British Judges Free Child Rapists, Say 12-Year-Old Girls “Wanted” Sex - Polidicks

[QUOTE=TropicalV2;31303030]you're a giant ignoramus the behavioral study states that kids are growing up faster, girls are more likely to wear scantily clad clothing and makeup which makes them look what: older because when you grow up faster you become what faster: older put one and one together to make two the other two things we posted show that physical development in females has been speeding up significantly in the last few decades[/QUOTE] "The 12- to 14-year-olds of yesterday are the 10- to 12-'s of today," acting like 12-14 is a long way from 16+

[QUOTE=TropicalV2;31303045]nothing justified about having sex with girls in a park. should have at least rented a motel room.[/QUOTE] yeah they should have at least rented a motel room when they fucked little kids sheesh! (hilarious joke btw!!! hahaha!)

Sounds like my kinda judge. :quagmire:

I dont know if it's the fact that you people dont go out much or maybe it's just that you're stuck in the 90's because teenage girls could easily appear to be way above their age, perhaps even 18 in rare cases if they use makeup properly. Using Bras with special padding also helps.

[QUOTE=Sie-Sveinhund;31303086]Sounds like my kinda judge. :quagmire:[/QUOTE] haha rape is funny lol family guy XD

also that's a study of 2nd graders that doesn't demonstrate to me that there are 12 year olds that looks like they are able to have consensual sex

[QUOTE=Lazor;31303069]"The 12- to 14-year-olds of yesterday are the 10- to 12-'s of today," acting like 12-14 is a long way from 16+[/QUOTE] OK first you're banging on about physical maturity, now you're trying to play emotional maturity? Two totally different things. P.S regarding "human development" : [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puberty#Historical_shift[/url] Read the historical shift section and the studies referenced there in.

am i the only one who doesn't really care if the 12 years olds looked 16 or not?

[QUOTE=thisispain;31303099]am i the only one who doesn't really care if the 12 years olds looked 16 or not?[/QUOTE] yeah I have no idea why that's even the topic of discussion now, I guess it makes it easier to justify the gang-rape of 12 year-olds

it's called countering his argument that the 12 year olds of today are behaving like 16 year olds even the study he cited say they aren't

[QUOTE=Lazor;31303092]also that's a study of 2nd graders that doesn't demonstrate to me that there are 12 year olds that looks like they are able to have consensual sex[/QUOTE] if you know anything about growing up you know that kids grow even more from then 30% of children are starting puberty at age 7 man

[QUOTE=Lachz0r;31302355]wait wait wait, they admit to raping 2 girls that they thought were 16 then turn out to be 12, i don't understand this story at all what the fuck is this judge thinking?[/QUOTE] It stopped being consensual sex when they found out they were really 12 years old.

[QUOTE=thisispain;31303099]am i the only one who doesn't really care if the 12 years olds looked 16 or not?[/QUOTE] i don't really either but someone made it a thing

[QUOTE=Sanius;31303108]yeah I have no idea why that's even the topic of discussion now, I guess it makes it easier to justify the gang-rape of 12 year-olds[/QUOTE] You're saying beyond a measure of a doubt that it was in fact, rape?

Lot of dumb people in here, right Sanius? :rolleye:

[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;31303134]You're saying beyond a measure of a doubt that it was in fact, rape?[/QUOTE] um, yes they are 12 years old which is 4 years under the age of consent, that is statutory rape no matter how you look at it

[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;31303134]You're saying beyond a measure of a doubt that it was in fact, rape?[/QUOTE] yes

:siren:They didn't fucking rape the girls, they wanted it, the only reason the article says rape is they're too young to consent to sex, very misleading:siren: Also gang rape? I call it group sex.

[QUOTE=Lazor;31303141]um, yes they are 12 years old which is 4 years under the age of consent, that is statutory rape no matter how you look at it[/QUOTE] how dense are you the guys had no idea they were 12 until after the fact that sorta makes it a hell of a lot different

[QUOTE=Zet;31303123]It stopped being consensual sex when they found out they were really 12 years old.[/QUOTE] Which, according the article this editorial is referencing, they only found out when the appeal for any information was put out. I'm also not sure why people keep saying they are innocent, they aren't, they still have a criminal conviction.

[QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;31303150]:siren:They didn't fucking rape the girls, they wanted it, the only reason the article says rape is they're too young to consent to sex, very misleading:siren:[/QUOTE] no actually it's not misleading you twat since it still legally considered [b]rape[/b], and for good reason

[QUOTE=Lazor;31303141]um, yes they are 12 years old which is 4 years under the age of consent, that is statutory rape no matter how you look at it[/QUOTE] Yeah statutory rape is a far cry from actual rape. Misleading context at best.

[QUOTE=Mon;31303151]how dense are you the guys had no idea they were 12 until after the fact that sorta makes it a hell of a lot different[/QUOTE] lol no it doesn't even this retard of a judge didin't repeal their conviction

[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;31303134]You're saying beyond a measure of a doubt that it was in fact, rape?[/QUOTE] read the article bro they confessed to rape

[QUOTE=Lazor;31303155]no actually it's not misleading you twat since it still legally considered [b]rape[/b], and for good reason[/QUOTE] Yeah, it is considered rape but also take into consideration that the girls posed at 16 year old girls and therefore it wasn't the guy's fault, they thought it was just some easy pussy and they took the opportunity.

[QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;31303150]:siren:They didn't fucking rape the girls, they wanted it, the only reason the article says rape is they're too young to consent to sex, very misleading:siren: [/QUOTE] your avatar is very fitting. it's like you truly are stuck in the 18th century

[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;31303158]Yeah statutory rape is a far cry from actual rape. Misleading context at best.[/QUOTE] "actual rape" lol ok please define "actual rape" for me

[QUOTE=Lazor;31303166]"actual rape" lol ok please define "actual rape" for me[/QUOTE] Unconsensual sex, this was consensual.

[QUOTE=Lazor;31303159]lol no it doesn't even this retard of a judge didin't repeal their conviction[/QUOTE] let's look at a case of a guy getting killed then let's say that you're going up an elevator, and somehow, through normal operation, you manage to kill a man 3 floors up. would you convict him of murder? because that's sort of what you're getting at here

[QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;31303174]Consensual sex, this was consensual.[/QUOTE] um, no hello, age of consent?