Trump appears to read out a Russian propaganda article at a rally - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Raidyr;51195438]What possible incentive does Clinton have to start a war with Russia ?[/QUOTE] None. Trump supporters (such as RIPBILLYMAYS) live in their own fantasy world where Hillary Clinton is actually Malefecient and when she is elected President, will immediately transform into a fire breathing dragon hell bent on world domination.

[QUOTE=FlandersNed;51195269]I'm actually talking about the comments on places saying that America has become too PC and liberal and that Donald Trump will give America a backbone again.[/QUOTE] Oh, I misunderstood. That's still a silly statement though. Alt-Righters think if their candidate wins, then they've suddenly won their "war" with the left and America will become a bastion of Meritocratic Capitalism.

[QUOTE=RIPBILLYMAYS;51194679]Im looking forward to the Clinton supporter bans. Wikileaks keeps dumping emails showing how Clinton handled the Bernie supporters with appeasement and they all jumped on board because they don't like Trump. Whatever happens in November I just hope it ends the hosility that has plagued SH for the last year.[/QUOTE] Trump supporters who still think he has a chance look just like the Sanders supporters that thought he still stood a chance after the caucuses were over. Its time to face reality, man.

[QUOTE=Cructo;51195544]I can go just as you did and say that the Hillary supporters live in their own fantasy world where Trump is actually a Russian plant intended to turn the US into the Soviet States of America This sort of argument leads nowhere[/QUOTE] Apples and oranges. Trump supporters actually believe Clinton will start WW3 while no one believes that nonsense you just scribbled

[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;51195511]None. Trump supporters (such as RIPBILLYMAYS) live in their own fantasy world where Hillary Clinton is actually Malefecient and when she is elected President, will immediately transform into a fire breathing dragon hell bent on world domination.[/QUOTE] That's actually nice compared to what's said about her on The_Donald.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;51194252]I like how Trump can fuck up and you still get around to bashing Hillary.[/QUOTE] This entire election can be summed up with 1 fallacy [t]http://i.imgur.com/RnWgKUd.png[/t]

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51195599]This entire election can be summed up with 1 fallacy[/QUOTE] I like "tu CTR". [editline]12th October 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=Cructo;51195583]I've obviously taken it to the extreme just like you did now. [/QUOTE] You implied it with your comments in the other thread and two other posters have said Clinton means war with Russia.

[QUOTE=Cructo;51195669]The Obama administration has been showing that they are willing to go to war over Syria. Do you think Hillary will back down on that?[/QUOTE] Okay so I wasn't being extreme. How did Obama show his warhawk resolve? By declaring chemical weapons a red line then backing away?

[QUOTE=Chaitin;51193973]Trump is a Russian spy secretly planted by Putin.[/QUOTE] [media]http://twitter.com/borzou/status/786077519757860869[/media]

[url]http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-russian-trump-idUSKCN12C28Q[/url] combine that with this and yeaaaah that's not fucking fishy at all. :tinfoil:

[QUOTE=FinalHunter;51195734]Cowards? How is running away from an unwinnable fight cowardly? Anyone who supports Trump here just gets instantly shit on by a bunch of people, and when they finally get provoked enough to understandably lash out they get banned. So yeah, they either ran away or got banned because nobody wanted to have a discussion or accept their opinions for what they were, opinions. Instead people went on a fucking witch hunt to discredit and demoralize anyone who didn't have the same political beliefs as them, something which happens in SH every five minutes about a multitude of topics, this currently being the worst one. I'm excited for the presidential race to be over so people can get off their fucking high chair over their candidate and stop shitting on people for having a differing viewpoint.[/QUOTE] This. So much this.

[QUOTE=King Tiger;51194539]What's the purpose of dumping on a clownshow candidate over and over again on a forum with extreme Hillary support?[/QUOTE] As one of only a handful of people here who voted for and donated to Clinton over Sanders during the primary, I can tell you it's much less Clinton support as much as it's pure terror at the idea of President Trump that motivates people here. No one is particularly excited for Clinton, and a great deal think she cheated Sanders out of the nomination, but their grievances with her and the greater Democratic party establishment seems like minor complaints to them when compared to Donald Trump fucking around in the White House for four years.

[QUOTE=FinalHunter;51195734]Cowards? How is running away from an unwinnable fight cowardly? Anyone who supports Trump here just gets instantly shit on by a bunch of people, and when they finally get provoked enough to understandably lash out they get banned. So yeah, they either ran away or got banned because nobody wanted to have a discussion or accept their opinions for what they were, opinions. Instead people went on a fucking witch hunt to discredit and demoralize anyone who didn't have the same political beliefs as them, something which happens in SH every five minutes about a multitude of topics, this currently being the worst one. I'm excited for the presidential race to be over so people can get off their fucking high chair over their candidate and stop shitting on people for having a differing viewpoint.[/QUOTE] Trump supporters should be shamed and demoralized tbh.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;51194252]I like how Trump can fuck up and you still get around to bashing Hillary.[/QUOTE] Read the fucking article. It's not the matter of the truth or untruth of the claim (something already established) but speculating where it came from, which is russia. The point of the speculation is to link two particular enemies of clinton and her ideology. Seriously this is one of the dumbest posts I've seen you make. Yea the fact the dems have nominated a hawk who has been agitating against Russia and is linking that to a presidential race is a big fucking problem. How easily this has taken off this election among this nations formerly anti war party because it has a corporate candidate, is a big fucking problem. The most we can conclude here is trump fell victim to conspiracy mongering, but considering, you know, twitter, the alt right, and the recent political culture derived from leaks there's no reason to immediately believe 'the Kremlin is feeding someone in the trump campaign lies'. Thus the wording 'apparently'. Perhaps trump and russians often look for a certain kind of and use the same sources for information? That we're jumping to conclusions about collusions speaks volumes about the intentions of a democratic candidate (with associated party establishment and media) that voted in line with neocons and remains unreformed on world views since then. And yea, that's why my post is relevant, if you can't see why don't even waste our time replying. I couldn't care less about your fake indignation about my 'hillary bashing distraction'

[QUOTE=FinalHunter;51195734]Cowards? How is running away from an unwinnable fight cowardly? Anyone who supports Trump here just gets instantly shit on by a bunch of people, and when they finally get provoked enough to understandably lash out they get banned. So yeah, they either ran away or got banned because nobody wanted to have a discussion or accept their opinions for what they were, opinions. Instead people went on a fucking witch hunt to discredit and demoralize anyone who didn't have the same political beliefs as them, something which happens in SH every five minutes about a multitude of topics, this currently being the worst one. I'm excited for the presidential race to be over so people can get off their fucking high chair over their candidate and stop shitting on people for having a differing viewpoint.[/QUOTE] When somebody supports banning a religion they deserve to be shit on tbh

[QUOTE=RIPBILLYMAYS;51194707]This whole Trump x Russia thing the media and Clinton keep pushing leads me to believe Clinton will start a war with Russia if she makes it into the Oval Office.[/QUOTE]And why exactly would she deliberately start a war with a nuclear power, specifically one that's been considerably modernising said arsenal? Sanctions and proxy wars are where it's at in this day and age m8, and even then I don't really see her going that much further with it than previous presidents.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;51195554]Trump supporters actually believe Clinton will start WW3 while no one believes that nonsense you just scribbled[/QUOTE] I can probably find people who do, both sides have people who believe nonsense.

[QUOTE=Kindashort;51196090][url]http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-russian-trump-idUSKCN12C28Q[/url] combine that with this and yeaaaah that's not fucking fishy at all. :tinfoil:[/QUOTE] Zhirinovsky is an idiot and what he says doesnt mean shit ffs.

[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;51196680]And why exactly would she deliberately start a war with a nuclear power, specifically one that's been considerably modernising said arsenal? Sanctions and proxy wars are where it's at in this day and age m8, and even then I don't really see her going that much further with it than previous presidents.[/QUOTE] So shes just dumb instead of calculated when she says she will take military action against suspected foreign nation hacking of her private email accounts?

[QUOTE=Blizzerd;51197275]So shes just dumb instead of calculated when she says she will take military action against suspected foreign nation hacking of her private email accounts?[/QUOTE] She never said that.

[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;51196680]And why exactly would she deliberately start a war with a nuclear power, specifically one that's been considerably modernising said arsenal? Sanctions and proxy wars are where it's at in this day and age m8, and even then I don't really see her going that much further with it than previous presidents.[/QUOTE] I'm not fond of the idea of Clinton starting yet another goddamn (proxy) war in the Middle East, as judging from the last few years, it means that the European countries somehow have to pay again for a war happening on another continent thousands of kilometres away and its aftermath even if it has absolutely nothing to do with us. This continent ain't a bleeding charity with infinite funds, contrary what some people tend to believe.