• Better Than A Condom? Discreet Nanofabric Protects Against Pregnancy and HIV
    44 replies, posted
So... nano-condom?
I love this thread already. [img]http://www.booksstore.info/gog/girl.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.booksstore.info/polo/beaty.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;38710145]This seems pointless to me, condoms are terrible because they ruin the feeling, I don't want to swap out latex for another synthetic layer of shit. Pulling out is a reliable method of preventing pregnancy (assuming you can control yourself of course), especially if your girlfriend is on the pill too.[/QUOTE] You are an idiot for thinking that, pulling out is the most unreliable way to prevent pregnancy.
[QUOTE=ewitwins;38705837]I totally want to have sex without a condom but would never risk it, I'm too paranoid. It's always been me with condoms and "her" (whoever) with birth control, just the safest way to do it. That's like 95% effectiveness plus another 95% effectiveness, so basically the minimal amount of risk possible.[/QUOTE] Pills work great don't worry, go ahead.
If all you did was fuck with a condom you never had sex. All you did was fuck a piece of plastic inside a woman.
[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;38710145]This seems pointless to me, condoms are terrible because they ruin the feeling, I don't want to swap out latex for another synthetic layer of shit. Pulling out is a reliable method of preventing pregnancy (assuming you can control yourself of course), especially if your girlfriend is on the pill too.[/QUOTE] Too bad pre-cum contains sperm too, so your sex. Then again, you probably never had sex.
[QUOTE=ewitwins;38705837]I totally want to have sex without a condom but would never risk it, I'm too paranoid. It's always been me with condoms and "her" (whoever) with birth control, just the safest way to do it. That's like 95% effectiveness plus another 95% effectiveness, so basically the minimal amount of risk possible.[/QUOTE] Just cash out the morning after and math says you're still saving her birth control by just using condoms.
Absolutely everything is solved with nano technology apparently, that's pretty awesome. Adam Jensen here we come
[QUOTE=joost1120;38712251]Too bad pre-cum contains sperm too, so your sex. Then again, you probably never had sex.[/QUOTE] "hurr hurr i bet you've never had sex but i have!!! Alot !!" Oh look it's that lame ass insult. "Popular belief--dating back to a 1966 Masters & Johnson study[11] --states that pre-ejaculate may contain sperm that can cause pregnancy, which is a common basis of argument against the use of coitus interruptus (withdrawal) as a contraceptive method. However, some studies have found that withdrawal could be almost as effective as condoms in preventing pregnancy.[12] There have been several small-scale studies (sample sizes ranging from 4 to 23[5]) that conclude no sperm is present, and thus, pre-ejaculate is ineffectual at causing pregnancy.[1][2][3][4]" [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-ejaculate[/url] And beyond that, I clearly said especially if your girlfriend is on the pill.
[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;38710145]This seems pointless to me, condoms are terrible because they ruin the feeling, I don't want to swap out latex for another synthetic layer of shit. Pulling out is a reliable method of preventing pregnancy (assuming you can control yourself of course), especially if your girlfriend is on the pill too.[/QUOTE] What are you, the Pope?
That whole argument is moot anyway, if you'd bothered to read: [quote]An electrically spun nanofabric, the technology is designed to dissolve in the body, releasing preventative drugs. [...] The scientists created fabrics that dissolve in minutes for immediate protection,[/quote] So no condom - this dissolves and the drugs it was made up from provide the protection - you get sex without interference.
[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;38721254]sample sizes ranging from 4 to 23[/QUOTE] lol
[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;38721254]"hurr hurr i bet you've never had sex but i have!!! Alot !!" Oh look it's that lame ass insult. "Popular belief--dating back to a 1966 Masters & Johnson study[11] --states that pre-ejaculate may contain sperm that can cause pregnancy, which is a common basis of argument against the use of coitus interruptus (withdrawal) as a contraceptive method. However, some studies have found that withdrawal could be almost as effective as condoms in preventing pregnancy.[12] There have been several small-scale studies (sample sizes ranging from 4 to 23[5]) that conclude no sperm is present, and thus, pre-ejaculate is ineffectual at causing pregnancy.[1][2][3][4]" [URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-ejaculate[/URL] And beyond that, I clearly said especially if your girlfriend is on the pill.[/QUOTE] As someone who's had very close calls with a girl who WAS on the pill, I would really suggest you educate yourself further on the necessities of safe sex, not only to prevent pregnancy, but STD's and STI's as well. Not everyone is aware of the fact they may be harboring diseases, particularly diseases like HPV, which often produce no symptoms and is not easily tested for.
I recall hearing recently that as many a third of the U.S. population that is infected with HIV is unaware that they are.
[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;38710145]This seems pointless to me, condoms are terrible because they ruin the feeling, I don't want to swap out latex for another synthetic layer of shit. Pulling out is a reliable method of preventing pregnancy (assuming you can control yourself of course), especially if your girlfriend is on the pill too.[/QUOTE] Yeah.. please drive out of this thread on your scooter listening to obnoxious techno music. Your like those short haired twats in my area that thinks they are thug because the pull out. Obviously neither of you have heard of PRECUM
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.