Distorted? Are you kidding? Maybe, [b]just maybe[/b] it's because the bbc is telling the truth.
Every article thus far I've tried to put out here has been smeared with silly accusations of bias, I figured a trusted news source like the bbc would at least be free of these pathetic accusations.
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;13132052]Distorted? Are you kidding? Maybe, [b]just maybe[/b] it's because the bbc is telling the truth.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1554749/BBC-report-finds-bias-within-corporation.html[/url]
[url]http://www.bbcbias.co.uk/[/url]
Yes, now explain how the hell I am suppose to trust this? Especially since you seem to find bias just because you disagree. (not to mention throughout this thread I've probably posted articles from over 30 different sites)
[QUOTE=doggunn]
[url]http://www.bbcbias.co.uk/[/url][/QUOTE]
[quote]David Vance #
WE ARE (NOT) ALL HEZBOLLAH.
I am sure you will have read the BBC report of "just a few" rockets being launched from southern Lebanon into Israel overnight. [B](aka Iran opens the northern front).[/B] I invite you to compare the paucity of the BBC coverage of the impact these rockets have had on the Israeli population at the receiving enfdwith that here from Fox. I suppose there wasn't the room given the BBC need to further character assassinate Israel. Your views?[/quote]
Hmm yes this is a completely valid.
[quote]I am sorry to read of the death of Sir Alan Walters [B]- the man who was Mrs Thatcher's great economic guru and whose vision helped Mrs Thatcher restore our prosperity as a nation to the horror of the BBC[/B]. Iain Dale has the story here, as has All Seeing Eye. The BBC does not seem to know about this at time of posting (All those £££ billions and yet this miss this?) but I think it will be interesting to see how they cover it tomorrow morning. Any bets on how the BBC will treat Sir Alan's memory?[/quote]
hahaha holy shit
[quote]SCIENCE AND ISLAM.
Make sure that you tune in tomorrow night to BBC 4 where "in the first of a new series entitled "Science and Islam" physicist Jim Al-Khalili travels through Syria, Iran, Tunisia and Spain to tell the story of the great leap in scientific knowledge that took place in the Islamic world between the 8th and 14th centuries. Its legacy is tangible, with terms like algebra, algorithm and alkali all being Arabic in origin and at the very heart of modern science - there would be no modern mathematics or physics without algebra, no computers without algorithms and no chemistry without alkalis. For Baghdad-born Al-Khalili this is also a personal journey and on his travels he uncovers a diverse and outward-looking culture, fascinated by learning and obsessed with science".
[B]LOL - you couldn't make it up. Outward-looking culture.[/B][/quote]
Heh yeah those ayrabs huh? LOL
This source is so pathetic it's hilarious
Chippay, it doesn't matter, obviously their bias if they say anything pro palestine.
The point was how the BBC makes their articles bias, I don't agree with many of the points or arguments presented on that blog.
This is completely interesting and hasn't been happening for several years.
[quote]David Vance #
MISSING WORDS
It's so tortuous. Get this.. "A Danish man of Palestinian origin has been arrested on suspicion of shooting and wounding two Israeli salesmen at a shopping centre in Odense in Denmark." Anything to avoid saying Muslim, eh?
Thanks to George R for spotting this gem of BBC obsfucation![/quote]
Holy shit this just gets worse and worse
[QUOTE=doggunn;13132264]The point was how the BBC makes their articles bias, I don't agree with many of the points or arguments presented on that blog.[/QUOTE]
Awesome, so you post sources and you don't agree with the points on the source. Also the word is biased. Biased.
You know you wouldn't have to backtrack and say "WELL I DON'T ACTUALLY AGREE WITH MANY OF THOSE THINGS" if you actually looked at what 'sources' you use before you posted them. Just a thought.
Well I guess automerge is gone, so much for that.
[QUOTE=doggunn;13132264]The point was how the BBC makes their articles bias, I don't agree with many of the points or arguments presented on that blog.[/QUOTE]
You can turn a blind eye to the fact that Israel did in fact attack UN and Red Cross relief. Just keep turning a blind eye whenever the atrocities get pointed out to you.
It's alright.
[QUOTE=Chippay;13132282]Holy shit this just gets worse and worse[/QUOTE]
Once again, I don't agree with the points or the arguments, but it does point out the tactics used by BBC to modfiy an articles bias.
With that blog post you've quoted, I honestly he's stupid for writing that.
[QUOTE=Chippay;13132305]Awesome, so you post sources and you don't agree with the points on the source. Also the word is biased. Biased.
You know you wouldn't have to backtrack and say "WELL I DON'T ACTUALLY AGREE WITH MANY OF THOSE THINGS" if you actually looked at what 'sources' you use before you posted them. Just a thought.
Well I guess automerge is gone, so much for that.[/QUOTE]
I am sooo sorry I spelt biased, bias.. boohoo.
I looked at the sources I posted, and read them, and as I noted earlier, I used them to point out how the BBC modifies their articles.
[QUOTE=doggunn;13132376]I am sooo sorry I spelt biased, bias.. boohoo.
I looked at the sources I posted, and read them, and as I noted earlier, I used them to point out how the BBC modifies their articles.[/QUOTE]
You've been misspelling it every single time you used the term, for this entire thread. I just thought you might want to know you've been making a fool out of yourself.
And I would take Vitamins from a drugdealer before I would accept someone's accusations of bias who a paragraph below laughs at the idea of Muslim culture. It's like citing Pravda as reasons why the Soviet Union was the best country in history.
[QUOTE=Chippay;13132429]You've been misspelling it every single time you used the term, for this entire thread. I just thought you might want to know you've been making a fool out of yourself. [/QUOTE]
Making a personal attack on someone is just silly. Doesn't prove anything, but a lack of argument.
[QUOTE=Chippay;13132429]And I would take Vitamins from a drugdealer before I would accept someone's accusations of bias who a paragraph below laughs at the idea of Muslim culture. It's like citing Pravda as reasons why the Soviet Union was the best country in history.[/QUOTE]
Awesome.
This reminds me of the Lebanon invasion. At one point they bombed Christian Lebanon .
Seeing that's where my grandfather came from it became personal.
[QUOTE=doggunn;13132503]Making a personal attack on someone is just silly. Doesn't prove anything, but a lack of argument.
Awesome.[/QUOTE]
If you take being corrected on the fact you've been using the wrong word for weeks now as a personal attack you have problems far beyond what I can do in this thread. It's no wonder you can see a supossed bias in everything that isn't praising the glorious efforts of Israel in civilizing the barbaric Palestinians if that's what you qualify as a "personal attack."
Just honestly, at this junction in world history, how can anyone support what Israel is doing? I mean honestly, the amount of people that have thus far died is beginning to look a lot like genocide.
The ratio is 765 to 14, and 3 of those deaths were from Lebanon in retaliation! so really the death toll is 11 to 765 if you count the "evil palestinian murders" only
(not to mention the UN and Red Cross workers that have died)
[QUOTE=Chippay;13132594]If you take being corrected on the fact you've been using the wrong word for weeks now as a personal attack you have problems far beyond what I can do in this thread.[/QUOTE]
... [quote=Chippay]I just thought you might want to know you've been making a fool out of yourself. [/quote]
[QUOTE=Chippay;13132594]It's no wonder you can see a supossed bias in everything that isn't praising the glorious efforts of Israel in civilizing the barbaric Palestinians if that's what you qualify as a "personal attack."[/QUOTE]
Not at all. I do not condone Operation Cast Lead, or the amount of civilian loss, or even the tactics used. But I do respect and support Israel's right to defend themselves from the HAMAS, and rocket attacks.
They wouldn't have to defend themselves at all if they didn't cut off aid to gaza. But of course, this fact has been circulating throughout this thread for the last 60 pages, so you clearly don't care.
[QUOTE=doggunn;13132688]...
Not at all. I do not condone Operation Cast Lead, or the amount of civilian loss, or even the tactics used. But I do respect and support Israel's right to defend themselves from the HAMAS, and rocket attacks.[/QUOTE]
If repeatedly misusing a word when you're attempting to debate on a higher level isn't making a fool out of yourself you have pretty low standards on that. Maybe you can lower your standards on that and redistribute the extra to raising your standards on what a personal attack is?
[QUOTE=Chippay;13132594]If you take being corrected on the fact you've been using the wrong word for weeks now as a personal attack you have problems far beyond what I can do in this thread. It's no wonder you can see a supossed bias in everything that isn't praising the glorious efforts of Israel in civilizing the barbaric Palestinians if that's what you qualify as a "personal attack."[/QUOTE]
I have watched your little rant now for a while, and yea personal attack is what your doing. I would have phrased it more elegantly, as such "your being a cocksucker". All your doing is trying to flame and discredit the other guy, because you yourself have no point.
Also why can't a guy post an article saying look how biased this is? When the fuck did that mean he belived it.
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;13132729]They wouldn't have to defend themselves at all if they didn't cut off aid to gaza. But of course, this fact has been circulating throughout this thread for the last 60 pages, so you clearly don't care.[/QUOTE]
Except they've been being attacked since before they cut off aid, so it isn't a fact.
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;13132729]They wouldn't have to defend themselves at all if they didn't cut off aid to gaza. But of course, this fact has been circulating throughout this thread for the last 60 pages, so you clearly don't care.[/QUOTE]
Why should they need to rely on aid? Oh, their Government sucks.
[QUOTE=Chippay;13132755]If repeatedly misusing a word when you're attempting to debate on a higher level isn't making a fool out of yourself you have pretty low standards on that. Maybe you can lower your standards on that and redistribute the extra to raising your standards on what a personal attack is?[/QUOTE]
Arguing over an internet forum - serious business. And what a high standard the argument is. Focusing on a single word which I've spelt wrong.
I send out my condolences to those who have lost family members in Palestine. :patriot:
[QUOTE=toastonrye;13132802]I have watched your little rant now for a while, and yea personal attack is what your doing. I would have phrased it more elegantly, as such "your being a cocksucker". All your doing is trying to flame and discredit the other guy, because you yourself have no point.
Also why can't a guy post an article saying look how biased this is? When the fuck did that mean he belived it.[/QUOTE]
He posted a completely bias article with no credit, then he himself said he doesn't like half the stuff on the blog.
That's why
[QUOTE=doggunn;13132820]Why should they need to rely on aid? Oh, their Government sucks.
[/QUOTE]
This post makes no sense. Sorry they aren't a wealthy, western supported (with military donations) nation. No fucking shit they need aid, they were under seige.
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;13132834]He posted a completely bias article with no credit, then he himself said he doesn't like half the stuff on the blog.
That's why[/QUOTE]
The point was to display how the BBC does not report fairly... I never posted that blog with the intention of proving points or supporting Israel at all. I thought that was obvious.
How can you say that the blog was even credible???
[QUOTE=toastonrye;13132802]I have watched your little rant now for a while, and yea personal attack is what your doing. I would have phrased it more elegantly, as such "your being a cocksucker". All your doing is trying to flame and discredit the other guy, because you yourself have no point.
Also why can't a guy post an article saying look how biased this is? When the fuck did that mean he belived it.[/QUOTE]
Sorry I'm not doing "personal attack" as you so elegantly put it. I'm correcting him on a word he's used wrong well over 20 times in [I]just[/I] this thread alone.
English isn't your first language though, is it?
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;13132838]This post makes no sense. Sorry they aren't a wealthy, western supported (with military donations) nation. No fucking shit they need aid, they were under seige.[/QUOTE]
You'd expect that they would be able to get off their feet and create a decent standard of living from the amount of aid they have recieved, but they don't. They have been supported from countries world-wide, but never manage to do shit.
Just get used to it. Nothing will change over the next 12 days.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.