Just Seeing Hillary Clinton's Face Improves Women's Public Speaking - Polidicks

What do you guys expect on a forum for kids and neck beards? [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Flaming / trolling" - MaxOfS2D))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=omggrass;40373620]men always talk about looks and the like without any real seriousness. women on the other hand, pull out box cutters and slice away at people with pure zeal and full seriousness. anyone remember the study on aggressiveness and gender? let me break it down. Men only = pretty peaceful, men + women = people being extremely aggressive. however when it's women only there is the same amount of aggressiveness as the group with men AND women. food for thought.[/QUOTE] Probably a shit poorly designed study. This one is too from the looks of it, but welp w/e

[QUOTE=omggrass;40373620]Men only = pretty peaceful, men + women = people being extremely aggressive. however when it's women only there is the same amount of aggressiveness as the group with men AND women. food for thought.[/QUOTE] But this contradicts the biotruths that I heard about men being the hunters and women the gatherers! [IMG]http://fi.somethingawful.com/images/smilies/confused.gif[/IMG]

[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;40373730]But this contradicts the biotruths that I heard about men being the hunters and women the gatherers! [IMG]http://fi.somethingawful.com/images/smilies/confused.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE] Well up until about 100kya, no division of labour existed among hominids. Neanderthal men and women did the same tasks as each other, and both participated in hunting/toolmaking/etc. Homo Sapiens was the first to begin dividing up labour, starting initially by sex.

[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;40373730]But this contradicts the biotruths that I heard about men being the hunters and women the gatherers! [IMG]http://fi.somethingawful.com/images/smilies/confused.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE] that wasn't the point. the point i was making is that men and women almost always judge people vocally, the difference is how aggressive it is.

[QUOTE=omggrass;40373773]that wasn't the point. the point i was making is that men and women almost always judge people vocally, the difference is how aggressive it is.[/QUOTE] what does this have to do with anything jesus christ [editline]22nd April 2013[/editline] just because the thread is about a woman doesn't mean its time to start posting fun facts about why women are inferior

[QUOTE=Kopimi;40373779]what does this have to do with anything jesus christ [editline]22nd April 2013[/editline] just because the thread is about a woman doesn't mean its time to start posting fun facts about why women are inferior[/QUOTE] obviously you didn't read the first 6-7 posts about people judging others. please read the thread for context.

[QUOTE=omggrass;40373620]men always talk about looks and the like without any real seriousness. women on the other hand, pull out box cutters and slice away at people with pure zeal and full seriousness. anyone remember the study on aggressiveness and gender? let me break it down. Men only = pretty peaceful, men + women = people being extremely aggressive. however when it's women only there is the same amount of aggressiveness as the group with men AND women. food for thought.[/QUOTE] I want to see this study, since the most horrid things I have ever heard have been from college frat guys. References to having sex with drunk passed out girls, calling them sluts, hating women who do not do what they want... etc.

[QUOTE=omggrass;40373800]obviously you didn't read the 1st 6-7 posts about people judging others. please read the thread for context.[/QUOTE] Your post with "food for thought" didn't even make sense. If you are claiming that males are less aggressive than women, this is patently false. The opposite holds true.

Requesting a thread lock

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40373820]Your post with "food for thought" didn't even make sense. If you are claiming that males are less aggressive than women, this is patently false. The opposite holds true.[/QUOTE] go read some literature like Biology Does Not Make Men More Aggressive Than Women by David Adams in Of Mice and Women: Aspects of Female Aggression K. Bjorkvist and P. Niemela (eds.), Academic Press, Inc. 1992, Pages 17-25 and [url]http://lilt.ilstu.edu/mjreese/psy290/downloads/OLeary%202000.pdf[/url]

[QUOTE=omggrass;40373851]go read some literature like Biology Does Not Make Men More Aggressive Than Women by David Adams in Of Mice and Women: Aspects of Female Aggression K. Bjorkvist and P. Niemela (eds.), Academic Press, Inc. 1992, Pages 17-25 and [url]http://lilt.ilstu.edu/mjreese/psy290/downloads/OLeary%202000.pdf[/url][/QUOTE] [img]http://unsafeharbour.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/pinker-violence.jpg?w=584[/img] Pretty much the vast majority of those dead, and those committing the violent acts, are male. Also please go check national crime statistics. Some countries have men committing 90% of violent crimes. Also rape against men by women is practically nonexistent.

Studies of hormone modulation on behavior does actually suggest women would be more aggressive but hth first you have to define the type of aggression you are talking about dude. Physical violence? Social manipulation? etc etc In behavioral studies aggression can have a lot of different meanings. Technically anything that would advance your own social status while putting down another person's is an aggressive action.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40373915][img]http://unsafeharbour.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/pinker-violence.jpg?w=584[/img] Pretty much the vast majority of those dead, and those committing the violent acts, are male. Also please go check national crime statistics. Some countries have men committing 90% of violent crimes. Also rape against men by women is practically nonexistent.[/QUOTE] [quote]Also rape against men by women is practically nonexistent.[/quote] [i][b]fuck you[/b][/i]

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40373915] Also rape against men by women is practically nonexistent.[/QUOTE] Eeeehhh...I wouldn't go that far.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40373915][img]http://unsafeharbour.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/pinker-violence.jpg?w=584[/img] Pretty much the vast majority of those dead, and those committing the violent acts, are male. Also please go check national crime statistics. Some countries have men committing 90% of violent crimes. Also rape against men by women is practically nonexistent.[/QUOTE] rape of men by women is extremely under-reported. also the idea of men being aggressive in wars is pretty funny because at that point it's about survival. i'm talking about aggression in domestic violence and non-preconceived areas. for example woman against woman aggression vs men against men such as in the workplace.

[QUOTE=AJisAwesome15;40373933]Eeeehhh...I wouldn't go that far.[/QUOTE] [quote]The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1997) stated that that 91% of United States people whose rape accusations resulted in convictions against the accused were female and 9% were male. It also stated that 99% of the people convicted of and imprisoned in response to rape accusations were male, with only 1% of those convicted being female.[/quote] [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_gender[/url] 1% conviction rate for females (this including females raping other females too) seems low.

[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;40373923]Studies of hormone modulation on behavior does actually suggest women would be more aggressive but hth first you have to define the type of aggression you are talking about dude. Physical violence? Social manipulation? etc etc In behavioral studies aggression can have a lot of different meanings. Technically anything that would advance your own social status while putting down another person's is an aggressive action.[/QUOTE] i was derping and not specifying the type of aggression. thanks for pointing that out. :)

[QUOTE=omggrass;40373948]rape of men by women is extremely under-reported. also the idea of men being aggressive in wars is pretty funny because at that point it's about survival. i'm talking about aggression in domestic violence and non-preconceived areas.[/QUOTE] So you're talking about social aggression and manipulation, not physical violence. You should've clarified that hth.

What he means to say is that it is extremely uncommon compared to men raping women. Nobody wants to erase women raping men. In order to combat our societal rape problem, more attention is needed in telling men not to rape than anywhere else.

[QUOTE=omggrass;40373948]rape of men by women is extremely under-reported.[/QUOTE] Is it going to be possible for you to be proven wrong?

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40373998]Is it going to be possible for you to be proven wrong?[/QUOTE] are you legitimately using statistics from one of the most under-reported crimes in the world as your argument?

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40373998]Is it going to be possible for you to be proven wrong?[/QUOTE] Lmao the irony dude you are one of the worst for that problem on these fucking forums

this has got to be a new record for fastest completely derailed thread it was dead on arrival

i'm sorry for the de-rail. :(

[QUOTE=Judas;40374011]are you legitimately using statistics from one of the most under-reported crimes in the world as your argument?[/QUOTE] He hasn't really given me anything besides his word. I've cited crime statistics and he cited a source which doesn't even fully agree with him: [quote]J. Archer's (2000) conclusion that women engage in slightly more physical aggression than men in intimate relationships but sustain more injuries is reasonable in representative samples. [B]However, his conclusions will provoke negative reactions because they do not fit with the data and belief that men are generally more aggressive than women. In addition, they are incompatible with observations of professionals who serve battered women.[/B] Basically, the meta-analytic conclusion about aggression cannot be generalized to samples of physically abusive men and their partners. Nonetheless, the studies reviewed by Archer provide convincing data that physical aggression by women must be taken seriously if there is a sincere desire to prevent partner abuse. [/quote]

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40374071]He hasn't really given me anything besides his word. I've cited crime statistics and he cited a source which doesn't even fully agree with him:[/QUOTE] statistics don't instantly mean you're right

[QUOTE=Judas;40374114]statistics don't instantly mean you're right[/QUOTE] I'm less wrong than he is.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40374120]I'm less wrong than he is.[/QUOTE] that isn't even remotely how arguments work

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40374120]I'm less wrong than he is.[/QUOTE] lol looks like something a 5 year old would say