In many cases, these people were positive the pictures had been deleted. They were never meant for public consumption. I see no difference between this, and jerking off to covert upskirt porn. These people never intended for you to see them in their most intimate, private moments. I understand. "Hey, fuck off. Tits are tits." You see something arousing, you're going to jerk off. I get it. It's human curiosity. But this is wrong. This whole thing is wrong. The argument that "If they didn't want people to get ahold of these pics, they shouldn't have taken them," to me, is not much different from "If she didn't want me hiding in her closet, she shouldn't have worn fuck-me pumps." Jerk off to what you want to jerk off to. But don't be so incredulous that some people may see a moral issue. Grow the fuck up, guys.[/QUOTE] How do people not get it yet. The only reason these are jerked to is because the act is considered wrong and naughty, it's a kink. As actual porn it's mediocre at best.

[QUOTE=PlasmaDragon;45873727]Don't know if it's been posted yet, but McKayla Maroney's pictures are apparently confirmed to be underage, everyone should probably get rid of them. [URL="http://www.reddit.com/r/TheFappening/comments/2fa2a1/meta_effective_immediately_any/"]http://www.reddit.com/r/TheFappening/comments/2fa2a1/meta_effective_immediately_any/[/URL][/QUOTE] oh FUCK christ shit [editline]2nd September 2014[/editline] things are about to get interesting

[QUOTE=PlasmaDragon;45873727]Don't know if it's been posted yet, but McKayla Maroney's pictures are apparently confirmed to be underage, everyone should probably get rid of them. [URL="http://www.reddit.com/r/TheFappening/comments/2fa2a1/meta_effective_immediately_any/"]http://www.reddit.com/r/TheFappening/comments/2fa2a1/meta_effective_immediately_any/[/URL][/QUOTE] What the fuck " so there is child porn here, please remove them ; anyway if you have pics please post them in websites where they can't be removed thx " Seriously what the fuck ? I am the only one seeing some insane creepy contradiction in that post ? Or am I just tired because it's fucking late Also reading the comment's it's like reddit is concerned because they risk prison, and not because they jacked off[I] on stolen pics of a 16 years old teenager[/I]. I think it's enough internet for today.

[QUOTE=kaskade700;45874492]How do people not get it yet. The only reason these are jerked to is because the act is considered wrong and naughty, it's a kink. As actual porn it's mediocre at best.[/QUOTE] While "naughty" is a major understatement, I DO get it. That doesn't make it, or you guys, any less wrong.

The PCF has denied and returned all donations from Reddit and removed the reddit donation page..... [url]http://www.pcf.org/site/c.leJRIROrEpH/b.9200789/k.C50B/Prostate_Cancer_Foundation_Response_Statement_to_Reddit_Post.htm[/url]

[QUOTE=NuclearJesus;45874619]While "naughty" is a major understatement, I DO get it. That doesn't make it, or you guys, any less wrong.[/QUOTE] I suppose so but you got to realize you're talking to a wall here. Sure some dimwits in this thread try to defend the act and push the blame on the victims promiscuous behavior, lack of knowledge around cloud storage or what have you. The reason the primary reply to your kind of post is "moralfag lol" is because pointing fingers at these people does absolutely nothing except feed your own illusion of being a better man, which is pretty frowned upon in all internet culture because most people post on web-boards to be honest with their opinion and not have their very real social life fucked over end because of it, then someone like you tries to drag localized morality bullshit into the topic duo to a deep misunderstanding of why this thread even exists. I have 2 people I can share hilarious leak phooshops with in my local area, on here there's thousands. edit: this came out harsh, I'm talking about everyone trying to make a dent by drawing on morality in this thread, not just your arguments.

[QUOTE=kaskade700;45874770]I suppose so but you got to realize you're talking to a wall here. Sure some dimwits in this thread try to defend the act and push the blame on the victims promiscuous behavior, lack of knowledge around cloud storage or what have you. The reason the primary reply is to your kind of post is "moralfag lol" is because pointing fingers at these people does absolutely nothing except feed your own illusion of being a better man, which is pretty frowned upon in all internet culture because most people post on web-boards to be honest with their opinion and not have their very real social life fucked over end because of it, then someone like you tries to drag localized morality bullshit into the topic duo to a deep misunderstanding of why this thread even exists. I have 2 people I can share hilarious leak phooshops with in my local area, on here there's thousands.[/QUOTE] If people don't want to be called out on their morals then maybe they shouldn't post things that highlight their lack of moral fiber in the first place.

Not saying I'm a better person. I'm saying "Be a better person." Huge difference. I couldn't give a shit less what's frowned upon on a message board. I'm just deeply sickened at what amounts to a group of people chuckling and masturbating over what amounts to a sexual violation of other human beings.

[QUOTE=SgtCr4zyGunz;45874807]If people don't want to be called out on their morals then maybe they shouldn't post things that highlight their lack of moral fiber in the first place.[/QUOTE] That went over your head, we got to go simpler: People do not give a shit when they get called out on their morals, except the few dimwits I mentioned above who actually think it's justifiable and spew borderline retarded arguments to try and win you over. Most of us are just curious to see idols we're not supposed to see naked naked, is it vile? Sure, do I give a shit? Nope. Morality only works in conjunction with peer presure.

[QUOTE=endorphinsam;45873762]pls stay in reddit or lurk more[/QUOTE] Sorry maybe one day I'll be a master shitposter too

[QUOTE=SkolVikings94;45874993]Sorry maybe one day I'll be a master shitposter too[/QUOTE] today's the day

[QUOTE=SA Spyder;45872119]Why's everyone banging on about iCloud? Some article said that this MIGHT originate from a hacked iCloud (without any proof or anything really to go on) and every other site mirrored the same article but with more finalist language (again, without any proof or anything really to go on). I mean I understand that it's fun to point fingers at Apple here, but until (and if ever) we find out where the leaks originated from, playing the blame game is a bit of a waste of time.[/QUOTE] Find My Iphone service API didn't have bruteforce protection, it was only patched after this leak. Also everyone from the leak had Iphones.

[QUOTE=kaskade700;45874855]That went over your head, we got to go simpler: People do not give a shit when they get called out on their morals, except the few dimwits I mentioned above who actually think it's justifiable and spew borderline retarded arguments to try and win you over. Most of us are just curious to see idols we're not supposed to see naked naked, is it vile? Sure, do I give a shit? Nope. Morality only works in conjunction with peer presure.[/QUOTE] If all you wanna do is look at nude pics then how about you do so quietly instead of trying to rationalize the actions of creeps?

[QUOTE=PlasmaDragon;45873727]Don't know if it's been posted yet, but McKayla Maroney's pictures are apparently confirmed to be underage, everyone should probably get rid of them. [URL="http://www.reddit.com/r/TheFappening/comments/2fa2a1/meta_effective_immediately_any/"]http://www.reddit.com/r/TheFappening/comments/2fa2a1/meta_effective_immediately_any/[/URL][/QUOTE] so.. does that make her a producer of cp.... [editline]2nd September 2014[/editline] I mean, it would be ridiculous if it does, but laws can be pretty retarded

[QUOTE=426_Hemi;45874612]What the fuck " so there is child porn here, please remove them ; anyway if you have pics please post them in websites where they can't be removed thx " Seriously what the fuck ? I am the only one seeing some insane creepy contradiction in that post ? Or am I just tired because it's fucking late Also reading the comment's it's like reddit is concerned because they risk prison, and not because they jacked off[I] on stolen pics of a 16 years old teenager[/I]. I think it's enough internet for today.[/QUOTE] Underage nudes != child porn.

[QUOTE=Don Merino;45875372]Underage nudes != child porn.[/QUOTE] Isnt that a classic example of how retarded the law is, what else are underage nudes classified as?

It's called child porn because there are children involved. The point is that they are sexually undeveloped. Tit pictures of a 17 year old are still illegal in some countries (topless modelling is allowed in many countries if parents consent), but they are not "child porn". [editline]2nd September 2014[/editline] Automerge. Also, != means "does not equal" [editline]2nd September 2014[/editline] I also misread this as 426_Hemi talking when he was actually quoting reddit.

[QUOTE=Don Merino;45875392]It's called child porn because there are children involved. The point is that they are sexually undeveloped. Tit pictures of a 17 year old are still illegal in some countries (topless modelling is allowed in many countries if parents consent), but they are not "child porn". [editline]2nd September 2014[/editline] Automerge. Also, != means "does not equal" [editline]2nd September 2014[/editline] I also misread this as 426_Hemi talking when he was actually quoting reddit.[/QUOTE] There was a movie which one of the actresses wasn't allowed to actually watch because boobs were shown and she wasn't 18 yet. Her boobs.

[QUOTE=Robber;45875480]There was a movie which one of the actresses wasn't allowed to actually watch because boobs were shown and she wasn't 18 yet. Her boobs.[/QUOTE] Thora Birch in American Beauty. She was 15 at the time, I believe.

I think its about time to lock this thread. This has gotten blown out of proportion.

[QUOTE=SexualShark;45875687]I think its about time to lock this thread. This has gotten blown out of proportion.[/QUOTE] If this thread gets locked, 5,000 plus guests are probably going to create accounts and start whining about it.

[QUOTE=Snickerdoodle;45875784]If this thread gets locked, 5,000 plus guests are probably going to create accounts and start whining about it.[/QUOTE] thats 5000 guests postal can handle

[QUOTE=Silence I Kill You;45874736]The PCF has denied and returned all donations from Reddit and removed the reddit donation page..... [url]http://www.pcf.org/site/c.leJRIROrEpH/b.9200789/k.C50B/Prostate_Cancer_Foundation_Response_Statement_to_Reddit_Post.htm[/url][/QUOTE] their release is dated 2104 and 2014, which is the real date?!

[B]WE NEED THE FUNNY BACK!!!!![/B] Seriously, this thread has gotten WAAAYYY too serious..... [IMG]http://i.4cdn.org/b/1409697834565.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=Don Merino;45875372]Underage nudes != child porn.[/QUOTE] That is actually true AFAIK. It's classified under nudism if there's no hint of sex/sexualization. But i heard of a BJ video which may be against the law in some countries.

[QUOTE=Don Merino;45875372]Underage nudes != child porn.[/QUOTE] Exactly! Many people don't understand how porn is defined. Naked people in a picture or movie doesn't mean that this is Porn (just by being naked). The same logic applies to underaged people who are naked in a picture: It doesnt equal porn. You will find alot of pictures of completly naked underaged people for (sexual or medical-) education purposes. If the picture is not just a selfi of someone who happens to be naked, if it is a picture that has a clear pornographic intend, it will be viewed as porn. For example when somebody poses in a very sexual way and simulates or performs a sexual act with the intend to "stimulate" the person who views the picture, it is porn. Still a website cant just post those pictures because you dont want to get caught up in the accusion of promoting CP! So its very wise to be careful and stay away from those pics, just to be sure. Legally there wouldnt be any CP- related consequence from the pics that have been leaked so far

[QUOTE=MatheusMCardoso;45876143]That is actually true AFAIK. It's classified under nudism if there's no hint of sex/sexualization. But i heard of a BJ video which may be against the law in some countries.[/QUOTE] Yeah, child nudity doesn't necessarily make an image pornographic. That being said, it doesn't make a difference what it technically is if you use it for sexual gratification. You'll be charged with possession of child pornography all the same. [editline]oh hamburgers[/editline] And you're still just as horrible of a person, but that should go without saying.

[QUOTE=lowers;45876192]Exactly! Many people don't understand how porn is defined. Naked people in a picture or movie doesn't mean that this is Porn (just by being naked). The same logic applies to underaged people who are naked in a picture: It doesnt equal porn. You will find alot of pictures of completly naked underaged people for (sexual or medical-) education purposes. If the picture is not just a selfi of someone who happens to be naked, if it is a picture that has a clear pornographic intend, it will be viewed as porn. For example when somebody poses in a very sexual way and simulates or performs a sexual act with the intend to "stimulate" the person who views the picture, it is porn. Still a website cant just post those pictures because you dont want to get caught up in the accusion of promoting CP! So its very wise to be careful and stay away from those pics, just to be sure. Legally there wouldnt be any CP- related consequence from the pics that have been leaked so far[/QUOTE] Welcome, you joined to post about child porn. Not that it's bad, but everyone has a start.

[QUOTE=Falkok15;45876391]Welcome, you joined to post about child porn. Not that it's bad, but everyone has a start.[/QUOTE] well, at least judging from his username the only place to go from here is up.

Can anybody confirm that is real or not? [URL]http://imgur.com/a/dg9EX[/URL] Sorry if I'm late. [editline]2nd September 2014[/editline] nvm just saw the tattoo

Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.