Intelligence Officials: Russians may have Compromising Information on Trump - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Duck M.;51652218]Can we stop sourcing /pol/ or even talking about them in this thread lol[/QUOTE] Well, I wouldn't go [I]that[/I] far. If there is valid and compelling evidence (meaning, not just "we faked the story" screencaps) that this was faked, we need to know. However, I agree that we need more to go on than just people on 4Chan implying that they faked it without [I]other[/I] notable evidence to correlate with it.

if the president has to make a public speech saying he didn't hire prostitutes to piss on a bed in front of him within the first month of entering office, i might have to kill myself

[QUOTE=Lambeth;51652168]I dunno buzzfeed might not be great but I don't want another billionaire to take down the free media like gawker.[/QUOTE] You must be incredibly dense if you think Thiel wasn't justified in bankrolling Hogan.

[QUOTE=Duck M.;51652234]On what basis?[/QUOTE] On the basis that the article is sketchy for even Buzzfeed standards, according to their publisher's twitter. That and the fact the INTERNATIONAL SPY ORGANIZATIONS SECRET DOCUMENTS have no censorship or verification from either MI6 or the FBI.

The MI6 agent was reported to be someone hired by multiple campaigns as a PI. The fact the person is not named is annoying but it's unlikely to be the work of 4chan.

[QUOTE=Stroheim;51652223]"The Great Bamboozle: How the Internet Hate Machine influenced years of American policy" [editline]10th January 2017[/editline] Because it's looking more and more like a fake report[/QUOTE] How is looking more and more fake? Information has not come out for either side Believing /pol/ posters who claimed they did it is a dumb idea. Wait for more information first, it won't be hard to figure this out once these officials look into their sources.

[QUOTE=BlindSniper17;51652237]Well, I wouldn't go [I]that[/I] far. If there is valid and compelling evidence (meaning, not just "we faked the story" screencaps) that this was faked, we need to know. However, I agree that we need more to go on than just people on 4Chan implying that they faked it without [I]other[/I] notable evidence to correlate with it.[/QUOTE] I have no problem with the concept of /pol/ being involved, but a fucking chanarchive thread or a greentext story doesn't constitute valuable information

Russia could release whatever they want, Trump will just puff up and say 'WRONG' and his supporters will back him no matter what. They'll only listen to the part that says he hates Obama and praise him for it.

[QUOTE=DuCT;51652245]You must be incredibly dense if you think Thiel wasn't justified in bankrolling Hogan.[/QUOTE] It's a case of everything being shit but one being slightly less shit. whichever that one is depends on your own personal principles.

[QUOTE=SelfishDragon;51652250]How is looking more and more fake? Information has not come out for either side Believing /pol/ posters who claimed they did it is a dumb idea. Wait for more information first, it won't be hard to figure this out once these officials look into their sources.[/QUOTE] its "looking more and more fake" because thats the narrative the insanely obvious /pol/ster is trying to push

[QUOTE=Stroheim;51652246]On the basis that the article is sketchy for even Buzzfeed standards, according to their publishers. [/QUOTE] I'll let everyone know to stop pursuing the story on the basis of it being "sketchy"

[QUOTE=Duck M.;51652252]I have no problem with the concept of /pol/ being involved, but a fucking chanarchive thread or a greentext story doesn't constitute valuable information[/QUOTE] On that, I agree fully.

[QUOTE=The Calzone;51652261]its "looking more and more fake" because thats the narrative the insanely obvious /pol/ster is trying to push[/QUOTE] First off, that's because it is starting to look that way. Second, I don't go on /pol/. If did go on /pol/ I would have called you names by now.

I don't necessarily think that the report is true, and a certain amount of skepticism is healthy. However, there hasn't been anything credible presented to discredit it, especially not on 4chan.

[QUOTE=Stroheim;51652281]First off, that's because it is. Second, I don't go on /pol/.[/QUOTE] Then why are you posting /pol/ screenshots, saying "kek," and named after a nazi?

I'm all for a healthy sense of skepticism but constantly going after the Buzzfeed article when there's multiple other sources at the very least heavily implying something sketchy has happened kind of strikes me as a weakest man type of thing

[QUOTE=Stroheim;51652281]First off, that's because it is. Second, I don't go on /pol/.[/QUOTE] "It just is." Okay. I'm open to the idea it's a hoax but this whole thing could go either way right now, no new information is coming out, nobody knows how this is going to turn out, what super secret information are you privy to that wasn't posted in green text on /pol/? lmao. You deciding 4chan was behind it all along doesn't mean that's what's happened.

[QUOTE=Stroheim;51652281]First off, that's because it is starting to look that way. Second, I don't go on /pol/. If did go on /pol/ I would have called you names by now.[/QUOTE] Ok, where do you get your information from?

tbh whether this is real or not I'm still gonna call him President Pissbaby

[QUOTE=Duck M.;51652295]Ok, where do you get your information from?[/QUOTE] Got the screenshot from Reddit, and the rest from personal beliefs. I legitimately think that the MI6/Buzzfeed thing was a joke by /pol/ [QUOTE=The Calzone;51652291]Then why are you posting /pol/ screenshots, saying "kek," and named after a nazi?[/QUOTE] Because I thought it was funny and informative to what /pol/ wanted to believe with the MI6 officer. I'm named this way because just like Swebonny, I liked the name. [sp]and also because Guile is Bae in SF and Jojo's okay but that's besides the point[/sp] Here's a question for you now, why are you named after a Italian food?

If this is how 2017 is starting I have to wonder how 2018 will be

[QUOTE=Duck M.;51652287]I don't necessarily think that the report is true, and a certain amount of skepticism is healthy. However, there hasn't been anything credible presented to discredit it, especially not on 4chan.[/QUOTE] America needs to investigate Trump's piss fetish and conflicts of interest to the best of it's ability.

Beautiful iconography developing here; his association with yellow/gold/orange plays perfectly into this piss-play imagery. What a beautifully artful time to be alive, true or false.

[QUOTE=Stroheim;51652312]Got the screenshot from Reddit, and the rest from personal beliefs[/QUOTE] I'll ask which subreddit you got an archived /pol/ thread and screenshot from but I have a feeling I already have a pretty good idea

[QUOTE=Duck M.;51652327]I'll ask which subreddit you got an archived /pol/ thread and screenshot from but I have a feeling I already have a pretty good idea[/QUOTE] Sorry it was on the front page? Also what archived thread are you talking about? That was posted by someone else on here.

[QUOTE=Lambeth;51652260]It's a case of everything being shit but one being slightly less shit. whichever that one is depends on your own personal principles.[/QUOTE] Hogan/Thiel is/was nowhere near the level of shittery that Gawker did to them, and in the amount of shit Gawker did in general, or how shittier they would go during the trial.

[QUOTE=Duck M.;51652327]I'll ask which subreddit you got an archived /pol/ thread and screenshot from but I have a feeling I already have a pretty good idea[/QUOTE] [t]http://i.imgur.com/UWCd76v.png[/t] [url]https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5n8yd9/when_you_never_verify_anything_because_youre_fake/[/url] oh dear so that's where he got it from [QUOTE=Stroheim;51652333]Sorry it was on the front page?[/QUOTE] front page aka "I'm subscribed to r/the_donald", it's not even on r/all

[QUOTE=Stroheim;51652333]Sorry it was on the front page? Also what archived thread are you talking about? That was posted by someone else on here.[/QUOTE] Got you mixed up with tudd on the archived thread, my b Also, the front page is comprised of all different subs, was it in the /r/politics megathread?

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51652339][t]http://i.imgur.com/UWCd76v.png[/t] [url]https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5n8yd9/when_you_never_verify_anything_because_youre_fake/[/url] oh dear so that's where he got it from front page aka "I'm subscribed to r/the_donald", it's not even on r/all[/QUOTE] It was on /r/all. Keyword being [U][B]W A S[/B][/U]

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51652339][t]http://i.imgur.com/UWCd76v.png[/t] [url]https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5n8yd9/when_you_never_verify_anything_because_youre_fake/[/url] oh dear so that's where he got it from front page aka "I'm subscribed to r/the_donald", it's not even on r/all[/QUOTE] Hey my hunch was correct, can't believe it