• 9 Year Old Girl Shot as Home Intruding Skunk.
    129 replies, posted
How the fuck do you mistake a girl for a skunk?
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;38139360]Increase taxes on gun manufacturers.[/QUOTE] So now poor people can't own guns. The poorest and most disenfranchised section of the population who have more reason than most to own firearms, can't own them because of taxes. Anyhow, I feel sorry for the little girl. Who the fuck confuses a skunk for a kid is beyond me. Then again, I never understood how hunters were confused for deer. People are just stupid.
[QUOTE=GunFox;38139482]So now poor people can't own guns. The poorest and most disenfranchised section of the population who have more reason than most to own firearms, can't own them because of taxes. [/QUOTE] It would force many gun producers to downsize or go out of business.
[url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1219643&p=38117239#post38117239]The tables have [B]TURNED[/url][/B]
[QUOTE=TCB;38139533][url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1219643&p=38117239#post38117239]The tables have [B]TURNED[/url][/B][/QUOTE] Technically, this was posted afterwards so it'll only work if you posted that in the other thread referring to this one. Otherwise you'll just be making a nonsensical chronological error.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;38139510]It would force many gun producers to downsize or go out of business.[/QUOTE] How does that help? It just makes it harder to get guns in general rather than filtering people who could be dangerous out.
[QUOTE=Rents;38139680]How does that help? It just makes it harder to get guns in general rather than filtering people who could be dangerous out.[/QUOTE] If you want rid of guns, that's one of the things you do. It doesn't matter if you are right or wrong in restricting the supply of guns.
It really does seem like every thread turns into an argument about gun control. On a relevant note, that guy must've been on fucking [i]something.[/i] Or high, insane, retarded, blind. All five?
[QUOTE=Monkeyfisker;38140170]It really does seem like every thread turns into an argument about gun control.[/QUOTE] because they're about the foibles of gun ownership.
A 3-4 foot tall bipedal skunk sounds like one of the most frightening creatures imaginable, especially if it's coming straight at you. There's no way being shitfaced has anything to do with this, no sir. Even though he was [i]clearly[/i] intoxicated, there's a [i]chance[/i] he may have thought he was in danger by one of these mutant freaks of nature, and not that of what I am assuming is his niece due to being a relative. That's why they're questioning on charging him.
[QUOTE=BANNED USER;38140331]A 3-4 foot tall bipedal skunk sounds like one of the most frightening creatures imaginable, especially if it's coming straight at you. There's no way being shitfaced has anything to do with this, no sir. Even though he was [i]clearly[/i] intoxicated, there's a [i]chance[/i] he may have thought he was in danger by one of these mutant freaks of nature, and not that of what I am assuming is his niece due to being a relative. That's why they're questioning on charging him.[/QUOTE] He wasn't under any influence of alcohol.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;38139360]Increase taxes on gun manufacturers.[/QUOTE] so now instead of everyone owning guns, only the rich own guns congrats you don't understand a thing about the economy or gun politics. [editline]22nd October 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Sobotnik;38139704]If you want rid of guns, that's one of the things you do. It doesn't matter if you are right or wrong in restricting the supply of guns.[/QUOTE] the problem is that only idiots want to actually get rid of guns
Why would anyone try to shoot a skunk anyway? Waste of bullets.
[QUOTE=BANNED USER;38140331]A 3-4 foot tall bipedal skunk sounds like one of the most frightening creatures imaginable, especially if it's coming straight at you. There's no way being shitfaced has anything to do with this, no sir. Even though he was [i]clearly[/i] intoxicated, there's a [i]chance[/i] he may have thought he was in danger by one of these mutant freaks of nature, and not that of what I am assuming is his niece due to being a relative. That's why they're questioning on charging him.[/QUOTE] i've had some monster racoons come after me before a big skunk would make me shit my pants and go into fight or flight mode, so i'm not surprised he shot the little girl
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;38139360]Increase taxes on gun manufacturers.[/QUOTE] I would've said something reasonable like increase the severity of background checks, but yeah sure Go with the most retarded and least helpful idea first, okay
Suggestions like increasing "the severity of background checks" aren't going to work on stopping anyone other than the person buying the gun from a store. Afterwards, that gun can be given to any random person. How would that stop guns being given to mentally unstable people or people with criminal backgrounds?
That's one big 'skunk'.
Why would you ever shoot a skunk near your house? It would smell for AGES afterward, even if you buried it.
If you asked that guy "What's black and white and red all over?" he'll reply "Um...a skunk...or a nine year old, it's all the same to me."
gun control grrrr
Well that's going to really fuck up that little girls relationship with her relative
[QUOTE=NoDachi;38140386]He wasn't under any influence of alcohol.[/QUOTE] You're right, then really I can only assume he's nuts or not saying everything.
That'll learn that varmint.
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;38140536]so now instead of everyone owning guns, only the rich own guns congrats you don't understand a thing about the economy or gun politics.[/QUOTE] Not quite. Taxing something does well to discourage it. If you put a tax on windows, people will brick them up. You also assume that the tax increase would be so insanely high that people would not be able to afford guns anymore. That would not be the case. It would become more difficult to buy guns. [QUOTE=ButtsexV3;38140536]the problem is that only idiots want to actually get rid of guns[/QUOTE] Really? Can you explain why they are idiots? [editline]23rd October 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;38141760]I would've said something reasonable like increase the severity of background checks, but yeah sure Go with the most retarded and least helpful idea first, okay[/QUOTE] It still discourages production of firearms however.
[QUOTE=Ramen;38141979]Suggestions like increasing "the severity of background checks" aren't going to work on stopping anyone other than the person buying the gun from a store. Afterwards, that gun can be given to any random person. How would that stop guns being given to mentally unstable people or people with criminal backgrounds?[/QUOTE]If that person gives their legally acquired gun to a nutter, criminal or some other person who is not legally allowed to have one, they're one trial away from prison rape; even worse if a crime was committed with that gun.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;38145490]Really? Can you explain why they are idiots?[/QUOTE] Guns aren't the problem. If you get rid of the guns people will just kill each other with other weapons. You need to be looking at the glorification of violence in mainstream media, the "thug" attitude that many lower-class citizens have developed, and the underlying issue of poverty in the United States. I've seen this metaphor floating around and it describes the issue pretty well. Banning guns is like slapping a bandage over a festering wound. The infection is still there and it's going to keep getting worse until it's treated properly. All a bandage will do is make you feel like you've done something to help the problem.
My sister went trick or treating as grass once. Glad nobody tried to mow her.
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;38145673]Guns aren't the problem. If you get rid of the guns people will just kill each other with other weapons. You need to be looking at the glorification of violence in mainstream media, the "thug" attitude that many lower-class citizens have developed, and the underlying issue of poverty in the United States. I've seen this metaphor floating around and it describes the issue pretty well. Banning guns is like slapping a bandage over a festering wound. The infection is still there and it's going to keep getting worse until it's treated properly. All a bandage will do is make you feel like you've done something to help the problem.[/QUOTE] Except you can't just call all people who are for gun control to be "Idiots".
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;38145785]Except you can't just call all people who are for gun control to be "Idiots".[/QUOTE] watch me
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;38145787]watch me[/QUOTE] Would you advocate the removal of all gun control?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.