Neogaf's SJWs defeated: Lucky Chloe is coming to Tekken 7 in North America - Polidicks

Of course he wouldn't replace Chloe with Big Bald Angry Muscle Man, because if he truly did, we would have TWO marduks on the roster.

[QUOTE=blerb;46854517]All because SJW was in the title. Why do people on FP oppose the use of it? It's the title most SJWs identify with. Hell, one of the orginal "Gamers Are Dead" article writers called himself a "Social Justice Druid". I mean, if you're a moderate feminist/SJW who is offended by the negative connotations then I can understand, but otherwise I find it hard to understand the problem.[/QUOTE] I thought they were using SJW ironically as in "people call me SJW so to make them mad I will call myself SJW too." No?

[QUOTE=blerb;46854517] It's the title most SJWs identify with. Hell, one of the orginal "Gamers Are Dead" article writers called himself a "Social Justice Druid". [/QUOTE] It's was a failed attempt to 'reclaim' the term. It failed because the inherent irony of this 'title' flew way above their heads: how can a person who believes in social justice be a "warrior" when most of the social justice movements are based on [b]non-violence[/b]? That's oxymoron.

So why exactly were people up in arms about this? She seems like a J-Pop idol to me which isn't something to get worked up about.

[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;46853623]"beta males"?[/QUOTE] The type of males that get friendzoned and will follow a female's ideals no matter how wrong they are, in hopes of sex.

[QUOTE=GÃ©za!;46853580]Because gamers have no will or opinions of their own and so such depictions of women will invariably turn them into sexists.[/QUOTE] most of the backlash was because people found the character to be generic and annoying, not because of any political agenda.

[QUOTE=blerb;46854517]All because SJW was in the title. Why do people on FP oppose the use of it? It's the title most SJWs identify with. Hell, one of the orginal "Gamers Are Dead" article writers called himself a "Social Justice Druid". I mean, if you're a moderate feminist/SJW who is offended by the negative connotations then I can understand, but otherwise I find it hard to understand the problem.[/QUOTE] Its like memes Eventually, fp gets tired of it and starts despising.

[QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;46855603]Its like memes Eventually, fp gets tired of it and starts despising.[/QUOTE] FP? There are places where SJW as a term is accepted?

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46854099]There are actually quite a few people who took it above and beyond just a tool to insult people. For example, there was this guy from that bodybuilding forum who was involved in some sort of mass shooting or conspiracy to cause a mass shooting who had a major "I am the alpha male, I am going to murder these beta fucks" attitude or something like that.[/QUOTE] Ok Anita Sarkeesian. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/6xKwfST.png[/IMG]

[QUOTE=blerb;46854517]All because SJW was in the title. Why do people on FP oppose the use of it? It's the title most SJWs identify with. Hell, one of the orginal "Gamers Are Dead" article writers called himself a "Social Justice Druid". I mean, if you're a moderate feminist/SJW who is offended by the negative connotations then I can understand, but otherwise I find it hard to understand the problem.[/QUOTE] It's mostly been overused to the point where it's starting to lose actual meaning, or is becoming a boogeyman.

[QUOTE=Diet Kane;46855823]It's mostly been overused to the point where it's starting to lose actual meaning, or is becoming a boogeyman.[/QUOTE] how is it a boogeyman when you can go on neogaf and see a whole sea of them?

[QUOTE=codemaster85;46855853]how is it a boogeyman when you can go on neogaf and see a whole sea of them?[/QUOTE] I mean in terms of using it. When people on twitter refer to the AntiGG simply as just "the SJWs" it gets tiring. Just call them what they are: first world privileged crazy white people

[QUOTE=Diet Kane;46855860] Just call them what they are: first world privileged crazy white people[/QUOTE] Implying non-white people can't be anti GG? Racist.

id be interested in tekken if it was a bald muscular woman tbh but i guess thats not gonna happen!! gonna have to stay with dead or alive then

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46853594]you can't be serious lol wait are you[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46782118]As a Canadian I am going to remain gender-neutral about this upcoming gun debate[/QUOTE]

"OMG TEKKEN IS RUINED!! NOT THIS CHARAACCTTERRR! MOM MAKE IT STOOPP!" Fuckin Neogaf is filled with brats

[QUOTE=Diet Kane;46855860]I mean in terms of using it. When people on twitter refer to the AntiGG simply as just "the SJWs" it gets tiring. Just call them what they are: first world privileged crazy white people[/QUOTE] or you can call them sjws for short. The only reason its considered a joke is because they pushed for it to be labeled as one.

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46854075] I'm just over-exaggerating the fact that there are a sizable amount of bigots here.[/QUOTE] I'm presuming you're one of them. Or is the definition of bigot: someone that disagrees with ROFLBURGER's (ignorant) viewpoint?

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46853791]woolio please you're moving the spotlight away from someone who used "beta males" in a sentence non-ironically I can't sleep knowing that no one cares when facepunch is moving farther and farther right every day[/QUOTE] Dang, I almost forgot the right is full of nazis and objectively wrong, not just a different political view!

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46853791]woolio please you're moving the spotlight away from someone who used "beta males" in a sentence non-ironically I can't sleep knowing that no one cares when facepunch is moving farther and farther right every day[/QUOTE] If thinking video games shouldn't be sensored is a right wing view then I'm going to vote Conservative...

Frankly I don't want a forum that's purely leaning in one political direction. I'm not even sure why anyone wants that unless they truly think they already have all the possible correct answers to complicated real world problems.

[QUOTE=Korova;46853583]overzealous first world feminists and [B]white males who suffer from privilege guilt[/B] fighting for realistic proportions/portrayals of digital women in video games is too long for the title.[/QUOTE] I think that sounds better then "beta males", no?

[QUOTE=Korova;46853583]overzealous first world feminists and beta males fighting for realistic proportions/portrayals of digital women in video games is too long for the title.[/QUOTE] Would I be wasting me time saying that the whole first world feminist thing is wrong? For the billionth fucking time these people are not feminists, this is not feminism. Until people identify this the problem is not going away because if your point of few on a feminist issue is anti feminist you are by definition sexist (or misogynistic as Sarkessian would say).

I don't get why people get so hot and bothered over this sort of thing. I mean, the implication I'm getting here is that it's a requirement to have realistic portrayals of anatomy in games, which are pure fantasy. Reality is boring, stop forcing your "norms" and "privilege" on my fantasies. Or rather, the fantasies of the creative directors of games. [QUOTE=LtKyle2;46856348]I think that sounds better then "beta males", no?[/QUOTE] I associate as a strong monkeykin male space ape, and if you say I'm not, you're oppressing me and you need to check your privilege.

[QUOTE=Diet Kane;46855860]I mean in terms of using it. When people on twitter refer to the AntiGG simply as just "the SJWs" it gets tiring. Just call them what they are: first world privileged crazy white people[/QUOTE] ...why not call them sjw instead? God, its like people are pissed off at the term or something.

[QUOTE=Diet Kane;46855860] Just call them what they are: first world privileged crazy white people[/QUOTE] Unfortunate for that idea I live in the first world, I'm white, privileged and can't go a day without being called crazy. But I've made it clear I'm opposed to the 'viewpoints' of the SJWs. I think we should call them Not Feminists, you know just to make sure everyone knows they're... not feminists.

[QUOTE=Rossy167;46856378]Would I be wasting me time saying that the whole first world feminist thing is wrong? For the billionth fucking time these people are not feminists, this is not feminism. Until people identify this the problem is not going away because if your point of few on a feminist issue is anti feminist you are by definition sexist (or misogynistic as Sarkessian would say).[/QUOTE] No true scotsman. We can't fix that there's people that identify as feminists that you don't think are, it's something you have to fix.

[QUOTE=HoodedSniper;46855735]Ok Anita Sarkeesian. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/6xKwfST.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] I now remembered the name. Look up Elliot Rodger, he was the type of person who took this whole Alpha Male thing very seriously. He also had a shitty opinion towards women [img]http://i.imgur.com/myJq0lJ.png[/img] Here's his manifesto too [url]http://abclocal.go.com/three/kabc/kabc/My-Twisted-World.pdf[/url] just Ctrl+F "Alpha"

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46856625]I now remembered the name. Look up Elliot Rodger, he was the type of person who took this whole Alpha Male thing very seriously. He also had a shitty opinion towards women [img]http://i.imgur.com/myJq0lJ.png[/img] Here's his manifesto too [url]http://abclocal.go.com/three/kabc/kabc/My-Twisted-World.pdf[/url] just Ctrl+F "Alpha"[/QUOTE] yeah, so what? Crazy people take shit too far, so we have to remove any and all traces of what you call "alpha" or "masculinity" to save ourselves? What are you going to say the next time someone radicalizes something relatively normal? And the next time? And the time after that? And what are you going to do when you've finally called for a stop to all behaviour because ALL THINGS WE DO ARE CAPABLE OF BEING RADICALIZED BY INSANE PEOPLE. I'm sorry to caps lock yell at you, but honestly man, I'm more scared we're entering a world of "No, you're offensive or scary, you can't have your personality or the things you like, and no one else can either" because that's exactly where it looks like we're going. It's a mindset divorced from reality and will do nothing but cause harm and waste our time on this planet.

[QUOTE=LtKyle2;46856348]I think that sounds better then "beta males", no?[/QUOTE] That's not even accurate and you're just being silly. A more appropriate title is: people who are offended easily get offended over thing.