Teen Accused of Stabbing Her Best Friend 65 times Over Naked Selfies
72 replies, posted
how would your post have accomplished that by asking for cp and how should anyone be able to interpret that from your post
[QUOTE=DOG-GY;44423073]how would your post have accomplished that by asking for cp and how should anyone be able to interpret that from your post[/QUOTE]
It's pretty easy to get the connection
[QUOTE=WitheredGryphon;44422980]There's a difference between joking and shitposting asking for child porn.[/QUOTE]
if you really think people were seriously asking for the underage nudes of a now-convicted murderer you're probably a moron
[QUOTE=WitheredGryphon;44422918]God, have some self respect. Someone was brutally murdered and you have the audacity to ask for links to their nude pictures, alongside it also being child pornography?[/QUOTE]
If you're expecting dignity from anyone that uses the internet, you should think twice, it's sad but true. It's obvious that he wasn't legitimately asking for photos too.
Thread title is "Teen Accused of Stabbing Her Best Friend 65 times Over [highlight]Naked Selfies[/highlight]"
person reads title, goes into to thread to ask for links to pics, has to scroll down to post said comment.
person briefly goes over replies, sees comment about cp, person realizes they're underage.
person doesn't post comment.
It all made sense it my head.
shred calm down
Ban Facebook, it's the only solution.
Why would you take that picture in the first place? And not delete it afterwards?
[QUOTE=Shreddinger;44422175]Link to cp?
[highlight]User was banned for this post ("Insensitive Shitposting" - postal))[/highlight]
[highlight]User was banned for this post ("Predicting Moderation" - Craptasket))[/highlight][/QUOTE]
i say this every week but
this is like, the grossest post on this entire forum regardless of whether it's a joke or not
[editline]1st April 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Shreddinger;44423020]The point of my post was to hopefully stop those kind of responses, for people that didn't actually read the article and realize that they're underage, but to no effect.[/QUOTE]
thanks for doing the good lord's work!!!
[QUOTE=Squerl101;44422209]Wow, is it really worth stabbing someone 65 times just because they posted naked pictures of you on Facebook?
People are monsters.[/QUOTE]
they are idiots, not monsters. You really think she was in a sound state of mind? This is one of the extremely rare cases where a crime of passion defense could actually work.
who got stabbed? the one on the left?
Why would you ever take a naked photograph of yourself without having at least some expectation or understanding that it would possibly get out?
[QUOTE=Justin Case;44422202]Attending the funeral isn't psychopathic behavior, it shows serious regret[/QUOTE]
While that's true, she still seems like a complete psychopath.
[QUOTE=Shreddinger;44422175]Link to cp?
[highlight]User was banned for this post ("Insensitive Shitposting" - postal))[/highlight]
[highlight]User was banned for this post ("Predicting Moderation" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Fake ban / dumb" - Craptasket))[/highlight][/QUOTE]
creep
I'm going to label the bans with more details when people are acting like retarded creeps. Hopefully that'll steer people away from making posts like that.
[QUOTE=lolman122;44424185]Why would you take that picture in the first place? And not delete it afterwards?[/QUOTE]
It may have been using something like SnapChat where she thought it would have been deleted but the friend saved it.
Or she just had way too much trust in her friend.
[QUOTE=Swebonny;44425282]I'm going to label the bans with more details when people are acting like retarded creeps. Hopefully that'll steer people away from making posts like that.[/QUOTE]
should just perma them instead.
[editline]1st April 2014[/editline]
jokingly asking for child pornography is still asking for child pornography
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;44425305]should just perma them instead.
[editline]1st April 2014[/editline]
jokingly asking for child pornography is still asking for child pornography[/QUOTE]
"But no you see I'm the same age so that makes it ok
Right"
[QUOTE=UncleJimmema;44425028]Why would you ever take a naked photograph of yourself without having at least some expectation or understanding that it would possibly get out?[/QUOTE]
If you're taking a naked photograph it's already out.
I don't get why people take naked photos of themselves and don't intend to show it to anybody. Are they going to masturbate to themselves or something?
id stab her with my penis
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Another shitty post in SH." - postal))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Kite_shugo;44421826]Except for the fact that this horrible human being is under 18 so she will get better leeway in court that she does NOT deserve. I hope she is tried as adult[/QUOTE]
It's Mexico, not the U.S. rest assured her life will be Hell.
[QUOTE=WitheredGryphon;44425284]It may have been using something like SnapChat where she thought it would have been deleted but the friend saved it.
Or she just had way too much trust in her friend.[/QUOTE]
I still don't understand why snapchat even has that feature. Either make it a permanent picture messaging software or make it so screenshots can't happen. You can't really have a middle ground for this kind of thing. Especially when the program SHOWS you when someone has screenshotted whatever picture you sent, like some sort of "haha I have this pic forever now and you can't do shit about it" fuck you to whoever sent it originally.
[QUOTE=villa;44427729]I still don't understand why snapchat even has that feature. Either make it a permanent picture messaging software or make it so screenshots can't happen. You can't really have a middle ground for this kind of thing. Especially when the program SHOWS you when someone has screenshotted whatever picture you sent, like some sort of "haha I have this pic forever now and you can't do shit about it" fuck you to whoever sent it originally.[/QUOTE]
Some people like to be assholes and download one of the many programs that allow you to save SnapChats without notifying the sender. But I don't think they're able to disable screenshotting since that's a built in function to iPhones so that's probably why the best they could do is notify the sender if you try without a special program to do it.
[QUOTE=villa;44427729]I still don't understand why snapchat even has that feature. Either make it a permanent picture messaging software or make it so screenshots can't happen. You can't really have a middle ground for this kind of thing. Especially when the program SHOWS you when someone has screenshotted whatever picture you sent, like some sort of "haha I have this pic forever now and you can't do shit about it" fuck you to whoever sent it originally.[/QUOTE]
There is nothing they can do because one could still just take a picture of the screen with a camera.
because naked photographs are gonna do more damage to your reputation than stabbing a person 65 times
I've heard of girls taking selfies alone, in pairs or even in groups showing their tits, never heard of full nude selfies though. Weird. And come on, you would be in hot water enough showing underage tits on facebook, especially of your friend who has not given permission, but full nude photos? Jeez.
Of course it doesn't excuse the behavior of her friend, good lord.
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;44425305]should just perma them instead.
[editline]1st April 2014[/editline]
jokingly asking for child pornography is still asking for child pornography[/QUOTE]
ok, regardless of how dumb that guy is and how little sense his posts made, you know there's quite a lot of people on facepunch between 16-20, right? it's pretty stupid to label someone who wants to see pictures of a girl a couple years younger than them as being the same as the people involved with legitimate child porn communities. people who barter and exchange for videos/pictures of 5-12 year olds being sexually abused.
[QUOTE=Bruhmis;44428771]ok, regardless of how dumb that guy is and how little sense his posts made, you know there's quite a lot of people on facepunch between 16-20, right? it's pretty stupid to label someone who wants to see pictures of a girl a couple years younger than them as being the same as the people involved with legitimate child porn communities. people who barter and exchange for videos/pictures of 5-12 year olds being sexually abused.[/QUOTE]
he obviously knew that his post was creepy given the idiotic fake bans. and tried to make a joke out of it, and asking for child pornography. which makes him a creep in and of itself.
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;44429092]he obviously knew that his post was creepy given the idiotic fake bans. and tried to make a joke out of it, and asking for child pornography. which makes him a creep in and of itself.[/QUOTE]
it's not about him though it's about your condemnation of someone's ''request for child pornography'' which is effectively downplaying what that actually means.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.