Sanders Campaign Says Photo Proves Clinton Broke Rules During Univision Debate - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Lord of Ears;49913859]what if we all worked together to help educate uninformed voters instead of jacking off over how much more intelligent we are[/QUOTE] It literally takes less than 30 seconds to hop on Google and read into a candidates viewpoints on their website. In the time it takes to post about how uninformed you are and how you might vote for Trump because you're "pissed off" you could have already formed a meaningful opinion without anybody else guiding you along the way.

[QUOTE=srobins;49913867]It literally takes less than 30 seconds to hop on Google and read into a candidates viewpoints on their website. In the time it takes to post about how uninformed you are and how you might vote for Trump because you're "pissed off" you could have already formed a meaningful opinion without anybody else guiding you along the way.[/QUOTE] Too hard to actually look at where everyone stands.

[QUOTE=srobins;49913780]You really, really shouldn't vote. Anyone that has such a juvenile method of choosing the next leader of the free world should be barred from voting. If there were an office somewhere that I could mail this post to and disqualify you from voting, my printer would be buzzing right now and I'd be on my way to the mailbox.[/QUOTE] The majority of the country would be disqualified from voting and the majority of candidates would never get any votes. That wouldn't be democracy anymore, but I think it would a lot better than the current shitshow where so many people vote for entirely arbitrary reasons; good luck actually achieving that though. [editline]11th March 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=srobins;49913867]It literally takes less than 30 seconds to hop on Google and read into a candidates viewpoints on their website. In the time it takes to post about how uninformed you are and how you might vote for Trump because you're "pissed off" you could have already formed a meaningful opinion without anybody else guiding you along the way.[/QUOTE] Yea, looking at a candidate's viewpoints on their website is almostly completely pointless though; it doesn't actually tell you anything, because candidates aren't going to point out the bad with themselves. You're basically just comparing idealized pictures of each candidate if you do that.

[QUOTE=srobins;49913867]It literally takes less than 30 seconds to hop on Google and read into a candidates viewpoints on their website. In the time it takes to post about how uninformed you are and how you might vote for Trump because you're "pissed off" you could have already formed a meaningful opinion without anybody else guiding you along the way.[/QUOTE] Except you have no idea how much is bullshit or real with trump and Hilary

[QUOTE=srobins;49913780]You really, really shouldn't vote. Anyone that has such a juvenile method of choosing the next leader of the free world should be barred from voting. If there were an office somewhere that I could mail this post to and disqualify you from voting, my printer would be buzzing right now and I'd be on my way to the mailbox.[/QUOTE] hilariously enough, i'd be doing the same to you for this post.

[QUOTE=Anti Christ;49914357]hilariously enough, i'd be doing the same to you for this post.[/QUOTE] Why do that when you can just vote Trump? :v: In case anyone can't tell I'm being sarcastic. But no, saying someone is voting for X therefore they shouldn't vote is fucked up. How about you inform people on how to make the best possible choice? It's difficult but as was said earlier in thread, it's not like Clinton will outline that she's a copious liar and flip flopper. I'd argue trying to teach someone is better than going "you have the wrong opinion, therefore it shouldn't count." Makes you come off as a royal ass.

[QUOTE=Pvt. Martin;49910989]If this bitch, who keeps fucking and tripping and still comes out on top wins the primaries, fuck everything, fuck the system, and fuck the government, I'm gonna vote for Trump just because fuck it.[/QUOTE] I don't know if you just really love sanders, or really hate clinton, (the later most likely) but it's REALLY REALLY clear that your emotions are overtaking your judgement. Trump is a million times worse than clinton, [URL="http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/sanders-clinton-on-her-worst-day-still-infinitely-better-than-any-goper/ar-CC6IFi"]bernie even said it himself[/URL]. You're voting for the most destructive candidate on the basis of "EVERYTHING IS SHIT", which is probably the worst reason to vote for someone.

I hope there's 17 more scandals, each worst than the last, between now and anywhere before the near end of primaries, because I dunno what we can do to get Bernie elected at this point because it seems nobody fucking cares what wrong Clinton does.

[QUOTE=gk99;49914506]I hope there's 17 more scandals, each worst than the last, between now and anywhere before the near end of primaries, because I dunno what we can do to get Bernie elected at this point because it seems nobody fucking cares what wrong Clinton does.[/QUOTE] We just got another one Clinton Praised Nancy Reagon's response to the HIV outbreak.

As I said in previous threads, Clinton on the DNC ticket is a win for any GOP candidate

The GOP has so much ammunition to use against Clinton that making her the nomination will end up being an uphill battle for them. The GOP has been preparing to take her down for years now since the scandals started coming. If somehow Sanders is chosen, most of the ammo they have goes out the window. If you watch the debates the GOP candidates already assume Clinton will win and aim all their attacks on her, they rarely even mention Sanders. The DNC will be playing right into the GOP's hands by choosing Clinton

[QUOTE=srobins;49913818]As an obvious exaggeration meant to drive home the point that anyone who jumps between 3 radically different candidates without even reading into their basic political stances and policy proposals should just stay at home on election day..?[/QUOTE] Hillary and Bernie Sanders are not radically different by any stretch.

[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;49915024]Hillary and Bernie Sanders are not radically different by any stretch.[/QUOTE] I find one far more trustworthy than the other.

[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;49915024]Hillary and Bernie Sanders are not radically different by any stretch.[/QUOTE] That's a good one. She only started "vigorously agreeing" with Sanders when it became clear she couldn't win by being American center-right. Before Sanders ruined her coronation she was really for TPP and pro-NAFTA as fuck for instance. Now she's suddenly "always been a critic of NAFTA" and doesn't like TPP either. Her "shared" opinions with Sanders don't seem genuine when you look back at her record both in voting, and rhetoric.

[QUOTE=Bradyns;49911023]Is that inflammatory language really necessary? I'm in no way a fan of Clinton but that just seems really lowbrow.[/QUOTE] She [i]is[/i] a bitch, it's accurate and not lowbrow, it's not a big deal what he chooses to call her given everything she stands for as a corrupt and shitty politician.

[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;49915024]Hillary and Bernie Sanders are not radically different by any stretch.[/QUOTE] How so?