North Korea Says it can Take Out Manhattan with a Single Hydrogen Bomb

[Itauske]

[QUOTE=soulharvester;49949607]Because It was a thought that popped into my mind and I like posting my unpopular opinions so that I can defend them sometimes?

So? It's an opinion, I'm not literally sitting in Kim's office advocating for why NYC is a better choice than the most obvious target for NK aggression.

If NK Nukes SK, SK's gone, that culture's never coming back if it gets destroyed, if NYC does, we'd rebuild/replace it, probably.[/QUOTE]

But not after nuking the shit out of NK

[CapitalismHo!]

[QUOTE]If NK Nukes SK, SK's gone, that culture's never coming back if it gets destroyed, if NYC does, we'd rebuild/replace it, probably. [/QUOTE]

well, I guess you could replace the millions if not biollions of dollars that went into NYC over all this time, yeah.
All the cultures, history and people that mingled and grew in new york could definitely be replaced too, yeah.

the fuck kind of morbid post is this. disregarding the fact that nuking either palce is horrible i just don't get why you'd choose new york as if it won't have equal repurcussions if not greater to those in SK, not to denounce them.

[soulharvester]

I didn't choose them specifically, that's who NK Threatened.

Manhattan Island, AKA New York New York?

[thekillersan]

Manhattan isnt that big? :s its as tiny as the rest of their body