Shooto Brazil Promoting 'First Male vs. Female Fight in MMA History' - Polidicks

Pretty sure women can lose more blood before fainting as well? Good thing it's not a knife fight I suppose.

I don't know about this. Maybe it's good to do once in a while if you truly believe both fighters are completely matched in size and ability, but if we start to combine both groups for more matches I just don't see it being very equal and it could get pretty brutal.

[QUOTE=Tacosheller;43215293]Except most colleges these days have a majority of women and that kind of shows that they're generally a little bit smarter than dudes lol[/QUOTE] This man is completely right Y'see, back in the 50's, those damn blacks were stupid too! That's why everyone hated them!

Women know there self defense and pressure points... she might just mop this guy.

[QUOTE=Buck.;43215540]Women aren't built the same as men. Narrower hips for men allow for better kicks. Men on average have denser bones, bigger lungs and hearts and on athletes 10% faster reaction speed. Men just have more power in general.[/quote] athletes also have their own differences between them - it's not a reason to prevent them from going up against one another if they want to. [quote]It would only be fair if the man and the woman were in different weight classes. I don't think its fair. Look up Fallon Fox, a man to woman transgender mma fighter who went on destroying women in a cage women without telling anyone she is transgender. Even those fights weren't fair and Fallon as been on hormone therapy for a long long time.[/QUOTE] could it be because fallon fox is just a really good fighter?

[QUOTE=HawkeyeTy;43215395]Not really. Professional athletics of literally any variety are pretty much always gender segregated because men and women naturally compete physically at different levels. Its not as childish as lol shesagurl because in physical sports men legitimately tend to be far more capable.[/QUOTE] In my opinion the leagues should be categorized with capability, not gender. There are much larger variances in physical prowess within the genders than between them. Besides, the mythical handicap women have in physical power is only in the upper body and they can close the gap with hard work. And trust me, once they close that gap they're terrifying as fuck. Take this from someone who has witnessed the local MMA club's women.

[QUOTE=mzathemind;43227957]Women know there self defense and pressure points... she might just mop this guy.[/QUOTE] All professional fighters know weak points. The only way she's going to win this fight is if he holds completely back, or she is far more skilled than him.

Individual skill is much more important than biotruths [editline]18th December 2013[/editline] if they're in the same weight class i don't see how it's a big deal.

Hope he's not one of those pansy faggots who goes easy on someone just because they're female

[QUOTE=VenomousBeetle;43228927]Hope he's not one of those pansy faggots who goes easy on someone just because they're female[/QUOTE] If he does, he'll get his balls rocked.

[QUOTE='[Green];43229066']If he does, he'll get his balls rocked.[/QUOTE] Definitely, if he gets in a hold, he's done. She's pretty physically disadvantaged though, if she defends by attempting to match power, she's going to get decimated. I wonder if she's more flexible, and if that will help her. She could beat him fairly easily if she's good at diverting his power.

[QUOTE=katbug;43229094]Definitely, if he gets in a hold, he's done. She's pretty physically disadvantaged though, if she defends by attempting to match power, she's going to get decimated. I wonder if she's more flexible, and if that will help her. She could beat him fairly easily if she's good at diverting his power.[/QUOTE] Hmm, she does seem like a lighter weight but remember that actual power isn't directly correlated with mass. Her opponent might look buff as hell but that doesn't necessarily mean he's that strong. An MMA fighter would probably be though. I'm more interested in how he'll use his height to his advantage.

reminds me of when ronda rousey said she could beat cain velasquez ronda rousey is 5'7 and 137 lbs cain is 6 foot something and 205+ lbs lmao shooto what are you doing

to say cain is is 205+ is an understatement. Dude weighs 249

[QUOTE=HookerVomit;43223940]What are you talking about? Women get kidney stones too[/QUOTE] not out of their cock also this fight was fake/canceled/a publicity stunt

no it wasn't i just saw an add for it on tv.... [editline]21st December 2013[/editline] the problem i see is the woman can make a lot of punches, but the guy is just gonna be able to hit her with a train, unless she is super doped up, she will never be able to be as strong in the arms as the guy

[QUOTE=HybridTheroy;43264075]not out of their cock also this fight was fake/canceled/a publicity stunt[/QUOTE] Yes. I'm aware. Women have vaginas. [quote] GENDER AND AGE Men. Kidney stones are more common in men than women. The risk of kidney stones increases in men in their 40s and continues to rise until age 70. Caucasian men have a higher risk than other groups. Women. The risk of kidney stones peaks in a woman's 50s. In younger women, stones are more likely to develop during the late stages of pregnancy. Pregnant women tend to have a higher calcium intake, but their kidneys do not handle the calcium as well as they did prior to pregnancy. Kidney stones are still rare during pregnancy, however, affecting only 1 in 1,500 pregnancies. Risk Factors in Children. Stones in the urinary tract in children are usually due to genetic factors. Most of the time, the cause is too much calcium in the urine (hypercalciuria). Deformities in the urinary tract pose a significant risk for kidney stones in children. Children with low birth weight who need to be fed intravenously are also at risk for stones. OBESITY AND WEIGHT GAIN Obesity and weight gain are both associated with an increased risk of kidney stones. Higher BMIs and larger waist circumferences are both risk factors for kidney stones. Researchers think that there may be a link between fat tissue, insulin resistance, and urine composition. People with larger body sizes may excrete more calcium and uric acid, which increase the risk of kidney stone formation. FAMILY HISTORY A family history of kidney stones increases one's risk for the condition. Researchers are looking into markers or other factors that might predict kidney stones in relatives, although none has yet been clearly identified. A family history of gout may also make a person vulnerable to stones. ETHNICITY Caucasians seem to have the highest incidence of kidney stones, followed by Mexican Americans. African-Americans have the lowest risk. GEOGRAPHICAL DIFFERENCES Dietary factors, minerals in local water, or both may contribute to geographic differences that have been observed in the occurrence of kidney stones. Studies have reported the highest occurrence of kidney stones in the southern region of the United States and the lowest occurrence in the west. LIFESTYLE FACTORS Specific Foods. In general, certain foods increase the risk for stones only in people who have a genetic or medical vulnerability. People whose diets are high in animal protein and low in fiber and fluids may be at higher risk for stones. A number of foods contain oxalic acid, but there is no proof that such foods make any major contribution to calcium oxalate stones in people who do not have other risk factors. However, several studies have shown that increasing dietary calcium and restricting salt, animal protein, and foods rich in oxalate can help prevent calcium oxalate stones from returning. Stress. One study reported that people who had a major, stressful life experience were more likely to develop stones than those who had not had a stressful experience. Some experts speculate that this increased risk may be due to a hormone called vasopressin, which is released in response to stress. Vasopressin also increases the concentration of urine. Being Bedridden. Any medical or physical condition that keeps a person in bed or immobile increases blood levels of calcium from bone breakdown, thereby posing a risk for stone formation.[/quote]

i hate men you all have beefburgers

She looked upset that the fight didn't happen.

grab her boobies and fling her around the mat tee-hee-hee

[QUOTE=Sableye;43264100]no it wasn't i just saw an add for it on tv....[/QUOTE] Google it. The fight was scheduled for yesterday. [editline]21st December 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=HookerVomit;43264287]Yes. I'm aware. Women have vaginas.[/QUOTE] I don't get why you think my post implies women don't get kidney stone, and why you care so much that you have to post an article on kidney stones. My post implies that kidney stones hurt WAY FUCKING MORE for guys.