• Topless Protest in Austin
    263 replies, posted
It is legal in Canada
I'm wondering why non-americans are butting in this thread. Though obviously the reply is something around the lines of because im voicing my opinion or i want to comment.
[QUOTE=Javascript;24280150]because breasts are reproductive organs[/QUOTE] boobs are where the baby is stored why do you think they call them twins, duh
[QUOTE=Tukimoshi;24280521]Nipples are a sexually-neutral organ, similar to [b]arms and legs[/b]. [b]There is no specified reason why Males have them[/b], hence why we don't have to cover them.[/QUOTE] :v:
Why do we have legs we can slither like snakes. I just noticed Monomiro is a friend from steam :buddy: [sp] and not a single fuck was given that day [/sp]
Men who go around in public without a shirt are retarded
[QUOTE=scorpion8754;24280947]Men who go around in public without a shirt are retarded[/QUOTE] mostly surfer douchebags
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;24280417]Were not tribes now are we. I grew up as a christian and became agnostic/athiest.[/QUOTE] :v: [QUOTE=xxncxx;24280186]Womens breasts are sexual, mens are not. Therefore, children should not be exposed to them on a daily basis as they do not need to see saggy tits everyday. I mean, THINK OF THE CHILDREN![/QUOTE] :v: [QUOTE=wanksta11;24280892]It is legal in Canada[/QUOTE] :q: REALLY?
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;24280905]I'm wondering why non-americans are butting in this thread. Though obviously the reply is something around the lines of because im voicing my opinion or i want to comment.[/QUOTE] Because they're just pointing out how silly your fear (lol) is that women will start "walking topless daily" a) even in places where it IS legal (i.e. Canada) [I]it doesn't happen[/I]. It only means that a woman wouldn't get arrested for going topless on the beach or whatever. b) even if it did, what a sense of entitlement you have to demand that they not have the same right as you simply because you have some pointless personal notion as to what is acceptable
[QUOTE=Rubs10;24280838]People only find boobs sexually appealing because they are "forbidden fruit" and society expects it to be sexually appealing. Just like women showing their legs way back when was also seen as something naughty. Allow women to go topless, and you'll start to see less people attracted to boobs because they're just a part of every day life. Pros: People don't see it as something to look down upon in society. Cons?: Guys stop being so hugely attracted to breasts?[/QUOTE] what if liking breasts is something that guys like to enjoy? what if the reason that legs were considered naughty is because people were sexually attracted to them? (I highly doubt it because it seems very odd, but just an example) the whole argument is that if guys should be able to be topless then so should women, but are most women attracted to men's breasts? maybe certain male bodies are attractive, but i doubt being sexually attracted without a boner is as bad as with a boner. yeah, they might get hard nipples but it is easier to cover that up.
[QUOTE=Rubs10;24280838]People only find boobs sexually appealing because they are "forbidden fruit" and society expects it to be sexually appealing. Just like women showing their legs way back when was also seen as something naughty. Allow women to go topless, and you'll start to see less people attracted to boobs because they're just a part of every day life. Pros: People don't see it as something to look down upon in society. Cons?: Guys stop being so hugely attracted to breasts?[/QUOTE] Legs are still definitely "attractive" on a sexy girl. Not saying I have a leg fetish but I think you know what I mean. Now at first, when I came in here expecting just post like "Well fuck yeah let's let them be topless", but as I read the arguments, I became a little more conservative in my thinking. I definitely think it would be sort of exploited in so many ways....there's just so many situations that I don't feel like getting in to it really. But also, I think you guys gotta remember that part of the reason males are attracted to breasts to begin with is because it's natural instinct. There was a thread about this a few months ago or something in GD. Now unless the women making this argument are primarily feminists, I've got to say that the first sort of thought that comes to mind about this is that these women want to be able to show off their breasts in public for some sort of sexual reason. Maybe they want to have a better chance of picking up a guy by showing their boobs...I don't know....but it's not ridiculous, because after all, it is natural. I'm having trouble sort of summing my thoughts up, parting because there is kind of a lot to this, but I do feel that in retrospective that it makes sense to allow women to appear topless in public, despite the sexually provocative image that breasts can/do have.
[QUOTE=Goofa;24279890]Who the fuck even walks around without a shirt on. Male or Female, society expects you to wear a shirt while you go about your day.[/QUOTE] Are you really that ignorant?
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;24280905]I'm wondering why non-americans are butting in this thread. Though obviously the reply is something around the lines of because im voicing my opinion or i want to comment.[/QUOTE] Does it matter? This topic basically applies to the population as a whole.
There should be no laws on public nudity.
[QUOTE=xxncxx;24280248]Yes, yes it is. You don't want 5 year olds having sex do you? If they see them on a daily basis, then their parents are going to have to tell them about sex. [editline]10:38PM[/editline][/QUOTE] Breasts don't really have anything to do with sex.
[QUOTE=oOaltOo;24281141]Are you really that ignorant?[/QUOTE] you are being ignorant of the fact that that person has an opinion. if anything, come up with an argument to counter his ignorance.
I think the fact that boobs are utters flew over everybody's heads. At least the people that think boobs are sex organs.
[IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/aukini1.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Monomiro;24280913]:v:[/QUOTE] I meant, there is no reason for why we have nipples. Reading in the context of it though, it does look quite funny.
[QUOTE=Kybalt;24280686]i could allude to you be a closet homosexual, but i think instead i will tastefully say that youre conceded, since you just want something, as if the universe revolves around you.[/QUOTE] *Conceited. He didn't just give in to your point of view.
In toronto women are allowed to walk around topless. However, only the ugly, fat dykes do it.
I read this as topless priest in Austin.
The only people that would walk around topless are the ugly ones really.
lol, bunch of desperate people who just want to see some tits in here. I'm glad the laws are in place, most girls who have boobs worth looking at cover them up because they like to leave something to the imagination, they're teases. The ones who want to strut around topless are the ugly feminist cunts that think it's liberating. So yeah, take away the public nudity laws and have fun looking at breasts that sag like your ballsack.
[QUOTE=General Omega;24280086]Men do not have reproductive organs on our chest. [/QUOTE] well actually the difference between male and female breasts are simply size and the breast is an exocrine organ, not a reproductive one [editline]09:26PM[/editline] [QUOTE=xxncxx;24280137] Unless your baby wants to be retarded, yes, they are reproductive organs.[/QUOTE] this is probably the dumbest thing i've read in a very long time
This isn't going to accomplish anything, even if they made it legal to be topless tomorrow, women wouldn't suddenly take off their tops. This is like when you were a little kid and someone next to you was playing with a toy. You really wanted to play with it, but when you finally got to you just said 'Wow this isn't really that great'.
[QUOTE=FunnyBunny;24281996]This isn't going to accomplish anything, even if they made it legal to be topless tomorrow, women wouldn't suddenly take off their tops. This is like when you were a little kid and someone next to you was playing with a toy. You really wanted to play with it, but when you finally got to you just said 'Wow this isn't really that great'.[/QUOTE] That's not the point. The point is to give them the right to do it.
[QUOTE=Ehmmett;24282031]ITT: Idiots think that it means that [B]EVERY[/B] woman will go topless.[/QUOTE] Welcome to Facepunch good sir. Do the accommodations suit you well?
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;24279902]Also Breast aren't supposed to be shown to little kids and shit daily.[/QUOTE] No I'm pretty sure that's who they're most supposed to be shown to [editline]12:47AM[/editline] There's literally no reason for breasts to be taboo except that they arouse men. The function they perform isn't even sexual unless you want it to be. Dudes can be aroused by feet, does that mean everyone should have to wear socks constantly?
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;24280855]that's like saying men will stop liking pussy if they watch too much porn.[/QUOTE] ..actually...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.