• EA Not Interested in More Movie Games
    91 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Punkrock77;26404161]The Warriors was a great movie-based game. But this is good regardless.[/QUOTE] But The Warriors was made 26 years after the movie. Most movie games are made in less than a year to match the movies release date and have to turn the few action scenes of the movie into a whole game.
[QUOTE=not_Morph53;26404354]Superman 64.[/QUOTE] Goldeneye (N64) [editline]30th November 2010[/editline] Also, good move by EA.
NO MORE SHITTY GAMES!! :D... Errr... NO MORE SHITTY [I]MOVIE[/I] GAMES! :D WE ARE SAVED! /caps
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;26404306]spiderman 2[/QUOTE] That strayed pretty far from what the movie was about.
Good riddance. Tired of these hack job games cluttering the store shelves.
Thank fuck. I hate reused movies and sequels that don't add anything. Almost every single movie-to-game I've played has been shit. I'm pretty sure there's maybe like one or two that I did like but I can't remember them. [editline]30th November 2010[/editline] Oh yeah the Spiderman games.
If they would make games that are in the same universe as the movies, rather than one that basically just tells the story of the movie with an outdated engine and shitty gameplay, they might have something.
[QUOTE=WeekendWarrior;26404207]Games don't make good movies. Movies don't make good games.[/QUOTE] MrJazzy should be forced to watch every film that Uwe Boll had directed.
[QUOTE=not_Morph53;26404474]MrJazzy should be forced to watch every film that Uwe Boll had directed.[/QUOTE] Far Cry :eek:
[QUOTE=Ignhelper;26401034]And I'll laugh at Activision making shrek games and shit.[/QUOTE] And Activision'll be laughing all the way to the bank with parents buying them because their dear little timmy can't play a game with violence
[QUOTE=not_Morph53;26404474]MrJazzy should be forced to watch every film that Uwe Boll had directed.[/QUOTE] I never said there were any good films based on games because I've never seen one. Doom.. oh god... Resident Evil...
[quote=OP][img]http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/bloodstonereview.jpg[/img][/quote] EA didn't make or publish this game.
[QUOTE=markg06;26404498]And Activision'll be laughing all the way to the bank with parents buying them because their dear little timmy can't play a game with violence[/QUOTE] Then why the fuck is little Timmy playing COD calling everyone 'faggot asshole touchers"? (And yes, when I [b]used[/b] to play COD some kid called me that. And by kid I mean he was 9.
[QUOTE=WeekendWarrior;26404483]Far Cry :eek:[/QUOTE] Alone in the Dark, House of the Dead, BloodRayne, In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale, Postal, BloodRayne II: Deliverance, BloodRayne 3: The Third Reich. Everyone film, a steaming pile of goat shit.
[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;26404517]EA didn't make or publish this game.[/QUOTE] Maybe if you [i]read the article[/i] you'd see that's the point they are making. They didn't make bloodstone, instead the developers who used to make the Bond games made their own IP, Deadspace.
[QUOTE=Werem00se;26404524]Then why the fuck is little Timmy playing COD calling everyone 'faggot asshole touchers"? (And yes, when I [b]used[/b] to play COD some kid called me that. And by kid I mean he was 9.[/QUOTE] Since when did anyone listen to their parents as a kid unless there was money involved.
[QUOTE=markg06;26405175]Since when did anyone listen to their parents as a kid unless there was money involved.[/QUOTE] ITT: You have a point.
There are some good movie-games. Such as The Great Escape and Riddick.
[QUOTE=PaChIrA;26405519]There are some good movie-games. Such as The Great Escape and Riddick.[/QUOTE] I make exception for Riddick.
Good job EA, getting better and better. Pretty natural to do so, they were fucked up so bad they have nowhere to go but up now.
I'm so glad EA have cleaned up their act, they seem to be an ok publisher now
From raping in house developers with no pay and slave hours to actually deciding to not make shit games. EA, I applaud you.
[QUOTE=PaChIrA;26405519]There are some good movie-games. Such as The Great Escape and Riddick.[/QUOTE] Yeah but they had time to develop them since they weren't just made to cash in on a movie release.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;26405768]Yeah but they had time to develop them since they weren't just made to cash in on a movie release.[/QUOTE] Was saying it in response to the all movie-games suck thing.
[quote]"Considering the total amount of money we have to spend on those types of James Bond games, and the total amount of man-hours we had to put into them, we thought; hell, let's work on our own IP," he said. "The guys who made James Bond games for us, well yeah, they went on and made Dead Space."p[/quote] So true. Most of the time, movie games only limit the creativity of game developers.
They JUST realised that movie-based videogames suck?
[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;26404517]EA didn't make or publish this game.[/QUOTE] They used it as a reference.
[QUOTE=markg06;26404498]And Activision'll be laughing all the way to the bank with parents buying them because their dear little timmy can't play a game with violence[/QUOTE] And people will take them even less seriously.
[QUOTE=DinoJesus;26414362]And people will take them even less seriously.[/QUOTE] I haven't taken them seriously since The Big Red One.:colbert:
Holy fuck it took them long enough...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.