Most Americans support Arizona Immigration Bill, further offshore drilling
309 replies, posted
[QUOTE=the_KMM;21927003]Oh, so now I can't use Fox because 'hurrr they're republican tards', and I can't use MSNBC because they like to rile up their viewers.
Just because you don't like certain news doesn't mean it comes from an unreliable source.[/QUOTE]
fox news and msnbc are both retarded and both pick up statistics they like
[QUOTE=Termy58;21963611]fox news and msnbc are both retarded and both pick up statistics they like[/QUOTE]
BBC/Reuters FTW.
Also is CNN even a fucking News Source anymore? All they do is run stories about OMFG LOOK AT THIS TRAGEDY, or LOOK AT THESE PEOPLE HELPING THEIR COMMUNITY, and DIS RACIS, they never seem to show news unless it's too big to be ignored.
Meanwhile, anyone else think Fox as a 24 hour news channel is retarded as even though there's MASSIVE BREAKING NEWS, they refuse to break into their prerecorded political talk shows and Glenn Beck to report on it, seriously do they think no breaking news happens between 7 and 11pm? At least CNN will cut into their shitty reports to report it
[QUOTE=Broseph_;21965369]Also is CNN even a fucking News Source anymore? All they do is run stories about OMFG LOOK AT THIS TRAGEDY, or LOOK AT THESE PEOPLE HELPING THEIR COMMUNITY, and DIS RACIS, they never seem to show news unless it's too big to be ignored.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I've noticed that too, I have to write reports on current events and I used to use CNN but they never have anything remotely interesting anymore.
I like Reuters because of their commitment to neutrality.
[editline]04:08PM[/editline]
[quote=Wikipedia]Reuters has a strict policy towards upholding objectiveness. This policy has caused comment on the possible insensitivity of its non-use of the word terrorist in reports covering major global events, including the September 11 attacks. In the enforcement of this policy, Reuters has been careful to only use the word terrorist in quotes, whether quotations or scare quotes. Reuters global news editor Stephen Jukes wrote, "We all know that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, and that Reuters upholds the principle that we do not use the word terrorist." The Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz responded, "After the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and again after the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Reuters allowed the events to be described as acts of terror. But as of last week, even that terminology is banned." The Washington Post Reuters later apologised for this characterisation of their policy,[15] although they maintained the policy itself.
The 20 September 2004 edition of the The New York Times reported that the Reuters Global Managing Editor, David A. Schlesinger, objected to Canadian newspapers' editing of Reuters articles by inserting the word terrorist, stating that "my goal is to protect our reporters and protect our editorial integrity." [16]
[/quote]
[QUOTE=Mexican;21961568][IMG]http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Entertainment/images-6/glenn-beck.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Oh hey I watch him every week day.
That's cool.
[QUOTE=the_KMM;21967718]Oh hey I watch him every week day.[/QUOTE]
Explains a lot.
[QUOTE=the_KMM;21967718]Oh hey I watch him every week day.[/QUOTE]
Hello Glaber, this would explain why you know nothing.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;21968393]Hello Glaber, this would explain why you know nothing.[/QUOTE]
I'm not Glaber, if that's what you're saying. Look at the join date.
[QUOTE=the_KMM;21968405]I'm not Glaber, if that's what you're saying. Look at the join date.[/QUOTE]
He's saying that both you and Glaber are GB fanbois.
[QUOTE=PrismatexV8;21968419]He's saying that both you and Glaber are GB fanbois.[/QUOTE]
Oh.
Mmmk. I admit to that part.
[QUOTE=the_KMM;21967718]Oh hey I watch him every week day.[/QUOTE]
i watch your mom undress every week day
[QUOTE=thisispain;21968482]i watch your mom undress every week day[/QUOTE]
Completely relevant to the thread.
[QUOTE=the_KMM;21967718]Oh hey I watch him every week day.[/QUOTE]
I can see where you get your views from.
[QUOTE=the_KMM;21967718]Oh hey I watch him every week day.[/QUOTE]
So you're aware that his entire show is the definition of Godwin's Law
[QUOTE=the_KMM;21967718]Oh hey I watch him every week day.[/QUOTE]
Didn't you know Glenn Beck has Nazi tourette?
[QUOTE=the_KMM;21951288]Everything you said here is correct.
How did I get Yamwen on my side here?
[/QUOTE]
I'm not on your side. Your against illegal immigration because you believe illegals should come in legally instead. I am against illegal immigration because it exploits these illegals and I believe they should be given amnesty and the requirements to be a legal citizen should be lowered way down.
Saying "they should just immigrate legally" shows a misunderstanding of the situation. it's extremely hard to legally immigrate from mexico to the u.s., and it takes years
[QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;21969666]Saying "they should just immigrate legally" shows a misunderstanding of the situation. it's extremely hard to legally immigrate from mexico to the u.s., and it takes years[/QUOTE]
Where's that chart that demonstrates it could take on average anywhere from 6 to 20 years to be naturalized when you need it?
[QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;21969666]Saying "they should just immigrate legally" shows a misunderstanding of the situation. it's extremely hard to legally immigrate from mexico to the u.s., and it takes years[/QUOTE]
It's not that it just takes years, it's that precious few people are actually capable of making it.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;21970274]It's not that it just takes years, it's that precious few people are actually capable of making it.[/QUOTE]
Yea, only a couple thousand green cards go out each year, and it can cost hundreds and thousands of dollars to even get in the line.
The pilgrims were illegals too :patriot:
[QUOTE=Perfumly;21970956]The pilgrims were illegals too :patriot:[/QUOTE]
but they were white so it's not an issue :patriot:
[QUOTE=Billiam;21970233]Where's that chart that demonstrates it could take on average anywhere from 6 to 20 years to be naturalized when you need it?[/QUOTE]
[img_thumb]http://reason.com/assets/db/07cf533ddb1d06350cf1ddb5942ef5ad.jpg[/img_thumb]
[QUOTE=Perfumly;21970956]The pilgrims were illegals too :patriot:[/QUOTE]
Technically not, since they didn't immigrate to an area that had any immigration laws.
[QUOTE=yawmwen;21972868]Technically not, since they didn't immigrate to an area that had any immigration laws.[/QUOTE]
I think it qualifies when there was basically only one indian tribe in northeast america that were even remotely ok with them being there
[QUOTE=yawmwen;21972868]Technically not, since they didn't immigrate to an area that had any immigration laws.[/QUOTE]
Morality does not exist without bureaucracy?
[QUOTE=Lambeth;21972494][img_thumb]http://reason.com/assets/db/07cf533ddb1d06350cf1ddb5942ef5ad.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
Could someone show a cart showing the process in South Korea, France, and the United Kingdom?
I really doubt the United States are the only county which require years to become a Citizen.
[QUOTE=Perfumly;21973943]I think it qualifies when there was basically only one indian tribe in northeast america that were even remotely ok with them being there[/QUOTE]
ya but we didnt steal there jobs
[QUOTE=yawmwen;21974408]ya but we didnt steal there jobs[/QUOTE]
Illegal immigrants don't steal jobs.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.