Intelligence Officials: Russians may have Compromising Information on Trump - Polidicks

[thumb]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C165AE3VEAArhi0.jpg[/thumb] [url=https://shop.buzzfeed.com/collections/garbage]Buzzfeed[/url] has some new merch.

[QUOTE=KillRay;51656560]I want transparency about trumps piss fetish[/QUOTE] I want fan art and videos done around it honestly. I actually need to go check up what TYT thinks of this speaking about that.

[QUOTE=Tudd;51656556]And I am fine with that. I think Putin has to be taken seriously, but I am more predisposed to want to work with him on some foreign issues, so that is why I ain't excitedly into every Russian collusion piece. But I can say, it is only to the benefit of America and it's citizens to have as much transparency focused on that relationship.[/QUOTE] This we can agree on.

Until trump says exactly "I do not love pee pee" He is the peepee-man to me

[QUOTE=KillRay;51656568]Until trump says exactly "I do not love pee pee" He is the peepee-man to me[/QUOTE] Why you think his hair is always gold? [sp]Has this joke not been made yet?[/sp]

[QUOTE=Tudd;51656578]Why you think his hair is always gold? [sp]Has this joke not been made yet?[/sp][/QUOTE] I wasn't gonna make it but I'm glad someone did

Probably l8 because reading through 20 pages is not fun and I'm only on the first couple but: Putin uses his dirt to impeach trump so that Pence becomes president and destroys America.

[QUOTE=Govna;51656461]We need to get rid of him already. Nothing of value would be lost on this forum.[/QUOTE] wow, because you disagree with his point of view?

[QUOTE=Tudd;51656503]And for the red herring stuff. I think I have shown atleast two good examples of people basically being fine this could be fake and bring damage. Sorry I used the word several, but I redact that to the only a tiny amount of people. I just honestly hope this isn't an attitude that people continue to adopt cause it does have ramifications for both sides.[/QUOTE] Just curious but what's your opinion on the impressively large majority of Trump supporters that act exactly the same?

[QUOTE=Tudd;51656503]And for the red herring stuff. I think I have shown atleast two good examples of people basically being fine this could be fake and bring damage. Sorry I used the word several, but I redact that to the only a tiny amount of people. I just honestly hope this isn't an attitude that people continue to adopt cause it does have ramifications for both sides.[/QUOTE] That's debatable. One was a snarky one-liner punctuated by a smiley face, hardly your most solid accusation. The other expected the info to be true, mentioned no legal action should come of it without solid proof, and said nothing about "being fine this could be fake" Even when admitting you made a bullshit accusation, you make more bullshit accusations. Sad!

[QUOTE=Cructo;51656627]could you show examples of the "large majority of Trump supporters" (31489818+1 people) who "act exactly the same"?[/QUOTE] Sure, have you tried checking SH from some time around the start of the election to around the end? Cause most Trump supporters were acting exactly that way during most of the campaign.

[QUOTE=Alice3173;51656609]Just curious but what's your opinion on the impressively large majority of Trump supporters that act exactly the same?[/QUOTE] I can usually tell when some of them like to crack a joke about Hillary assassinations or Pizzagate. These really make the bulk of people who just don't mind having a fun time with it. But I think the people who take that stuff seriously start to fall apart in credibility the more they dive deeper and have to redact earlier parts. The people on the Trump side that say, "Fuck it if it's fake, the shills/normies won't be able to handle this." have always pissed me off. Now there is a argument to be had about how harmful the it is when the people who don't take it seriously and keep propagating it are, but my answer to that is people need to get more informed and knowledgeable to decipher this incredible amount of noise being created.

[QUOTE=Tudd;51656213]Ah yes my bad, it only got reposted on here a minute ago. People only take the Golden Showers by multiple prostitutes on a bed that Obama once slept in part seriously.[/QUOTE] The irony is surreal dude. You have actually achieved "surreality".

[QUOTE=Tudd;51656655]I can usually tell when some of them like to crack a joke about Hillary assassinations or Pizzagate. These really make the bulk of people who just don't mind having a fun time with it. But I think the people who take that stuff seriously start to fall apart in credibility the more they dive deeper and have to redact earlier parts. The people on the Trump side that say, "Fuck it if it's fake, the shills/normies won't be able to handle this." have always pissed me off. Now there is a argument to be had about how harmful the it is when the people who don't take it seriously and keep propagating it are, but my answer to that is people need to get more informed and knowledgeable to decipher this incredible amount of noise being created.[/QUOTE] Most people here, contrary to the majority of your posts here, aren't going "This is super real and super true". When back when Pizzagate was a deal, you didn't have the same criticism of people falling for that. Based on your bias. It's pretty hard to parse all this out without having a very real laugh or two because it's genuinely confusing.

[QUOTE=UK Bohemian;51656604]wow, because you disagree with his point of view?[/QUOTE] I'm guessing you just ignored this whole post: [QUOTE=Govna;51656512]That's the point: he's not actually debating, he's just trolling. Logical fallacy after logical fallacy, a selective memory for details, etc. I mean, it's not my call at the end of the day. But it does get tiresome to the point of being infuriating, as you said. There's no reason for it at all.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51656663]I can do the same though "most Clinton supporters were acting exacly that way during most of the campaign" but how about some examples or facts?[/QUOTE] If you can't tell, while my answer was valid I wasn't taking your request seriously at all. You are one of the very few people here I have zero interest in even attempting to debate. Mostly because a debate with you isn't actually a debate. [QUOTE=Tudd;51656655]I can usually tell when some of them like to crack a joke about Hillary assassinations or Pizzagate. These really make the bulk of people who just don't mind having a fun time with it. But I think the people who take that stuff seriously start to fall apart in credibility the more they dive deeper and have to redact earlier parts. The people on the Trump side that say, "Fuck it if it's fake, the shills/normies won't be able to handle this." have always pissed me off. Now there is a argument to be had about how harmful the it is when the people who don't take it seriously and keep propagating it are, but my answer to that is people need to get more informed and knowledgeable to decipher this incredible amount of noise being created.[/QUOTE] I do have to agree with HumanAbyss' post but thanks for at least answering seriously and reasonably.

[QUOTE=Cructo;51656663]I can do the same though "most Clinton supporters were acting exacly that way during most of the campaign" but how about some examples or facts?[/QUOTE] let's see, there was wystan who was for torture and wanted women to have "consequences" for having sex by making abortion illegal, there was our man SaltyWaters who went completely fucking bonkers and posted a weird rant in the RC, our bro Pvt Martin who sent insulting messages targeting another user after his perma through a mouthpiece and cackled about Trump winning the election, after going completely bonkers when Bernie lost, a number of minor trumpets who behaved in a disgusting manner after Trump's victory by going around insulting everybody else and calling them names, and those are just a few names.

[QUOTE=Zonesylvania;51656716]let's see, there was wystan who was for torture and wanted women to have "consequences" for having sex by making abortion illegal, there was our man SaltyWaters who went completely fucking bonkers and posted a weird rant in the RC, our bro Pvt Martin who sent insulting messages targeting another user after his perma through a mouthpiece and cackled about Trump winning the election, after going completely bonkers when Bernie lost, a number of minor trumpets who behaved in a disgusting manner after Trump's victory by going around insulting everybody else and calling them names, and those are just a few names.[/QUOTE] Don't forget newcomer Komodoh who drops a shitpost in SH threads and doesn't bother to substantiate his arguements ever.

[QUOTE=ALurker;51656671]I'm guessing you just ignored this whole post:[/QUOTE] it's an opinion, based on the fact he doesn't agree with tudd's point of view, so no I didn't ignore it.

[QUOTE=Cructo;51656757]3 users in a congregation of Cliton supporters. Hardly a sample of "most" Trump supporters though I guess you tried at least?[/QUOTE] Sorry I don't feel like taking the time to compile a complete list of shitty Trump supporters, which save for two or three who actually tried to be reasonable, were universally shit when it came to trying to defend undefendable decisions.

tudd's an ass but he hasnt really done anything worthy of a perma, its not like he's flaming or harassing people like the other trump supporters on FP that have been permabanned

[QUOTE=TheMrFailz;51656585]Probably l8 because reading through 20 pages is not fun and I'm only on the first couple but: Putin uses his dirt to impeach trump so that Pence becomes president and destroys America.[/QUOTE] Hypothetically, Russia's endgame is not to impeach Trump and plunge the country into chaos, but rather keep him on a string and do Russia's bidding - i.e. overturning sanctions on Ukraine and increasing dependence on Russian oil via SecState Tillerson, former CEO of ExxonMobile. If Russia wanted Trump impeached, we'd already be reading the gory details of Trump's illegal business dealings in China - and yes, Trump's hoes pissing all over the Ritz Carlton if such a thing actually occurred. Again hypothetically, Russia's only course of action for the time being is to maintain plausible deniability.

[QUOTE=Zonesylvania;51656716]let's see, there was wystan who was for torture and wanted women to have "consequences" for having sex by making abortion illegal, there was our man SaltyWaters who went completely fucking bonkers and posted a weird rant in the RC, our bro Pvt Martin who sent insulting messages targeting another user after his perma through a mouthpiece and cackled about Trump winning the election, after going completely bonkers when Bernie lost, a number of minor trumpets who behaved in a disgusting manner after Trump's victory by going around insulting everybody else and calling them names, and those are just a few names.[/QUOTE] this comes across as a playground rant, you might need to get out more.. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Why Reply" - rilez))[/highlight] [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Extended" - rilez))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=UK Bohemian;51656786]this comes across as a playground rant, you might need to get out more..[/QUOTE] Except what he described was true for the people he named. Not sure what your argument here is instead of passively insulting Zone here. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Why Reply" - rilez))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=UK Bohemian;51656786]this comes across as a playground rant, you might need to get out more..[/QUOTE] someone literally asked for a list of shitty trump supporters and he gave a short list of them nice fucking argument there tho, fucking love this tactic [quote]"prove to me that climate change is real" *presents 1 paragraph long response that includes a ton of reliable citations* "lol fucking nerd, you care too much lol. you need to get out more"[/quote] [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Why Reply" - rilez))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=UK Bohemian;51656786]this comes across as a playground rant, you might need to get out more..[/QUOTE] Yeah because me stating some facts didnt fall in line with your feelings, like the couple dozen times I was called a cuck by Trump supporters on the forum trying to get their side of the story, and got sent pms about being part of CTR. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Why Reply" - rilez))[/highlight]

Snup

[QUOTE=Zonesylvania;51656716]let's see, there was wystan who was for torture and wanted women to have "consequences" for having sex by making abortion illegal, there was our man SaltyWaters who went completely fucking bonkers and posted a weird rant in the RC, our bro Pvt Martin who sent insulting messages targeting another user after his perma through a mouthpiece and cackled about Trump winning the election, after going completely bonkers when Bernie lost, a number of minor trumpets who behaved in a disgusting manner after Trump's victory by going around insulting everybody else and calling them names, and those are just a few names.[/QUOTE] It's not like the Clinton supporters were class acts though, several of them were already practically creaming themselves how hard they could lay it into some pro-Trump supporters. Hell, some of them literally wrote small stories on how hard the breakdown for the pro-Trump posters here would be. Not only for the more rude posters, but also the posters who had been very civil throughout. I can post an example of it if you'd like. After all, those posters were convinced that the election was already finished before it even began, after all, their golden boy smurfy convinced them all that there was no way Clinton was going to let this one slip, and that they could even turn Texas red. For me, waking up the morning after the election was really something special. I took only a small nap in that night after Trump nabbed Florida by the skin of his teeth, and woke up to Trump winning Pennsylvania with a margin largely obtained by a minority group in the USA going out en masse to vote for Trump in that state, with the election night thread having the general vibe of a mausoleum. There were not many Trump supporters in that thread at that moment, they were probably out having a great night out there, only a lot of breakdowns from people who had to see their preferred candidate not even turning up to concede. And here I thought that they would hold their words before election night and admit defeat at least a bit gracefully. They really didn't. At least we got a bunch of very entertaining toxxes out of it. EDIT: Apparently we should drop this discussion right now while I was typing this out.

So to get back on topic (I think this section needs a huge cleanup, jesus christ): [URL="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38586626"]http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38586626[/URL] [QUOTE]The BBC understands they are based on memos provided to an independent organisation opposed to Mr Trump by a former member of Britain's MI6, Christopher Steele. Mr Steele is a director of Orbis - which describes itself as a leading corporate intelligence company. He did not respond to a request for comment. Sources say the CIA regards the memos as "credible". The original intention was to derail Mr Trump's candidacy, reports say. [B] The BBC first saw the documents in October but has been unable to verify the claims included. Several material inaccuracies have been highlighted.[/B] However, past work by the British operative was considered by US intelligence to be reliable, US media say.[/QUOTE] Interesting part highlighted in bold; these documents have been here for a while. This has been a thing before Trump was elected.

[QUOTE=BlackMageMari;51656828]So to get back on topic (I think this section needs a huge cleanup, jesus christ): [URL="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38586626"]http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38586626[/URL] Interesting part highlighted in bold; these documents have been here for a while. This has been a thing before Trump was elected.[/QUOTE] Apparently this invalidates /pol/'s story. Perhaps it is legitimiate after all. If so, we're screwed really. I just hope US intelligence is better than they are in Homeland.