War vet with no legs charged with plot to kill the God Hates Fag protesters
253 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Terragen;26584216]Show me something valid they protest about, then we can talk.[/QUOTE]
Show me where in the constitution it says "The right to protest about valid things"
This is proof that Psychological terror isn't taken seriously. This man is a fucking hero and i thank him for at least showing the WBC that their antagonistic behavior can backfire. He didn't harm them, but he sure as shit drew the line in the sand... and they had passed it years ago.
[editline]9th December 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Xen Tricks;26584260]Show me where in the constitution it says "The right to protest about valid things"[/QUOTE]
I think that is the part where everyone knows that it is what is implied and being an uneducated fuck about your rights is laughable. These guys are uneducated fucks about their rights and so are their supporters/sumpathizers. The legal system is more retarded for not having stitched up the holes that allow retards to cost so many fuckin' money in the long run.
[QUOTE=Snuffy;26577640]I, too, think First Amendment rights should be given only to those who support my views.[/QUOTE]
They are extremely vulgar and deserve to be limited somehow. They even show that they don't want freedom of speech by insulting the dead soldiers that fight for their rights to say things like that.
Eh, they would have had it coming anyways.
I find it quite hilarious how people complain about the Westboro Baptist Church, but they never do shit.
I have an idea, if a Westboro member has a son/daughter that serves in the army, and then they die, how about protesting that the world hates morons/racists/attention whores in front of that funeral?
That'll give them a taste of their own medicine [b]and[/b] you would probably get support in doing so. Thus leaving no violence and conveying a message to the Westboro members to keep their beliefs to themselves.
As much as I hate WBC gunning them down is not the right answer. They have the freedom of speech as much as we do.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;26584874]This is proof that Psychological terror isn't taken seriously. This man is a fucking hero and i thank him for at least showing the WBC that their antagonistic behavior can backfire. He didn't harm them, but he sure as shit drew the line in the sand... and they had passed it years ago.
[editline]9th December 2010[/editline]
I think that is the part where everyone knows that it is what is implied and being an uneducated fuck about your rights is laughable. These guys are uneducated fucks about their rights and so are their supporters/sumpathizers. The legal system is more retarded for not having stitched up the holes that allow retards to cost so many fuckin' money in the long run.[/QUOTE]
How is that implied whatsoever? Show me court cases where the precedent is made that protesting is only valid when it's about "valid things".
:colbert:
Alex, you've read Addicted to Hate, hell you're the one that linked [b]me[/b] to it, you know that the Phelps clan has done way worse than just exercise their right to protest.
[QUOTE=WickedIcon;26597281]:colbert:
Alex, you've read Addicted to Hate, hell you're the one that linked [b]me[/b] to it, you know that the Phelps clan has done way worse than just exercise their right to protest.[/QUOTE]
Yea but that's within their clan, they should be prosecuted for crimes such as that, not for protesting. The people here that want then dead want them dead for protesting.
i bet christians will think twice before fucking around with people that were trained to kill
I think it would be wrong to kill them if they were just protesting soldiers. But at the soldiers funerals? For that they deserve to be fucking shot. I support Newell 100%.
[QUOTE=J-Dude;26542665]Quite frankly Free Speech considered and everything, the only thing that keeps me from wanting to make hate-speech a hate-crime is that we all know some fucking bastard in the future will use it to some horrible end that will eliminate even more rights.
Not that it matters these days. Say "bomb" on an airplane, "fire" in a theater or "I'm going to kill such-and-such"and nobody is going to respect your freedom of speech anyway. So if any exceptions CAN be made, I'd add it to that list. There is NO place in modern society for bigotry in any form. There will NEVER be a time in which hating the Jews, the gays or the blacks is [i]EVER[/i] going to be constructive towards bettering the human race.[/QUOTE]
"bomb" on an airplane is quite different from "You deserve to burn in hell for being a fag"
I'll say it again, these people, IMO, deserve to be removed from society forcefully, but remember the fact that the [B]constitution[/B], I'm quite sure, gives them the right to protest this.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;26584874]This is proof that Psychological terror isn't taken seriously. This man is a fucking hero and i thank him for at least showing the WBC that their antagonistic behavior can backfire.[/QUOTE]
It's not "backfiring." The whole point of the WBC is to provoke people into breaking the law, then collect damages. Fred Phelps is an attorney who probably doesn't give a damn about Jesus.
[QUOTE=TH89;26607629]It's not "backfiring." The whole point of the WBC is to provoke people into breaking the law, then collect damages. Fred Phelps is an attorney who probably doesn't give a damn about Jesus.[/QUOTE]
I have to admit, they are pretty damn smart for making up this scheme.(Maybe not making up, using)
Annoy people until they do something to you, then collect.
Doesn't make what they do any less moronic though.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.