David Cameron put 'private part' in dead pig's mouth, shock biography claims

[Disgruntled]

Never met an conservative who wasn't also a hypocrite.

[HoodedSniper]

[QUOTE=Mister Sandman;48728638]I don't really think being a college student or drunk excuses necrophiliac bestiality[/QUOTE]

Dont think anyone excused it. But I bet it was more "Hahha dude check this out" and less of passionately fucking a pig head because he was attracted to it and into bestiality. Necrophiliac bestiality is just you trying to make it sound so horrible.

[benzi2k7]

[QUOTE=HoodedSniper;48729294]Dont think anyone excused it. But I bet it was more "Hahha dude check this out" and less of passionately fucking a pig head because he was attracted to it and into bestiality. Necrophiliac bestiality is just you trying to make it sound so horrible.[/QUOTE]but it was necrophilic beastiality

[Rossy167]

[QUOTE=Disgruntled;48729248]Never met an conservative who wasn't also a hypocrite.[/QUOTE]

I despise Cameron as much as the next far left liberal but to be perfectly honest I've never met anyone who wasn't a hypocrite, including myself.

[Awesomecaek]

[QUOTE=HoodedSniper;48729294]Dont think anyone excused it. But I bet it was more "Hahha dude check this out" and less of passionately fucking a pig head because he was attracted to it and into bestiality. Necrophiliac bestiality is just you trying to make it sound so horrible.[/QUOTE]

I think that this is less about "he's an inexcusable, twisted human trash" and more "wow, what a creepy hypocrite*

[NiandraLades]

What're the odds this allegation will turn out to be untrue

[Rossy167]

[QUOTE=NiandraLades;48729694]What're the odds this allegation will turn out to be untrue[/QUOTE]

The odds are that nobody can prove it either way and the burden of proof is on the accuser.

[benzi2k7]

[QUOTE=NiandraLades;48729694]What're the odds this allegation will turn out to be untrue[/QUOTE]
it's a very directed and smart attack on cameron by lord ashcroft, ashcroft was snubbed by david in 2010 (didnt get the job he was promised) after funding the conservatives in the run-up to the election

i mean, we have an establishment that protects and facilitated pedophiles back in the 70s/80s/now/forever, fucking a pigs head is pretty tame/believable in comparison

[editline]21st September 2015[/editline]

[video=youtube;bRhlRM6rYck]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRhlRM6rYck[/video]

[Zezibesh]

[QUOTE=benzi2k7;48729426]but it was necrophilic beastiality[/QUOTE]
It's only necrophilic if he has an attraction to dead things in general

[benzi2k7]

[QUOTE=Zezibesh;48729838]It's only necrophilic if he has an attraction to dead things in general[/QUOTE]necrophilia can apply to both the act and the attraction

[Pepsi-cola]

#PigGate has been the top trend on Twitter for hours now.

And this happened on live TV.

[url]https://twitter.com/DanBennett11/status/645885659241148416[/url]

[Fulcrum]

[QUOTE=Pepsi-cola;48730062]#PigGate has been the top trend on Twitter for hours now.

And this happened on live TV.

[url]https://twitter.com/DanBennett11/status/645885659241148416[/url][/QUOTE]

I kind of feel sorry for Cameron and his family. Even if he did bone a pig skull it was kinda a private thing, likihood is if he hadn't: he'd be dicked on, kicked outta the club and woulda hit the curb pronto. Instead of attacking him we should be asking why allegedly he did it and why influential people end generally come from those clubs.

Thats assuming he did it, it is just an allegation...

[benzi2k7]

[QUOTE=mdeceiver79;48730091]I kind of feel sorry for Cameron and his family. Even if he did bone a pig skull it was kinda a private thing, likihood is if he hadn't: he'd be dicked on, kicked outta the club and woulda hit the curb pronto. Instead of attacking him we should be asking why allegedly he did it and why influential people end generally come from those clubs.

Thats assuming he did it, it is just an allegation...[/QUOTE]maybe he shouldn't have sticked his dick in a dead pigs head to get into a fancy oligarch club

[a dumb bear]

hahaha yeah most students do dumb shit but sticking your dick in a dead pigs mouth is just fucked up, idk why some people are sympathising with David here.

[karlosfandango]

If pigs could fly, pork will go up.

[crumbleshake]

I'm a student of the age he would have been when he did it, can confirm that I would never ever put my penis near any non human animal living or dead because it's fucked up. Do I have a more developed moral compass than the leader of my country did at my age? Honestly, his age doesn't excuse anything, this is obscene.

[Fulcrum]

[QUOTE=benzi2k7;48730099]maybe he shouldn't have sticked his dick in a dead pigs head to get into a fancy oligarch club[/QUOTE]

That's like saying "We should blame the capitalist for underpaying the worker" when the system gives them no other option. If the capitalist didn't screw over the world and employees he would surely fail and be beaten by someone else who did.

Likewise if "politician X" didn't join rich boys club and use the influence to become PM then someone else would have.

In both scenarios we have the same outcome regardless of the subject dudes actions, so instead of blaming the arbitrary subject dude we should blame the system and then reform the system.

[Darknote]

And of course, this is a thing now.
[url]https://twitter.com/cameronpig[/url]

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/cL95Vdf.png[/IMG]

[Fulcrum]

[QUOTE=CrumbleShake;48730123]I'm a student of the age he would have been when he did it, can confirm that I would never ever put my penis near any non human animal living or dead because it's fucked up. Do I have a more developed moral compass than the leader of my country did at my age? Honestly, his age doesn't excuse anything, this is obscene.[/QUOTE]

You have a different mentality than him.
You have slave morality - you value being good, kind and fair (judging from your posts)
He has the master morality - this values winning and power above being kind.

So to a master morality person "the right thing to do" is to win and be powerful. To a slave morality person "the right thing to do" isn't necessary to have power but to ensure others are better off and sticking to principles.

The way they are named is a little off putting (The guy who theorised it valued master morality and looked down on slave morality). Personally I think slave morality is the way to go.

Chances are he saw the only way to parle favour in the rich boy club was to do something which didn't sit right; but he values the favour/influence to be gained above something which was supposed to be a secret act of debauchery.

[benzi2k7]

[QUOTE=mdeceiver79;48730124]That's like saying "We should blame the capitalist for underpaying the worker" when the system gives them no other option. If the capitalist didn't screw over the world and employees he would surely fail and be beaten by someone else who did.

Likewise if "politician X" didn't join rich boys club and use the influence to become PM then someone else would have.

In both scenarios we have the same outcome regardless of the subject dudes actions, so instead of blaming the arbitrary subject dude we should blame the system and then reform the system.[/QUOTE]okay...? but he fucked a dead pigs head, regardless of what he did it for

[ThisGuy0]

I don't understand why some people are taking this so seriously. I mean this is hilarious but it's totally irrelevant to him as a politician.

[quote]The book also claims he was part of a "dope smoking group" called the Flam Club at university, according to the Daily Mail.

James Delingpole, a friend of Mr Cameron's at Oxford, said they smoked cannabis together while listening to the rock band Supertramp.

He said: "My drug of choice was weed – and I smoked weed with Dave."[/quote]

This seems a lot more significant to me. The hippocracy is incredible.

[Fulcrum]

[QUOTE=benzi2k7;48730145]okay...? but he fucked a dead pigs head, regardless of what he did it for[/QUOTE]

If he hadn't then someone else would have.

If that person had then perhaps he might have given the tory peer what he wanted for money (CORRUPTION!) and we never would have heard of it.

I see it as a problem in the system rather than with the person. Don't get me wrong, I hate Cameron. I would soon see him leave government and any kind of position of power but I don't think its right to use it against him, when we could instead use it to make lasting changes to tackle corruption and end the rich boy groups which are turning this country into an oligarchy.

Consider motives. If they all do dodgy illegal stuff then they all have leverage over each other. SO it becomes in their interest to serve the interests of others in the group. Those groups are full of politicians and CEOs. If it is in their interest to look after each other so we end up with CEOs/rich assholes manufacturing leverage over politicians. So in the event of the politician not serving the rich asshole he can whip out his trump card in a power play, both to punish and to keep any other politicians inline. <- for that reason we shouldn't focus on Cameron because it will just scare the other politicians and help the rich asshole blackmail them.

[benzi2k7]

[QUOTE=mdeceiver79;48730167]If he hadn't then someone else would have.

If that person had then perhaps he might have given the tory peer what he wanted for money (CORRUPTION!) and we never would have heard of it.

I see it as a problem in the system rather than with the person. Don't get me wrong, I hate Cameron. I would soon see him leave government and any kind of position of power but I don't think its right to use it against him, when we could instead use it to make lasting changes to tackle corruption and end the rich boy groups which are turning this country into an oligarchy.[/QUOTE]but he fucked a pigs head

[Fulcrum]

[QUOTE=benzi2k7;48730182]but he fucked a pigs head[/QUOTE]

I edited and added some stuff. Including this.

[quote=arealycooldude]
So in the event of the politician not serving the rich asshole he can whip out his trump card in a power play, both to punish and to keep any other politicians inline. <- for that reason we shouldn't focus on Cameron because it will just scare the other politicians and help the rich asshole blackmail them.[/quote]

By vilifying Cameron we are helping the rich assholes black mailing him.

edit: Its a damn scruffy thing to do (if he did it) but we're not making anything better by attacking him for it.

[karlosfandango]

I'm assuming the pig's head was procured for said purposes?
What concerns me more, was David batting on a sticky wicket?

[Curls]

[QUOTE=mdeceiver79;48730167]If he hadn't then someone else would have.[/QUOTE]

how is this even an argument ever, it doesn't make it any better or worse. Justifying something by saying "Someone would have done it", if anything, just sounds terrible.

Frankly though I don't care what Cameron did, even if fucking a dead pigs head is horrifically pervy. He's still known for doing plenty enough crap already, it only drags him down even more.

[benzi2k7]

[QUOTE=mdeceiver79;48730190]I edited and added some stuff. Including this.

By vilifying Cameron we are helping the rich assholes black mailing him.

edit: Its a damn scruffy thing to do (if he did it) but we're not making anything better by attacking him for it.[/QUOTE]well if rich assholes decide to fuck over another rich asshole for a change, what's the downside in comparison to the norm? the conservative party will still be the same but now we know that the leader of our country stuck his dick in a dead pigs head it's incredible

[Fulcrum]

[QUOTE=benzi2k7;48730206]well if rich assholes decide to fuck over another rich asshole for a change, what's the downside in comparison to the norm? the conservative party will still be the same but now we know that the leader of our country stuck his dick in a dead pigs head it's incredible[/QUOTE]

Its not just a rich assholes fucking over another rich asshole.

Its a unelected individual blackmailing and exercising leverage over an elected member of government to further private interests.

Corruption.
Undemocratic.

Cameron got screwed because he didn't give Ashcroft what he wanted Ie for once he put national interests/his own interests of not getting done for corruption in front of the rich assoles interests. Because of that the story was broken.

If we attack Cameron then other politicians might see whats happening to Cameron and decide to just give into the demands of the black mailed.

So ultimately Cameron will be shamed, rich asshole will continue blackmailing and winning, politicians will continue to be blackmailed and corruption will prevail.

Alternatively, target the blackmailers and the institutions which make it possible. Target the rich boy clubs and the groups which engineer rich assoles and politicians to have that "symbiotic" relationship.

[BusterBluth]

You guys are sure quick to trust a claim that one person is making without any evidence what so ever, a very nast claim at that. As someone else said, the person who wrote the book is someone who has a very deep problem with Cameron. Its pretty fucking awful to write nasty shit about a person because you have a political problem with them. But because its David Cameron the book is about I'm sure a lot of you are going to roll with it

[benzi2k7]

[QUOTE=BusterBluth;48730316]You guys are sure quick to trust a claim that one person is making without any evidence what so ever, a very nast claim at that.[/QUOTE]the fact that it's Lord Ashcroft puts it on another level tbh