• Sarah Palin’s Facebook: ‘Reagan Would Be Ashamed’ Of ‘Stalin-esque’ GOP ‘Cannibal’ Tactics
    52 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Boba_Fett;34450442]Newt Gingrich is perhaps the most guilty out of all the candidates.[/QUOTE] No doubt the most hypocritical, on several levels.
[QUOTE=ThePinkPanzer;34442616]Maybe Paul Revere will come riding in on his horse, shooting his guns and ringing his bells and shouting the British are coming to fix America.[/QUOTE] One if by land, bells if by two.
[QUOTE=yoyojumpy;34449996][IMG]http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/2241/romneyj.jpg[/IMG] Received this in the mail today as well. Mitt Romney once criticised Ronald Reagan, how could you even [I]consider[/I] voting this man into office? How could our country survive if we don't return to a Reagan-Bush presidency?[/QUOTE] Don't worry, I posted this on Evangelicals for Mitt Romney Facebook page: [IMG]http://img859.imageshack.us/img859/4247/40641933780163290921011.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=kaven;34443266]I think Reagan would be ashamed of being called the father of modern conservatism.[/QUOTE] Why do you say this, just wondering? He [I]did[/I] write Rush Limbaugh a letter thanking him for spreading Conservative ideals. And Rush is worse than Perry or Santorum
Mitt Romney - "I'll do and say anything for your vote!"
[QUOTE=ThePinkPanzer;34442616] [B]Satanists.[/B][/QUOTE] Satan. Staan. Stalan. Stalin. The devil wears many faces...
[QUOTE=Hidole555;34453152]Satan. Staan. Stalan. Stalin. The devil wears many faces...[/QUOTE] Stalin Spalin Palin [I]Mother of god[/I] Satan = Stalin = Palin = Romney = [I]Santa Claus[/I]
satan claus christmas is the devil
i can play this game too GOP Candidates have eyes. You know who else has eyes? SATAN.
hITLER.
[QUOTE=Mon;34442822]why do all these politicians have a such a hard-on for reagan[/QUOTE] he was, effectively, the founder of far-right, free-market capitalistic economics in the United States. at the very least, he brought the concept here, and since all of these candidates feel that the free market can fix everything, they obviously love and because ronald reagan brought the people out of a drought of national pride after the Vietnam War... ...and then drove them straight into a drought of economic prosperity with his poorly thought-out financial choices and shady anti-communist operations
[QUOTE=Last or First;34454239]Stalin Spalin Palin [I]Mother of god[/I] Satan = Stalin = Palin = Romney = [I]Santa Claus[/I][/QUOTE] Satan = Stalin = Palin = Pulin = Putin!!!! Obama = 44th president = 44 BC = Caeser dies, new Egyptian co ruler = Egypt = Pyramids = Pyramids with eyes in them (ILLUMINATI) = Pyramids with eyes in them point to the sky = Sky holds heaven = Heaven = Hell = Satan!!!!! OH GOD, OBAMA IS IN THE ILLUMINATI AND WAS BEHIND JULIUS CAESERS DEATH! HE SECRETLY OWNS EGYPT AND HIM AND THE ILLUMINATI HAVE A BASE IN THE PYRAMIDS! THEY TOOK OVER HEAVEN AND ARE ALL FROM HELL AND THEY ARE ALL SATANS! IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW.
You guys realize that regan was the man that ordered the whole sale slaughter of his own countries industiral complex in the 70s and 80s. So in reality Regan was the cannibal yes Stalin was bad, but compare him to Mao and China he uplifted the Soviet Union riding on the WWII game. After Stalin died more infighting and the rest of the leaders rejected all Stalinistical idealogys going back to a traditional Socialistic system which caused them to run out of money, and you have the 1991 collapse of the country leading a new Russian Federation rising up out of the ashes wielding Capitalism, and a Free Market.
Whoa fellas, getting out on the deep end of the pool here. :v:
Isn't it because the GOP were attacking each other on personal issues? She said that to prevent them from attacking each other, but the Democrats and the President, fair game. Or she actually said something intelligent for once.
I dont get why liberals are anti gun, should they not be in favour of indivudual liberties? If anything the ultra comservatives should be anti-gun
[QUOTE=Contag;34452739]Mitt Romney - "I'll do and say anything for your vote!"[/QUOTE] You could say that about any candidate during any election. Even Obama back before he was elected, but at least he was more likable.
[QUOTE=DrBreen;34460649]I dont get why liberals are anti gun, should they not be in favour of indivudual liberties? If anything the ultra comservatives should be anti-gun[/QUOTE]Its not an issue of disliking firearms, its an issue of widespread availability and easy accessibility of said firearms. Most just want more regulations an restrictions placed on them and better systems in place for tracking them. Its not about taking guns away from law abiding citizens, its about keeping guns away from lunatics who might try to shoot up a public meeting and shoot a congresswoman in the head.
[QUOTE=Doctor Zedacon;34460922]Its not an issue of disliking firearms, its an issue of widespread availability and easy accessibility of said firearms. Most just want more regulations an restrictions placed on them and better systems in place for tracking them. Its not about taking guns away from law abiding citizens, its about keeping guns away from lunatics who might try to shoot up a public meeting and shoot a congresswoman in the head.[/QUOTE] that makes more sense, thanks for clarifying that. these issues from a European point of view can be rather confusing
[QUOTE=DrBreen;34460649]I dont get why liberals are anti gun, should they not be in favour of indivudual liberties? If anything the ultra comservatives should be anti-gun[/QUOTE] Gun control is actually not a big issue anymore. There hasn't been any gun control laws passed since the 90's. Lots of paranoid Conservatives just act like it's still relevant.
[QUOTE=joes33431;34455957]i can play this game too GOP Candidates have eyes. You know who else has eyes? SATAN.[/QUOTE] Potatoes too. And the hills have eyes.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.