Trump launches 'LyingCrookedHillary.com' - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Cone;50566932]"cowboy" still applies in the UK vernacular of a "cowboy builder" i.e. an unqualified tradesman who wastes the hiree's money on low-quality construction that breaks immediately and fails in its purpose, then leaves without fixing it sounds familiar[/QUOTE] In that context it would make a lot more sense.

[QUOTE=Cone;50566932]i.e. an unqualified tradesman who wastes the hiree's money on low-quality construction that breaks immediately and fails in its purpose, then leaves without fixing it sounds familiar[/QUOTE] yeah this too

[QUOTE=Maegord;50565550]I guess LyingHillary and CrookedHillary.com were already taken?[/QUOTE] [url=http://whois.domaintools.com/lyinghillary.com]LyingHillary.com Whois[/url] [url=http://whois.domaintools.com/crookedhillary.com]CrookedHillary.com Whois[/url] Second one is under a proxy, but both are registered with GoDaddy so I feel like it's probably the same person. [url=http://whois.domaintools.com/lyingcrookedhillary.com]LyingCrookedHillary.com Whois[/url] Shows that it's also registered with GoDaddy and under a proxy as well, Trump could have all three of the domains. :v:

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;50566822]I use cowboy trump because he sleeps around with a lot of women. Maybe manwhore would be better? Idk[/QUOTE] You're not very good at this trash talking thing are you?

[QUOTE=Mingebox;50567005]You're not very good at this trash talking thing are you?[/QUOTE] Not really, Trump is a professional when it comes to being nasty to people.

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;50566825]By November it's going to be LyingCrookedUglyStupidOldNastyMeanHillary.com[/QUOTE] A bit of a mouth full but we can abbreviate it to: #LCUSONMH - You should trend that dude.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;50566224]i'm actually wondering how much money cowboy trump is making from all this[/QUOTE] calling Trump a cowboy is a compliment. In America, cowboys are seen as tough, independent men who can handle difficult situations calmly and do what's needed to be done no matter how brutal it is.

This is actually a smart move from whoever thought this up on Trump's campaign payroll. If the website manages to get enough recognition and there is clear evidence of Hillary lying (which shouldn't be too hard), he knows that he will be the better of two evils - which is pretty much what this election is.

So the US campaigns have turned into a school playground "you started it" fight?

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;50566224]i'm actually wondering how much money cowboy trump is making from all this[/QUOTE] I wonder too, hasn't he started basically stopping the fund for his campaign now?

[QUOTE=Cone;50566932]"cowboy" still applies in the UK vernacular of a "cowboy builder" i.e. an unqualified tradesman who wastes the hiree's money on low-quality construction that breaks immediately and fails in its purpose, then leaves without fixing it sounds familiar[/QUOTE] Over here cowboy kind of means a person who goes off on everything half-cocked (even though actual cowboys still exist and probably don't like it much), which fits Trump too.

I've taken to calling him "the Trumpet" because he makes a whole lot of meaningless noise.

[QUOTE=Lick;50565270]This is because he doesn't need attack ads[/QUOTE] ftfy He hasn't needed attack ads so far - him talking is enough.

[QUOTE=Falstad007;50584707]ftfy He hasn't needed attack ads so far - [B]him talking is enough[/B].[/QUOTE] I don't know if you understand the point of attack ads. They're to attack the OTHER candidate, not themselves.

[QUOTE=theevilldeadII;50565177]well, with that huge leak he will have alot of content to bass her I have no idea whats worse if trump or clinton gets it.[/QUOTE] I'd say Clinton, she's offering nothing other than keeping the establishment going and Trump not winning. Also being the first woman president, which is meaningless if said first woman president does nothing for 4-8 years.

[QUOTE=Levelog;50584712]I don't know if you understand the point of attack ads. They're to attack the OTHER candidate, not themselves.[/QUOTE] Zing! But really though, he's done well so far just by giving the candidate a nickname (Crooked Hillary, Low-Energy Jeb, Lyin' Ted Cruz) and lambasting them at rallies. He hasn't really needed attack ads.

[QUOTE=Radical_ed;50566323]I think trump's a fucking ass but this is BRILLIANT marketing for him. Keep his little zombies indoctrinated and spouting about X Y or Z whenever he wants them to. He can shift public opinion remotely with what is essentially a grassroots ad campaign that deploys INSTANTLY.[/QUOTE] I think this post is why I'm voting for Trump. Because the Democrat vs Republican "us vs them" mentality has hit a peak with shit like the recent Democratic sit-down in Congress.

[QUOTE=BioWaster;50566572]He's got those meme magicians on his side and despite what people say about him; Hillary has a worse background to exploit in my opinion.[/QUOTE] there are very plausible links to Trump being involved with organised crime in the past and intentionally running small construction firms in New York out of business, I feel like that's pretty bad in itself

[QUOTE=Radical_ed;50566323]I think trump's a fucking ass but this is BRILLIANT marketing for him. Keep his little zombies indoctrinated and spouting about X Y or Z whenever he wants them to. He can shift public opinion remotely with what is essentially a grassroots ad campaign that deploys INSTANTLY.[/QUOTE] Holy shit you're serious aren't you? If trump supporters are indoctrinated zombies hillary supporters must not even be alive, just literal robots. Oh wait. They are.

[QUOTE=Nebukadnezzer;50586238]Holy shit you're serious aren't you? If trump supporters are indoctrinated zombies hillary supporters must not even be alive, just literal robots. Oh wait. They are.[/QUOTE] I don't see Clinton supporters on this forum imitating her style of speaking or even giving her praise at all. I DO see Trump supporters repeating his moronic statements word for word, so I don't know who you're trying to fool.

Because of the twitter and reddit bots. [editline]24th June 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=1nfiniteseed;50586393]I don't see Clinton supporters on this forum imitating her style of speaking or even giving her praise at all. I DO see Trump supporters repeating his moronic statements word for word, so I don't know who you're trying to fool.[/QUOTE] Right, whatever you say

[QUOTE=1nfiniteseed;50586393]I don't see Clinton supporters on this forum imitating her style of speaking or even giving her praise at all. I DO see Trump supporters repeating his moronic statements word for word, so I don't know who you're trying to fool.[/QUOTE] But I do see Clinton supporters bashing Trump supporters on this forum whenever someone decides to attempt to give out their reasons for wanting to vote Trump over Clinton. So there's that. Also no calling trump supporters indoctrinated zombies is stupid, no matter what.

[QUOTE=Pvt. Martin;50586715]But I do see Clinton supporters bashing Trump supporters on this forum whenever someone decides to attempt to give out their reasons for wanting to vote Trump over Clinton. So there's that. Also no calling trump supporters indoctrinated zombies is stupid, no matter what.[/QUOTE] Trump supporters on this forum are intentionally combative to the point of consistent shitposting and trolling. Their hostility is because when people try to have rational fact based arguments, Trump supporters usually ignore them or go on with the same tired rhetoric, endlessly frustrating them. And what else do you call people who not only take everything Trump says at face value , but repeat his own phrases?

[QUOTE=Pvt. Martin;50586715]But I do see Clinton supporters bashing Trump supporters on this forum whenever someone decides to attempt to give out their reasons for wanting to vote Trump over Clinton. So there's that. Also no calling trump supporters indoctrinated zombies is stupid, no matter what.[/QUOTE] I think we have only one real Clinton supporter, the rest of us are "anyone but Trump" supporters who probably, like me, voted for Sanders during their states primaries. I don't bash Trump supporters, I explain with what I feel like are pretty decent arguments (because they are more often than not circumvented rather than tackled) why the reasons they are supporting Trump are misinformed and why he is a bad candidate for POTUS. If that qualifies as "bashing" then I'd have to wonder why you are even on a message board making posts about how much you favor one candidate over another in a political election.

this whole election is a joke. fucking sheep

[QUOTE=1nfiniteseed;50586968]Trump supporters on this forum are intentionally combative to the point of consistent shitposting and trolling. Their hostility is because when people try to have rational fact based arguments, Trump supporters usually ignore them or go on with the same tired rhetoric, endlessly frustrating them. And what else do you call people who not only take everything Trump says at face value , but repeat his own phrases?[/QUOTE] And I'm so sure that the 2-5 pages of posts by angry anti-Trump posters on every fucking thread remotely related to his campaign are full of insightful, wonderful content. Jesus, quit trying to play psychologist with people's political opinions and just let them vote for who they wanna vote for.

[QUOTE=Chonch;50590165]And I'm so sure that the 2-5 pages of posts by angry anti-Trump posters on every fucking thread remotely related to his campaign are full of insightful, wonderful content. Jesus, quit trying to play psychologist with people's political opinions and just let them vote for who they wanna vote for.[/QUOTE] I'm not playing psychologist, anyone can see and comprehend what they're getting at. And Jesus Christ, why are people getting so offended over being challenged on their views? If they don't want people to ask them to explain their positions or call them out over blatantly wrong things, they shouldn't post.

[QUOTE=Chonch;50590165]just let them vote for who they wanna vote for.[/QUOTE] Nope. Awful idea. It is worth challenging a persons reasoning for voting for a given candidate. If only to actually get them to reflect on their reasoning and see if they still feel sure about their choice. Look at the EU referendum, a sizeable number of leave voters have come out saying "what have I just done" (in essence) because they didn't actually know what they voted for until it was too late to back out. If they had been adequate challenged on their views (or heard enough snappy buzzwords from the opposition I suppose), perhaps things would be different and the UK wouldn't have caused trillions of dollars in economic damage in an hour.