• Obama is releasing a childrens book.
    178 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Warhol;24877852]Ghostwriting refers to political books of thee I sing is a book for 10 year olds. So it's either on level of Going Rogue or a childrens book. With those illustrations, I'm p. sure it's a childrens book. [editline]01:52PM[/editline] When you're skipping on the argument and flinging around ad homs for such a stupid point, yeah, you make yourself seem like a troll.[/QUOTE]urgh more palin bashing good way to defend your libtard moral high ground not even worth having a rational discussion with you. your defense mechanisms are showing.
[QUOTE=Robbobin;24877866]is this a joke. I can't help but think facepunch doesn't understand how the world works whatsoever.[/QUOTE] Idiot above me thinks Sarah Palin wrote a 400 page auto-biography on her political experiences, including her loss and opinions... Released shortly after her long bid for president. BUT, Obama didn't write a 20 page picture book for his children far before his presidency. [editline]01:57PM[/editline] [QUOTE=pognivet;24877872]urgh more palin bashing good way to defend your libtard moral high ground[/QUOTE] I don't like a lady who wanted to bring another Brigg's initiative about. Second sentence didn't make sense. Again, what the fuck is a libtard? [editline]01:57PM[/editline] you're obviously trolling. That or just really fucking stupid.
[QUOTE=pognivet;24877843]the illusion of argument on facepunch: dig yourself so deep into a logical fallacy that it's impossible to back out of without being embarrassed and call anyone who disagrees with you a troll[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Warhol;24877884]you're obviously trolling. That or just really fucking stupid.[/QUOTE]you literally cannot go through a sentence without saying fuck. you're getting mad for absolutely no reason. can you just calm down, look through the evidence and then try to present counter-evidence like a normal human being instead of just FUCK FUCK PALIN TROLL FUCK YOUR RONG.
[QUOTE=pognivet;24877939]you literally cannot go through a sentence without saying fuck. you're getting mad for absolutely no reason. can you just calm down, look through the evidence and then try to present counter-evidence like a normal human being instead of just FUCK FUCK PALIN TROLL FUCK YOUR RONG.[/QUOTE] palin is a joke and you're a joke shut up
[QUOTE=pognivet;24877939]you literally cannot go through a sentence without saying fuck. you're getting mad for absolutely no reason. can you just calm down, look through the evidence and then try to present counter-evidence like a normal human being instead of just FUCK FUCK PALIN TROLL FUCK YOUR RONG.[/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure Rong stays in the TF section. Anyway, you are worse than 9/11 theorists, atleast they source something, even if it's crap
[QUOTE=pognivet;24877939]you literally cannot go through a sentence without saying fuck. you're getting mad for absolutely no reason. can you just calm down, look through the evidence and then try to present counter-evidence like a normal human being instead of just FUCK FUCK PALIN TROLL FUCK YOUR RONG.[/QUOTE] Just ignore the points. Provide the evidence first. What fucking part of this do you not understand. I've said it 8 fucking times now.
[QUOTE=Warhol;24878017]Just ignore the points. Provide the evidence first. What fucking part of this do you not understand. I've said it 8 fucking times now.[/QUOTE] since you're too incompetent to even use a search engine most first graders manipulate with ease: [url]http://articles.latimes.com/2010/may/23/opinion/la-oe-fehrman-ghost-20100523[/url] [editline]06:15AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Warhol;24878017] What fucking part of this do you not understand. I've said it 8 fucking times now.[/QUOTE]also lol @ getting upset for absolutely no reason other than you've been defeated with a logical argument. true sign of immaturity.
It's not my fucking job to prove YOUR argument. " This might seem like a story designed to rally supporters of serious writing and thinking: A political figure who actually crafts her own words, who stands up to lazy editors and stands on her convictions. But what would those supporters make of Roosevelt's various assistants? To complete "This I Remember," she relied on them not only to edit and offer advice but to dig through her files for anecdotes and stories, to compile questions to spur her memory — even to organize and outline her responses." THIS IS A BOOK FOR CHILDREN not a political manuscript. The article's point is that "ghost writing isn't that bad" and "Eleanor Roosevelt did it, but she still technically wrote it" And Sarah Palin DIDN'T have a ghost writer?
[QUOTE=Warhol;24878113]It's not my fucking job to prove YOUR argument. " This might seem like a story designed to rally supporters of serious writing and thinking: A political figure who actually crafts her own words, who stands up to lazy editors and stands on her convictions. But what would those supporters make of Roosevelt's various assistants? To complete "This I Remember," she relied on them not only to edit and offer advice but to dig through her files for anecdotes and stories, to compile questions to spur her memory — even to organize and outline her responses." THIS IS A BOOK FOR CHILDREN not a political manuscript. The article's point is that "ghost writing isn't that bad" and "Eleanor Roosevelt did it, but she still technically wrote it" And Sarah Palin DIDN'T have a ghost writer?[/QUOTE]First of all, you completely misinterpreted the article (which you probably didn't even read in the first place). Second of all, the genre is inconsequential. [quote]It's not my fucking job to prove YOUR argument.[/quote] Getting mad for no reason for the sixth time. I don't expect you to provide my argument for me. You can't even provide your own lol. I've already provided my argument in a clear, concise manner which you have danced around and avoided like it's a job application or a book besides V for Vendetta.
Oh yay Obama wrote a book. Good to know hes really working on fixing our country :saddowns:
[QUOTE=pognivet;24878143]First of all, you completely misinterpreted the article (which you probably didn't even read in the first place).[/quote] You again, skipped the point. " The point is, even politicians who write their own books don't write them alone, and we'd be better off looking past ghostwriting to the real problems behind political books." [quote]Second of all, the genre is inconsequential.[/quote] First of all, you used this article as a citation that obama didn't write his book. If that's your citation, then the genre is important. [quote]Getting mad for no reason for the sixth time.[/quote] I didn't realise cursing means your mad. [quote]I don't expect you to provide my argument for me. You can't even provide your own lol.[/quote] Are you fucking illiterate? [quote]I've already provided my argument in a clear, concise manner which you have danced around and avoided like it's a job application or a book besides V for Vendetta.[/QUOTE] You made your point clear, yet you have posted ONE meager source or even fucking description of your point this entire thread. Christ almighty, the fuck is wrong with you? How the FUCK do you sit there being arrogant and spending more time describing why you think you're right AND REFUSE to prove your argument. [editline]02:37PM[/editline] [QUOTE=c0nk3r;24878203]Oh yay Obama wrote a book. Good to know hes really working on fixing our country :saddowns:[/QUOTE] a book he wrote before he was president.
V This is the point at which you become mad again and go off on a rant V[QUOTE=Warhol;24878286] Are you [highlight]fucking[/highlight] illiterate? You made your point clear, yet you have posted ONE meager source or even [highlight]fucking[/highlight] description of your point this entire thread. Christ almighty, the [highlight]fuck[/highlight] is wrong with you? How the [highlight]FUCK[/highlight] do you sit there being arrogant and spending more time describing why you think you're right AND REFUSE to prove your argument.[/QUOTE] Once again you succeed in completely dodging the point by just flaming me. I've given you the evidence you've asked for, have you refuted it with counter-evidence? No. You just furiously type with your yellowed fingernails while your greasy face turns red from anxiety. By genre I mean it doesn't matter if it's a children's book or an autobiography. It is completely irrelevant. also [quote]I didn't realise cursing means your mad.[/quote] >your
wow, cursing means you're angry apparently Jesus, thank god you never met Lankist. and AGAIN, your citation is talking about political books. of thee I sing is a childrens book
[QUOTE=Warhol;24878376]and AGAIN, your citation is talking about political books. of thee I sing is a childrens book[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=pognivet;24878349] By genre I mean it doesn't matter if it's a children's book or an autobiography. It is completely irrelevant. [/QUOTE]restating stupid opinions that have been shewn to be garbage is not proper arguing also cursing is either a sign of anger or inarticulateness. so you're either one or the other. perhaps both.
Isnt warhol the faggot that trolled the shit out of the second amendment right's thread?
I think that was JDK
[QUOTE=pognivet;24878417]restating stupid opinions that have been shewn to be garbage is not proper arguing also cursing is either a sign of anger or inarticulateness. so you're either one or the other. perhaps both.[/QUOTE] Prove Obama didn't write the book. Prove Sarah Palin in contrast DID write her book. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_osQvkeNRM[/media] So Stephen Fry is either angry or inarticulate? lol
[QUOTE=Warhol;24878877]Prove Obama didn't write the book. Prove Sarah Palin in contrast DID write her book. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_osQvkeNRM[/media] So Stephen Fry is either angry or inarticulate? lol[/QUOTE]that's a comedic act. this is an argument. unless if your argument [I]is[/I] a comedic act. (it seems to be) also prove Obama did write his novel and Sarah Palin did not write hers since you're so adamant about these supposed "facts".
Stephen Fry is also a political commentator and Journalist. I have read many of his books, all of them swear. So basically you refuse to provide an argument? lol You're blatantly trolling. [editline]03:38PM[/editline] It's just plain logic, you don't pay large amounts of money for a political ghost writer to write a book for an 8 year old. [editline]03:39PM[/editline] The Audacity of hope? He most likely had ghost writers. of thee I sing? obviously not.
[QUOTE=Warhol;24879017]You're blatantly trolling.[/quote] again with that? :rolleyes: [QUOTE=Warhol;24879017] [editline]03:38PM[/editline] It's just plain logic, you don't pay large amounts of money for a political ghost writer to write a book for an 8 year old.[/QUOTE]who says he pays "large amounts of money"? i can guarantee you that whatever he paid them was hardly a pebble out of his Earth-sized budget
"Idiot above me thinks Sarah Palin wrote a 400 page auto-biography on her political experiences, including her loss and opinions... Released shortly after her long bid for president. BUT, Obama didn't write a 20 page picture book for his children far before his presidency." you keep ignoring this. Explain your logic, boyo. ghost writers are not fucking cheap.
[QUOTE=Warhol;24879126]"Idiot above me thinks Sarah Palin wrote a 400 page auto-biography on her political experiences, including her loss and opinions... Released shortly after her long bid for president. BUT, Obama didn't write a 20 page picture book for his children far before his presidency." you keep ignoring this. Explain your logic, boyo. ghost writers are not fucking cheap.[/QUOTE]how am i ignoring it? i addressed it completely and fully. lol @ inarticulate turbonerd anger again also, they are quite cheap when you have millions of dollars at your disposal and when you're making millions more off of the book itself.
[QUOTE=pognivet;24879156]how am i ignoring it? i addressed it completely and fully. lol @ inarticulate turbonerd anger again also, they are quite cheap when you have millions of dollars at your disposal and when you're making millions more off of the book itself.[/QUOTE] I looked through everyone of your arguments, only thing I see is you crying and saying "WAHHHH, U PROVE IT FIRST Q_Q" you haven't answered why I'm homophobic (I Guess i'm one of those self hating cock-suckers). What a libtard is. How Sarah Palin pulled that AMAZING feat by herself, but Obama can't handle a childrens book. Or provided any more then one poor citation, which I refuted and you ignored. lol @ you pretending to be articulate. He hasn't released the book yet. [editline]03:53PM[/editline] You are literally a child, it's pathetic. [editline]03:53PM[/editline] pognivet's original point: Obama did not write this book. [QUOTE=pognivet;24855047]he probably didn't actually write it himself[/QUOTE] Not a response, before I posted anything claiming he wrote it. Made his original point. [QUOTE=pognivet;24873563]are you so naïve that you actually believe politicians write their own books? they either submit a short outline that gets edited and fluffed up by an editor or somebody else just writes the entire thing for them.[/QUOTE] Provides no evidence, restates his original argument makes claim without backing it up. Ignores the fact no one above the age of 10 will read it. [QUOTE=pognivet;24874661]why are you so mad? all i did was point out your blatantly foolish belief.[/QUOTE] Provides ZERO argument. [QUOTE=pognivet;24875354]why don't you prove that he [I]did[/I] write it[/QUOTE] Provides no argument, ignores burden of proof. "Burden of proof is the obligation of a party on one side of a dispute or issue to provide sufficient evidence in support of their position. There are two common but quite distinct applications of burden of proof." [QUOTE=pognivet;24875896]you both claimed he did write it. now back it up.[/QUOTE] creepy crossdressing conservative weeaboo seems to forget he made the original point. Burden of proof is still on him. Still refuses to prove an argument. [QUOTE=pognivet;24877435]you both claimed and vehemently believed that he wrote the book before i ever said that he didn't write the book. now back-back-back it up. also lol @ homophobic comment from self-advertised libtard[/QUOTE] No argument provided. know what, point made, you're a terrible poster.
[QUOTE=Warhol;24879239]I looked through everyone of your arguments, only thing I see is you crying and saying "WAHHHH, U PROVE IT FIRST Q_Q" you haven't answered why I'm homophobic (I Guess i'm one of those self hating cock-suckers). What a libtard is. How Sarah Palin pulled that AMAZING feat by herself, but Obama can't handle a childrens book. Or provided any more then one poor citation, which I refuted and you ignored. lol @ you pretending to be articulate. He hasn't released the book yet. [editline]03:53PM[/editline] You are literally a child, it's pathetic. [editline]03:53PM[/editline] pognivet's original point: Obama did not write this book. Not a response, before I posted anything claiming he wrote it. Made his original point. Provides no evidence, restates his original argument makes claim without backing it up. Ignores the fact no one above the age of 10 will read it. Provides ZERO argument. Provides no argument, ignores burden of proof. "Burden of proof is the obligation of a party on one side of a dispute or issue to provide sufficient evidence in support of their position. There are two common but quite distinct applications of burden of proof." creepy crossdressing conservative weeaboo seems to forget he made the original point. Burden of proof is still on him. Still refuses to prove an argument. No argument provided. know what, point made, you're a terrible poster.[/QUOTE]you should get an agent and publish that post. you mad. end of story.
you're a troll, end of story. [editline]03:58PM[/editline] I have never seen a person, who is acting like they want to debate, refuse so fucking much to provide their argument. You are an obvious troll.
[QUOTE=Warhol;24879316]you're a troll, end of story. [editline]03:58PM[/editline] I have never seen a person, who is acting like they want to debate, refuse so fucking much to provide their argument. You are an obvious troll.[/QUOTE]nop u describin yoself b-boi
He haven't done jack shit. Broken promises.
[QUOTE=Chekko;24880446]He haven't done jack shit. Broken promises.[/QUOTE] like what?
[QUOTE=M477;24829072]So this is what he does instead of running my country?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=NotSo1337;24830577]:downsbravo: While the country is slowly falling apart, he's sitting around writing a book. [sp]He should've become a story writer rather than the President.[/sp][/QUOTE] [img]http://imgkk.com/i/pvoz.png[/img] [url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11311000[/url]
"US President [B]Barack Obama has written [/B]a children's book which is to be published on 16 November, two weeks after Congressional mid-term elections." "US President Barack Obama has written" Hey Weeaboo asshole, that evidence enough?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.