• Catholic Church Threatens the City of Washington D.C. over Gay Rights Bill
    493 replies, posted
[QUOTE=archangel125;18378585]And I'm a furry.[/QUOTE] Rated bad spelling because I can't rate ban.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;18378624]Rated bad spelling because I can't rate ban.[/QUOTE] Rated funny to make you feel better.
[QUOTE=archangel125;18378821]Rated funny to make you feel better.[/QUOTE] Rated artistic because I clicked randomly.
[QUOTE=SpiritOfTheRedman;18359937]Oh yes let's encourage civil rights by taxing one group specifically, aren't you just a beacon of tolerance, "fuck them" indeed. [editline]12:10AM[/editline] Don't worry, teenage rebellion fades with age.[/QUOTE] Soooo... what you're saying is that we shouldn't tax a group of people, but instead suppress their rights to be married? Even if they aren't married, they'll still be together. They'll live together if they are old enough and the relationship is strong enough. They'll fuck if their relationship is strong enough and they are (hopefully) old enough. My two aunts just had their third baby with the help of artificial insemination in a state where gay marriage isn't a legal right, and they aren't married. So, and no offense to any gays with children out there, but all you're (well, the group you represent in this discussion) going to accomplish is a bunch of bastard babies. (Bastard being used as its intended purpose, not as an insult.)
[QUOTE=Mr don't care;18371750]Your wife should get in the kitchen and make me dinner. As for you I don't think the church has anything against [b]non-religous[/b] marriages, only christian marriages, that is two people married in a church by a priest. This is the kind of marriage I was reffering to even if i didn't mention it in my last post and if this isn't the kind of marriage you had then it doesn't matter and you can do whatever you want. If you was married in a church by a priest then it was religous no matter what you say and so technically you should follow their rules. end of[/QUOTE] I'm sure you're a real ladies man with that attitude. Also, you said they frown upon lust, so sex without procreation is a sin. I don't see the difference between a gay marriage and ours except we're a heterosexual couple. That's it. Also, you don't technically have to do shit if you choose not to.
I think gay people should be able to experience the pain of married life like regular people.
[QUOTE=Arbitration;18380609]I think gay people should be able to experience the pain of married life like regular people.[/QUOTE] I'm positive this is from a comedian's standup act.
Go home Catholics...
Don't they realize discriminating against gays is against their religion?
[QUOTE=Drasnus;18358010]When will the Church realize we don't need them anymore?[/QUOTE] Go kill yourself. Your going to hell anyway.
I don't really care about gay rights. Because [I]I'm not gay.[/I] :smug:
Fucking dogmatic assholes continuing to give us real Christians a bad name. edited: [QUOTE=DamagePoint;18383555]Don't they realize discriminating against gays is against their religion?[/QUOTE] This.
Fuck the Church man. [editline]10:32AM[/editline] They have no rights in political matters and none of them seem to get it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.