Irish election candidate wants gay people jailed, adultery made illegal and rock bands outlawed - Polidicks

-snip-

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617694]Cheating often results in divorce. Current divorce laws split assets in a way that does not take cause of divorce into consideration. I think if you cheat on your partner, it should be taken into account during divorce and less assets be directed to the cheater. Otherwise you're just rewarding their behavior while fucking over the other person.[/QUOTE] Thatd make things so needlessly complicated. What if both people cheat? Do you give more money to the one who cheated less often? With less people? And what about all the cheating claims, are you going to use up government money to investigate every single case to see whether or not it really happened?

Here is her election manifesto [IMG]https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/susan-anne-white.jpg[/IMG]

Never, in the history of anything, has the Jonah Jameson laugh clip been more appropriate. This has to be parody. [quote]Mrs White said she opposes feminism "with all her might", and says it is to blame for the recession.[/quote] [quote]Mrs White claims she is a "true friend" to the gay community. "I tell them the truth," she added. "The person who is not a friend, the person who is the enemy to the homosexual is the person who pats them on the back and says their lifestyle is perfectly normal and acceptable."[/quote] Seriously, this HAS to be a joke to see how far she can go!

I agree with her, feminism has destroyed our society and needs to be reversed. We should start by taking away women's right to vote and hold public office.

[QUOTE=Ripmax;47619999]Here is her election manifesto [IMG]https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/susan-anne-white.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] reads like satire in fact i think if it was actually satire itd be less extreme than the real thing

[QUOTE=Ripmax;47619999]Here is her election manifesto [IMG]https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/susan-anne-white.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] "Imprison [...] those involved in dog fights" One of these things is not like the other.

[QUOTE=Ripmax;47619999]Here is her election manifesto [IMG]https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/susan-anne-white.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] withdraw from europe? is she going to hook ireland up to some tugboats and drag it to the middle of the atlantic? [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Butthurter;47620050]i thought you meant isis elections shed make a good contender really, all shed have to do is declare herself a certain religion without any knowledge whatsoever of her new profound belief and shed fit right in[/QUOTE] she might meet some resistance with her "ban halal slaughter" and "end islamisation" platforms but its nothing some good PR can't take care of

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47619267]Not talking about the woman specifically, just the idea of adultery-like laws being added as companion marriage laws.[/QUOTE] That would outlaw all sex with someone who isn't your spouse. What if a couple wants an open marriage? What if they want to have a threesome? What if they're swingers? What if one person wants out of the marriage but is stuck because the other person is holding up divorce proceedings? What if one person wants out of the marriage but hasn't worked up the confidence to file for divorce? What if a married person falls in love with someone else and plans on leaving for them? Hell, what if two people are planning on splitting up, but they can't right now for whatever reason, but they're fine with the other dating as the marriage is effectively over to both of them? People are hurt by adultery, and that sucks, but people can also be hurt by marriage. Making adultery illegal isn't a solution to anything.

[QUOTE=Ninja Gnome;47620082]withdraw from europe? is she going to hook ireland up to some tugboats and drag it to the middle of the atlantic?[/QUOTE] I don't know about you but that sounds like an AWESOME idea.

[QUOTE=BlueChihuahua;47620056]"Imprison [...] those involved in dog fights" One of these things is not like the other.[/QUOTE] Think of all of those poor pilots that will be sent to prison

Huh, who knew that Red Green was an Irish Christian fundamentalist? Keep your stick on the ice

[QUOTE=Mudkipslol;47618091]We must never discover a fountain of youth, otherwise crazy old people like her will be around forever. Imagine that shit.[/QUOTE] Imagine when the views you think you're so progressive and self-righteous about holding today are considered archaic and shameful by your children and grandchildren. You'll be laughing on the other side of your face. [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Ninja Gnome;47618148]i don't get how people can think society isn't supposed to change as time goes on. i mean, if she really wants to stick to her guns she should go hunt and gather and sleep on the ground outside[/QUOTE] Seriously I should start a website. [url]www.eatyourwords.com[/url]

[QUOTE=Penultimate;47617962]But charges would be brought. There's a whole ton of cops. Not all of them would be tolerant.[/QUOTE] Pretty sure the crime of "cheating" would require that it was not okay with your partner [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Janus Vesta;47620095]That would outlaw all sex with someone who isn't your spouse. What if a couple wants an open marriage? What if they want to have a threesome? What if they're swingers? What if one person wants out of the marriage but is stuck because the other person is holding up divorce proceedings? What if one person wants out of the marriage but hasn't worked up the confidence to file for divorce? What if a married person falls in love with someone else and plans on leaving for them? Hell, what if two people are planning on splitting up, but they can't right now for whatever reason, but they're fine with the other dating as the marriage is effectively over to both of them? People are hurt by adultery, and that sucks, but people can also be hurt by marriage. Making adultery illegal isn't a solution to anything.[/QUOTE] You could easily make a law that allows people do those things if they want to. The problem is cheating, not biblical adultery. Cheating is breaking the lawful contract of marriage by having sex with someone other than your spouse without their approval

[quote]Mrs White said she opposes feminism "with all her might", and says it is to blame for the recession.[/quote] Why don't you follow the traditional pre-feminist rules then, and stay at home and not be a politician? [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Ripmax;47619999]Here is her election manifesto [IMG]https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/susan-anne-white.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Funny how she doesn't oppose kosher slaughter...

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47619057]Are you saying in the west it's okay to cheat and we should encourage such behavior?[/QUOTE] No, i believe Adultery is wrong, but jesus, you don't need to go to jail for it. There is more other criminals that deserve to go to jail instead of some guy or some girl who wants to love somebody else.

[QUOTE=Deathtrooper2;47620589]No, i believe Adultery is wrong, but jesus, you don't need to go to jail for it. There is more other criminals that deserve to go to jail instead of some guy or some girl who wants to love somebody else.[/QUOTE] Why does everyone's reading comprehension suck so much dick today He didn't say you should go to jail, he said that they should get no benefits from the divorce if they cheated. 50/50 off the fucking table

[QUOTE=Ninja Gnome;47620082]withdraw from europe? is she going to hook ireland up to some tugboats and drag it to the middle of the atlantic?[/QUOTE] northern ireland is kind of in the UK

[QUOTE=SomeRandomGuy18;47620357]Pretty sure the crime of "cheating" would require that it was not okay with your partner [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] You could easily make a law that allows people do those things if they want to. The problem is cheating, not biblical adultery. Cheating is breaking the lawful contract of marriage by having sex with someone other than your spouse without their approval[/QUOTE] I meant the crime of adultery. Which would include swingers and open marriages and stuff like that. [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Penultimate;47620798]I meant the crime of adultery. Which would include swingers and open marriages and stuff like that.[/QUOTE] And the lady only said "adultery."

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617588]Why not? If you enter a lawful monogamous marriage then I don't see why cheating on someone you marry shouldn't have consequences with the law.[/QUOTE] Calm down Henry VIII, you can't chop off the head of every woman you accuse of adultery.

In any marriage with me the toilet seat will remain DOWN and if you can't make that work then it's off to the clink with you. Regardless of how much of a violation of trust it is, cheating is a personal matter that the government has no place interjecting itself.

If she wants women to stay at home, the why can't she give and example and stay at home herself?

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617588]Why not? If you enter a lawful monogamous marriage then I don't see why cheating on someone you marry shouldn't have consequences with the law.[/QUOTE] So write together a contract on getting a fine if you are in breach of your monogamy. Or you know, do what most people do - get a divorce or try to talk it out.

Did someone forget to lock the doors at the retirement home again?

She's right about one thing - its less that she is extreme, its more that society has moved on from such practices. Its interesting to see how far we've come in a relatively short time, compared to the Dark Ages where nothing like this happened at all.

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617910]I believe marriage overall should not be a thing legally but it is and we have to deal with that. [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] If no charges are pressed then there is no issue though.[/QUOTE] I think your very nieve about marriage if you think it shouldn't exist, all cultures have had some sort of ceremony where two persons in love with each other pledge themselves to each other. That is the religious side, the secular side is if two people want to live together and have a life together they need certain legal protections that allow them to share benefits, insurance, protection in court, and the ability to have joint custody of children, which is what the issue is with gay marriage, civil unions were not offering these protections and people are living and dying without these protections which is making an undue burden on their lives imposed by the state [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=FlandersNed;47621516]She's right about one thing - its less that she is extreme, its more that society has moved on from such practices. Its interesting to see how far we've come in a relatively short time, compared to the Dark Ages where nothing like this happened at all.[/QUOTE] Actually in mideval times nobody gave a shit, there's plenty of documented cases where two women or two men lived together for decades and even cases where villages recognized transgendered individuals as their chosen identity, additionally as far back as the 1500s there's records of priests marrying gay couples because priests had to marry anyone who petitioned them so long as one was dressed like a man and the other a woman and often these occurred in the middle of a dark night so who's going to bother checking, it only became a problem in the last 150-200 years or so

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617615]But divorce due to adultery still results in asset split. I think if you cheat you should not get 50% cut after a divorce.[/QUOTE] You obviously never seen or been involved in a divorce. The motion is hell enough.

[QUOTE=lazyguy;47620313]Imagine when the views you think you're so progressive and self-righteous about holding today are considered archaic and shameful by your children and grandchildren. You'll be laughing on the other side of your face. [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] Seriously I should start a website. [url]www.eatyourwords.com[/url][/QUOTE] my statement will have as much truth then as it does now. if i hold even a shred of the same beliefs then as i do now, i'm not going to be kicking and screaming about how "everything should go back to how it was". i may lament the "good old days" but i'm not going to stand in the way of whatever progress may be happening. [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] "the old ways is the best ways" is no longer viable, information and ideas propogte far too quickly for that.

By basically every metric the "good ol days" were less good than today

i cant wait for this generation to die out