RIAA/NAB: FM Receivers in all your mobile electronics, mandatory
43 replies, posted
I say I hate a lot of things, like vans or ayn rand. But I really do hate the RIAA.
Enjoy the death of radio you lobbying bastards.
[QUOTE=markg06;24140094]Yeah FM is so shit and you can't hear shit :downs:[/QUOTE]
wow, you completely overshot that one. The quality is crap, compared to mp3 in higher bitrates (not sure what you use, but I'm pro mp3 320k or FLAC. You probably still got your shit in mp3 56k.)
Now compare mp3 320 to traditional FM. Not only are you range limited, so you are in risk of frequency overtake; but you also have quality issues regarding the terrain, weather, and other novel variables.
Can you still hear shit? yeah, of course. Is it of better quality than a CD? Or an Mp3? Of fucking course not.
Not sure about you, but I love my music to be in the best quality possible.
Do you understand this still, or are you going to severely overshoot this and think I'm talking about radar?
This is so they can broadcast propaganda when the time comes.
[QUOTE=GodKing;24142351]This is so they can broadcast propaganda when the time comes.[/QUOTE]
...Hmmm you got a point...
This is the same thing as the mandatory digital switch....they are doing it because somebody in these agencies is getting kickbacks from the profits a private company will make when this happens...
I don't want a radio in my:
1. Future Handheld gameplayers
2. Microwave
3. Computer
4. Calculator
The list goes on and on.
[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;24137328]But however, this could be used a spying tool, also, monitoring what you are doing, and how much your are doing of it.[/QUOTE]
how and why
[QUOTE=Richard Simmons;24141377]wow, you completely overshot that one. The quality is crap, compared to mp3 in higher bitrates (not sure what you use, but I'm pro mp3 320k or FLAC. You probably still got your shit in mp3 56k.)
Now compare mp3 320 to traditional FM. Not only are you range limited, so you are in risk of frequency overtake; but you also have quality issues regarding the terrain, weather, and other novel variables.
Can you still hear shit? yeah, of course. Is it of better quality than a CD? Or an Mp3? Of fucking course not.
Not sure about you, but I love my music to be in the best quality possible.
Do you understand this still, or are you going to severely overshoot this and think I'm talking about radar?[/QUOTE]
Lol FLAC, good job I don't give a shit what you post since your opinion just got voided because you wank over FLAC.
As someone who is working towards working in Radio, this is a bit of a dumb deal. Admittedly there's no true alternative to FM yet (DAB and such are terrible).
One that's able to pick up DAB radio in the UK would be fantastic... But FM? No thanks.
[QUOTE=markg06;24152201]Lol FLAC, good job I don't give a shit what you post since your opinion just got voided because you wank over FLAC.[/QUOTE]
I don't 'wank' over flac. I just prefer higher bitrate music. But yet, my music taste constitutes for this.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.