[QUOTE=IceWarrior98;45003591]This guys facebook is only a few months old. And it is literally nothing but anti-goverment, pro-gun crap.
This doesn't seem right.[/QUOTE]
Are we not even waiting until it's over to cry "False flag" now?
[QUOTE=Starlight 456;45003642]Are we not even waiting until it's over to cry "False flag" now?[/QUOTE]
I'm not crying false flag. Unstable people do this sort of stuff all the time. It's just strange that his profile was made last February and all of it's content consists of anti-government stuff. And then the last thing he posts if a Megadeth lyric. It's like a field day for Fox.
Is this guy dead yet or what
[QUOTE=IceWarrior98;45003657]I'm not crying false flag. Unstable people do this sort of stuff all the time. It's just strange that his profile was made last February and all of it's content consists of anti-government stuff. And then the last thing he posts if a Megadeth lyric. It's like a field day for Fox.[/QUOTE]
Could be an alt facebook for whatever reason? Maybe was planning to do it but just needed something to make him go full crazy.
[QUOTE=Starlight 456;45003642]Are we not even waiting until it's over to cry "False flag" now?[/QUOTE]
Well I mean he's also been accepting facebook friend requests (during the habbening, and probably not from a mobile device since they could use that to track his location) and has only 50 some (probably all random added) friends.
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;45003505]Sounds like the ass-backwardsness of the gun laws here in Canada. And likewise, I could write an essay on why it's all stupid and ineffectual.[/QUOTE]
Personally I'm of the belief that tragedies are the best time to talk about possible solutions to future tragedies, but didn't you post only a few minutes ago that you believe it's abhorrent when people use tragedies to push their agenda?
You realize you're in a thread about a guy shooting police pushing your pro-gun agenda, right?
the dude looks like he's thinks the russians invaded
[QUOTE=Zeke129;45003723]Personally I'm of the belief that tragedies are the best time to talk about possible solutions to future tragedies, but didn't you post only a few minutes ago that you believe it's abhorrent when people use tragedies to push their agenda?
You realize you're in a thread about a guy shooting police pushing your pro-gun agenda, right?[/QUOTE]
I'm not trying to use his actions to support or push my agenda, I'm making a statement of opinion about the state of our gun laws, one I have made many times before in many situations.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;45003724]the dude looks like he's thinks the russians invaded[/QUOTE]
no thats the cops in north america
[QUOTE=Lonestriper;45003329]I find it really strange that someone actually took a photo of the guy walking on the nature strip. Why wouldn't you run the fuck away[/QUOTE]
The photo was taken by one of the local papers, someone grabbed it and started circulating it online. They likely had a very high zoom lens and didn't get anywhere near him
What the fuck
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;45003292]It's rather sad when politicians use a tragedy like this to push their agendas.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Zeke129;45003723]You realize you're in a thread about a guy shooting police pushing your pro-gun agenda, right?[/QUOTE]
I have noticed this before actually. As soon as a thread about a mass shooting of some king shows up, usually there is somebody who says "Don't talk about guns! They're completely unrelated to this event and it's due to poor mental health provision." This is often followed by somebody saying "Politicians are abusing this event to pass more gun control legislation".
The fact that these same people often happen to be firearm owners and push in these messages quickly in order to shut down debate about tightening gun legislation. The potential conflict of interest does not seem fully appreciated here.
honestly i would of shot that fuck while he was off gaurd or busy trying to shoot someone else if i saw him. My reasoning, He's a danger to myself and others around me. Kinda surprised nobody has done this yet.
[QUOTE=Rhenae;45003767]The photo was taken by one of the local papers, someone grabbed it and started circulating it online. They likely had a very high zoom lens and didn't get anywhere near him[/QUOTE]
Not sure it matters anyway. So far he hasn't shown any sign of being hostile toward civilians.
But to be safe, don't go outside for a while.
[editline]4th June 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=confinedUser;45003776]honestly i would of shot that fuck while he was off gaurd or busy trying to shoot someone else if i saw him. My reasoning, He's a danger to myself and others around me. Kinda surprised nobody has done this yet.[/QUOTE]
This is Canada.
Sure the amount of guns you own is proportionate to how far North you live, but not everyone is ready and willing to take someone elses life.
I think he is pretending to be Solid Snake.
I wonder if a civilian had a clear shot at the guy and called 911 asking if he or she should shoot him, what 911 would say.
[editline]4th June 2014[/editline]
Well, the Canadian equivalent of 911
[QUOTE=urbanmonkey;45003817]I wonder if a civilian had a clear shot at the guy and called 911 asking if he or she should shoot him, what 911 would say.
[editline]4th June 2014[/editline]
Well, the Canadian equivalent of 911[/QUOTE]
The dispatcher would likely tell the civilian to remain hidden and safe. I'm not sure under what circumstance they would tell you outright to take the shot.
[QUOTE=IceWarrior98;45003796]Not sure it matters anyway. So far he hasn't shown any sign of being hostile toward civilians.
But to be safe, don't go outside for a while.
[editline]4th June 2014[/editline]
This is Canada.
Sure the amount of guns you own is proportionate to how far North you live, but not everyone is ready and willing to take someone elses life.[/QUOTE]
right, i guess things are way different in Canada but here people have no problem taking someone out if they were to try and pull this stunt.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;45003771]I have noticed this before actually. As soon as a thread about a mass shooting of some king shows up, usually there is somebody who says "Don't talk about guns! They're completely unrelated to this event and it's due to poor mental health provision." This is often followed by somebody saying "Politicians are abusing this event to pass more gun control legislation".
The fact that these same people often happen to be firearm owners and push in these messages quickly in order to shut down debate about tightening gun legislation. The potential conflict of interest does not seem fully appreciated here.[/QUOTE]
I said what I did because I do hate when mass-shootings are used to push a gun control agenda because they're anomalies in the grand scheme of crime, and politicians use them in an attempt to scare the general public about guns so they can ban them and look like they're trying to do something about crime, when in reality they're ignoring the fact that about 90% of shootings that occur involve gangs in some way because trying to deal with gang violence takes too long and costs too much money. If someone wants to talk gun control, I'll happily debate them, but it should be done on the evidence-based merits thereof, not on fear-mongering nonsense and emotions following a high-profile shooting, and generally emotions and fear-mongering are what politicians use to try and pass gun control on the tail of a high-profile shooting.
[editline]4th June 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=urbanmonkey;45003817]I wonder if a civilian had a clear shot at the guy and called 911 asking if he or she should shoot him, what 911 would say.
[editline]4th June 2014[/editline]
Well, the Canadian equivalent of 911[/QUOTE]
It's 911 here too, and the dispatcher would probably tell them to get inside, lock all doors and windows, and put their gun away. Later, the police would probably come by and charge the person with careless use of a firearm, pointing a firearm, and numerous other firearms offences.
[QUOTE=confinedUser;45003832]right, i guess things are way different in Canada but here people have no problem taking someone out if they were to try and pull this stunt.[/QUOTE]
you're vastly overestimating the capability of the average person to straight merc a dude, even if he's a threat
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;45003836]It's 911 here too, and the dispatcher would probably tell them to get inside, lock all doors and windows, and put their gun away. Later, the police would probably come by and charge the person with careless use of a firearm, pointing a firearm, and numerous other firearms offences.[/QUOTE]
Are you kidding? If you shoot and kill someone whose been hunting police all day, I think they'd give you a pat on a bat and take you out for a beer. It's Canada, don't forget that.
[QUOTE=IceWarrior98;45003796]Not sure it matters anyway. So far he hasn't shown any sign of being hostile toward civilians.
But to be safe, don't go outside for a while.
[editline]4th June 2014[/editline]
This is Canada.
Sure the amount of guns you own is proportionate to how far North you live, but not everyone is ready and willing to take someone elses life.[/QUOTE]
Some of the largest collectors of firearms actually live in urban centres, and tend to work decently-paying jobs. There's nearly a hundred thousand gun owners in the City of Toronto alone. The further "out north" you are, the greater likelihood you'll have at least 1 gun in your house, but in urban centres it's likely a gun owner will have at least 2 (a deer rifle and a turkey/waterfowl shotgun at the minimum), or more (in all likelihood, they'll have several hunting guns, a few guns for plinking, some guns they bought because they were cheap, and a pistol or a few).
Hope the fucker gets pumped full of lead.
[QUOTE=Derpmeifter;45003849]you're vastly overestimating the capability of the average person to straight merc a dude, even if he's a threat[/QUOTE]
no, i just know people who can actually use a damn gun a lot of them have automatics anyways so the second they start spraying your done fucked.
[QUOTE=confinedUser;45003881]no, i just know people who can actually use a damn gun a lot of them have automatics anyways so the second they start spraying your done fucked.[/QUOTE]
I've watched Die Hard too. Good movie.
this is bullshit
Moncton is such a fucking nice lovely community, I mean no one deserves to be shot up but moncton is picteresque small town canada
goddamnit
[QUOTE=IceWarrior98;45003871]Are you kidding? If you shoot and kill someone whose been hunting police all day, I think they'd give you a pat on a bat and take you out for a beer. It's Canada, don't forget that.[/QUOTE]
It's because it's Canada that I said that. We don't reward self-defence, we reprimand it most of the time. I'm snipping the rest of this, I was getting a bit too pushy in my agenda. It was examples backing up my statement at the beginning of this post.
also don't dress like naked snake when you disgrace my country like this you fuck come on
you know I love metal gear
[QUOTE=Code3Response;45003878]Hope the fucker gets pumped full of lead.[/QUOTE]
I hope he gets captured and taken through the legal process and given a fair hearing before sentencing, and that execution is not an option.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;45003944]I hope he gets captured and taken through the legal process and given a fair hearing before sentencing, and that execution is not an option.[/QUOTE]
We abolished the death penalty in the '70s. What I'm concerned about is the way our parole system works, this guy has the potential to be out in 25 years.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
