Western diplomats are running out of ways to say that they’re angry with Russian President Vladimir - Polidicks

Just use Haddockian argot in the next angry letter, whoops, diplomatic communique.

[QUOTE=Pvt. Martin;44638608]What other non violent option is there to smack Putin with?[/QUOTE] Take a picture of him and draw a penis on his forehead. Then proceed to mail it to him. I mean, no one else has done that yet, Might as well.

[QUOTE=Berque-IL;44645201]It doesn't help that the U.S. has a nancy ass president who's administration has done just as many equally corrupt actions... minus invading multiple countries. [/QUOTE] America is corrupt without a doubt, but Russia is at an entirely different level.

[QUOTE=Pikabuu2;44646088]Tell Eastern Europe to man-up and get ready, I don't want America fully involved in this if shit goes down. I'm pretty sure the other European countries can handle it.[/QUOTE] Dunno man, Estonian soldiers fought and died alongside many other nationalities in YOUR wars, and keep doing so to this day. The US was the first nation ever to fully invoke a NATO military mobilization in 2001, dragging us all with you. And now you're asking for the exact opposite when it's in fact time for YOU to man up and live up to the call of duty?

Sometimes I wish geopolitics was a simple as it is in Civilization (i.e. invading other countries on a whim because they made you angry).

[QUOTE=Hammerz;44650057]Too bad if Russia pulls anything against Poland or the Baltic states, USA is bound to get in this mess fully, because of NATO.[/QUOTE] If the US is involved, so are these guys: [t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Location_NATO_2009_blue.svg/616px-Location_NATO_2009_blue.svg.png[/t] Don't be too afraid, we'd be in it together.

Imagine how fucked we would be without nukes. No big spooky weapon to keep shit like this from boiling over.

He hasn't even received a major warmongerer rating and been denounced yet. It's almost like they don't make these politicians play civ before letting them run a country.

Can we not go to war? I don't want to explain to a bunch of annoying pricks that my religion prohibits killing a person and thus I am not charging into war over and over again because the way things work in the U.S. nobody communicates to anybody else important things. [editline]26th April 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=KommradKommisar;44653291]Imagine how fucked we would be without nukes. No big spooky weapon to keep shit like this from boiling over.[/QUOTE] It'd probably be the other way around. Russia could keep progressing right now, I think, without worry because if we fired a nuke at them they'd fire one back and we know this.

[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;44652477]If the US is involved, so are these guys: [t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Location_NATO_2009_blue.svg/616px-Location_NATO_2009_blue.svg.png[/t] Don't be too afraid, we'd be in it together.[/QUOTE] As a Canadian, we don't want to be fucking involved by default in this bullshit and we get shunned if we dare say that.

[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;44652477]If the US is involved, so are these guys: [t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Location_NATO_2009_blue.svg/616px-Location_NATO_2009_blue.svg.png[/t] Don't be too afraid, we'd be in it together.[/QUOTE] Oh shit, Iceland! Russia better back the fuck up.

When you really boil it down, the West doesn't really have that much influence in what Russia does. Saying they're angry is about all they can do.