Ubisoft hints at future of Far Cry in Select Poll - Polidicks

They need a setting that shakes up how the game is played. Like the vertical aspects in FC4.

Why not put in everything, really make the game burn my eyes out with such majesty and awe.

A Far Cry game in remote Alaska about surviving extreme wilderness I don't know about Far Cry but I'd love some Alaska sandbox survival game.

I've been looking for a new vietnam game for quite some time now... and Far Cry 5 would be the perfect substitute for that. Imagine how sicknasty the soundtrack would be....

[QUOTE=proch;46863211]A Far Cry game in remote Alaska about surviving extreme wilderness I don't know about Far Cry but I'd love some Alaska sandbox survival game.[/QUOTE] The Long Dark.

[QUOTE=CaptainObvious1;46861879]The Shangri La story wasn't that good in all honesty. The Vietnam war would seem a bit similar to Kyrat too.[/QUOTE] I could see Nam working if it was made well though. A conflict between the Vietnameese, the US going on "in the background", military police all over the place, 60's music, the occasional plane and chopper roaring by, dynamic firefights and battles between the two sides, all that stuff. Generally what I'm saying, if they could do a well written [I]and[/I] well designed 'Nam game It'd be great, but if it was just Far Cry 3/4 with Millitary Police then fuck no.

Please, for the love of god, don't make a western/sci fi/survival game with radio towers. I have climbed more radio towers in open world games than one person should ever have to.

[QUOTE=spekter;46861822]Please please please please Blood Dragon 2 sequel[/QUOTE] Blood Dragon was great for many reasons. But one of them was the novelty. Ubisoft fucking loves making franchises. Let's not have them franchise a great one off. More absurd games, definitely. Far Cry 5: Attack from Planet X. Weird stuff that lets the writers and designers go wild with it. That's what I really want.

[QUOTE=Number-41;46862176]I'd rather see the distinction between good and evil disappear a bit (more), maybe allow you to choose if you're a good or bad guy. In FC4 it was just the cliché totalitarian/militaristic regime guys versus the poor locals, same with FC3.[/QUOTE] FC4 ending spoilers: [sp]I don't know, meeting Amita/Sabal after the credits actually makes the line separating good and evil completely nonexistent, because both Amita and Sabal turn out to be even bigger assholes than the entire Royal Army. Amita's forcing kids to become child soldiers and Sabal is committing some kinda religious genocide.[/sp] On topic, a 'Nam Far Cry sounds pretty damn good to me.

Please make a Spaghetti Western style Far Cry.

[QUOTE=DudesonFan;46863787]FC4 ending spoilers: [sp]I don't know, meeting Amita/Sabal after the credits actually makes the line separating good and evil completely nonexistent because both Amita and Sabal turn out to be even bigger assholes than the entire Royal Army. Amita's forcing kids to become child soldiers and Sabal is committing some kinda religious genocide.[/sp][/QUOTE] Yes but you still get bad karma if you kill civilians (and elephants), bloodthirsty civilians for that matter if you keep the arena stuff in mind, so I wouldn't even classify [I]them[/I] as having such high morals. Maybe they should've introduced a poachers faction so killing elephants (and civilians trying to stop you) might be frowned upon but it's still a viable playstyle :v: It's hard to unite with the main story, but I didn't like it that much anyway. All I'm saying is that even though it's a free roam game, you are still forced to stay friendly to one faction and murder the other. And I had a hard time connecting with either. It also had a couple of 'filler' missions in the main quest (disabling the guns, didn't advance the story at all) and the game helps you too much (e.g. snipers being shown with a convenient bright red laserline, the wallhack thing if you mark 'em makes it also too easy, quest indicators pointing to the exact location of something you're supposed to search, ...) They have the design down (beautiful game, very nice eye for detail), but gameplay-wise I didn't feel satisfied, but that's just my opinion.

[QUOTE=AntonioR;46861954]Would you guys want Far Cry to become an annual release like Assassin's Creed (with all the potential problems that comes with it) or should they release one every 2-3 years so it doesn't become stale too quickly ?[/QUOTE] Every year. The sooner we run everything Ubisoft into the ground, the sooner Ubisoft goes out of business and the employees there with actual talent can be rescued. We all know that the Ubisoft art department is probably kept in cages on sight.

[QUOTE=Robber;46863584]Please, for the love of god, don't make a western/sci fi/survival game with radio towers. I have climbed more radio towers in open world games than one person should ever have to.[/QUOTE] Okay, in the Western game you'll be climbing telegraph towers. Happy now?

[QUOTE]A Far Cry game where you can fight against or join vampires A Far Cry game in the Spaghetti Western style set in the late 19th century Americas A Far Cry game that is set during a zombie outbreak A Far Cry game in the present day on a Jurassic Park style island of dinosaurs[/QUOTE] I want all these.

the more outlandish the setting the better, personally i find modern realistic believable settings kinda dull.

Mad Max, Sci-Fi, and Jurassic Park Anything other than those 3 is wrong. [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Stopper;46863357]The Long Dark.[/QUOTE] Fucking this. The long dark will make you feel [I]cold.[/I] Fantastic game.

here's a possible advantage with dinosaurs and the engine, if they use the hollow earth from the journey to the center of the earth then they could partition the inverted world into large maps and connect them through on foot. Then if you want to look at a destination far away you just have to look up.

Max Max and Sci-Fi Far Cry please.

[QUOTE=RichyZ;46864085]2 of those settings are so overused tho western vampires however is a setting that is timeless and could be enjoyed for centuries to come[/QUOTE] who cares if they're overused, in a farcry game they can be fantastic, and we certainly don't have enough good zombie or post apoc games to play.

Dinosaurs please. There are so little actual good dinosaur games.

Far Cry game in the present day on a Jurassic Park style island of dinosaurs? Dude. Also Blood Dragon 2 with more rex powercolt NEEDS to be a thing

alaska or vietnam or i'm not buying [editline]6th January 2015[/editline] for real though a far cry in vietnam would be fucking stellar i mean the jungle environment is stale as hell, but the addition of mountains and large cities would be neat imagine being a third party contractor who can take missions from the US as well as the NVA and the soviets essentially first person mercenaries: playground of destruction

Judging from the way they did blood dragon, they could probably pull off one that is a mix of a Spaghetti Western and a steampunk/oldschool technology aesthetic to make for some really cool scenarios.

I'm really hoping they go with Peru. The landscapes and mountains up there could be stunning, and there's a lot of room for interesting culture without diverging too far into the crazy-fantasy shit that took over series like Saints Row.

[QUOTE=.Isak.;46866635]I'm really hoping they go with Peru. The landscapes and mountains up there could be stunning, and there's a lot of room for interesting culture without diverging too far into the crazy-fantasy shit that took over series like Saints Row.[/QUOTE] Wonder why never did a game with Argentina Like We have all the possibles landscapes: Jungles, mountains, desert, prairie, cities, forests, tundra, etc etc

Ubisoft could hint at curing cancer and I wouldn't give a shit.

Alaska plz. Of course "Alaska" will be coated in minarets, radio towers, and ctOS transmitters for that authentic Ubisoft feel

a far cry game set on an alien planet in the first days of their turn-of-the-century-industrialization-phase

I would pre-order the next Far Cry game if it was set in the Vietnam war. Okay, maybe that's an exaggeration.