Woman Arrested for Recording 4 Minutes of "New Moon" - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Lazor;18733038]and there's no need to give her 3 years of jail time[/QUOTE] Really? Because she broke the law by recording the movie regardless of if she claims to know it or not. Even if you can hear her talking during the recording, that's no reason to say that she didn't know. She shouldn't have HAD the camera in there.

she'd get less jail time if she stole the reel from the theater

[QUOTE=Lazor;18733098]she'd get less jail time if she stole the reel from the theater[/QUOTE] Can you prove that? I'm pretty sure she'd have more charges then just theft, like intent to make copies and distribute it.

you'd have to prove she had intent, which you can't prove at all just because she stole the reel.

Nice birthday for her friend. And even though we all hate Twilight, I think she didn't deserve this.

I wouldn't have to prove shit. Do you know each law by heart, or are you just pulling things out of your ass now?

what I'm talking about the court if she took the reel learn to read

Law can save your life, or it can take it.

This is probably the worst way to get arrested.

She gets caught with 4 minutes of twilight yet there are cam recordings of movies EVERYWHERE?

[QUOTE=Lazor;18733248]what I'm talking about the court if she took the reel learn to read[/QUOTE] I did read, and I said that she could be charged with theft with intent to make copies and distribute it.

[QUOTE=vassikinexthree;18733343]I did read, and I said that she could be charged with theft with intent to make copies and distribute it. Then you said that they would need proof, so I told you that they don't need proof of you having intent to distribute drugs, so why would they need it for this? If you take a copy of a movie, there's a high chance you have the intent to distribute it.[/QUOTE] do you even understand what I'm saying I'm not talking about what other retarded, unjustified charges would come about. I'm talking about the theft charge for taking the reel. Hell, people who assault others physically don't get even a year in jail a lot of times.

I thought we all agreed that piracy isn't that serious of crime.

Why did you put in extra to the quote, I didn't type that... And do YOU understand what I'M saying? I'm saying that she WOULDN'T just be charged for taking the reel. She would be charged for taking the reel WITH INTENT TO COPY AND DISTRIBUTE IT.

[QUOTE=johanz;18732357]Even if it's twilight, 3 years is awful. Who made these shitty laws?[/QUOTE] The MPAA.

[QUOTE=Lazor;18732765]i guarantee you've broken multiple laws unknowingly and you'd be pitching a fit to if some asshole decided to arrest you on a technicality.[/QUOTE] I'm a motherfucking hardnut, I eat mince pies on Christmas day in England!

[QUOTE=vassikinexthree;18733411]Why did you put in extra to the quote, I didn't type that... And do YOU understand what I'M saying? I'm saying that she WOULDN'T just be charged for taking the reel. She would be charged for taking the reel WITH INTENT TO COPY AND DISTRIBUTE IT.[/QUOTE] yes you did type it, if you don't want to be quoted then edit out your stupid shit earlier and the point is actual crimes that matter get less punishment than recording 4 minutes of this movie, and no she probably wouldn't be charged with intent to copy and distribute unless she had some actual way of copying the reel, which my statement does not assume.

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8GGp_bpsng[/url] :frog: I rest my case.

[QUOTE=Lazor;18733568]yes you did type it, if you don't want to be quoted then edit out your stupid shit earlier and the point is actual crimes that matter get less punishment than recording 4 minutes of this movie, and no she probably wouldn't be charged with intent to copy and distribute unless she had some actual way of copying the reel, which my statement does not assume.[/QUOTE] If I typed it and edited it out, why is there no "edited by ___ at ___" on my post :downs: And that doesn't matter, the laws the law, no matter how stupid. I don't agree with the law, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

[QUOTE=Marijuanananana;18732256]She should have recorded the movie in Canada, we have no laws against filming movies in the theatre, the staff there just frown on it.[/QUOTE] Isn't everything like that in Canada?

[QUOTE=vassikinexthree;18733720]If I typed it and edited it out, why is there no "edited by ___ at ___" on my post :downs: And that doesn't matter, the laws the law, no matter how stupid. I don't agree with the law, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.[/QUOTE] if you edit within a certain amount of time the edit by line doesn't show up, but nice try. and just because it's the law doesn't make it right to give someone 3 years for barely violating it and not even doing shit to stop people who actually record the whole movie with intent to distribute

[QUOTE=Lazor;18733802]if you edit within a certain amount of time the edit by line doesn't show up, but nice try. and just because it's the law doesn't make it right to give someone 3 years for barely violating it and not even doing shit to stop people who actually record the whole movie with intent to distribute[/QUOTE] Yeah, I didn't edit my post, it looks like you just put that in to make it look like I'm trying to derail the argument by comparing this to drugs. And it doesn't matter how much she violated it, again, she shouldn't have even had the camera in the theatre, and the definitely shouldn't have been playing with it during the movie. But guess what, when the people who record the whole movie get caught, they do get punished :downs: Also, this article was clearly written with a bias towards the woman. My family got "attacked" by the news, they can make it seem like anybody was right or wrong by leaving out parts of the story, which they probably did here.

keep trying to play the victim and pretending you didn't edit that out of your post, it's entertaining

I don't know about anyone else, but I would be pissed if there was a group of people singing "Happy Birthday" whilst I was watching a movie. Granted, it's Twilight so no one cares anyways, but still.

it was probably before the movie

[QUOTE=Lazor;18733972]keep trying to play the victim and pretending you didn't edit that out of your post, it's entertaining[/QUOTE] Keep using your planted edit as a reason to not have to argue because I've been making valid points. It's entertaining.

like, right before what the hell happened to my automerge

I posted, that's what.

[QUOTE=johanz;18732663]That's why legal law is retarded.[/QUOTE] :psypop: As opposed to, say, illegal law?

[QUOTE=vassikinexthree;18734019]Keep using your planted edit as a reason to not have to argue because I've been making valid points. It's entertaining.[/QUOTE] you're the dumbass who started bitching, I didn't even mention any of the quoted text that you're referring to.