• Tea Party counter-protesters join fray in Wisconsin
    251 replies, posted
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;28174352]So glaber doesn't understand grammar either.[/QUOTE] Why don't we take a look at those signs again? [QUOTE=Ridge;28168287][img_thumb]http://i812.photobucket.com/albums/zz46/SuperJay_photo/Protest%20Signs/Sign1.jpg[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s237/carbineman/DSC00674.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] The message is that They would have came yesterday, but something prevented them from coming. It may be improper grammar, but that doesn't change the tense of the word or the message of the sign. [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;28174352]Hey glaber, without sourcing fox news, or without basically repeating, verbatim what your editorial radio hosts tell you to repeat, please, for the love of god, tell me why Why does limiting unions help?[/QUOTE] by limiting US Labor Unions, workers can actually get stuff done and be productive instead of having to wait for all the union workers to get done with what you need for what you need to do. [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;28174352] Why does shutting down planned parenthood?[/QUOTE] Planned parenthood is an Abortion promoter. As long as they still get money from non-government sources, they should still be open, but having them funded by pro-life tax payers is an insult and an affront to their beliefs that life is sacred and must be protected, including the unborn. Shutting them down means that those who want abortions will have to go with a similar service provider that does not get government funding. [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;28174352] redefining rape[/QUOTE] That one doesn't. Why? Do You think I support that? [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;28174352]hell, glaber, you know as well as I do, the last week has just been a week of pure stupidity in the form of bills passed as far as I can tell. [/QUOTE] Not from my perspective. For me the last week has been more about Minecraft, Wisconsin, possible Federal Government shutdown, Comic making, and SRB2 [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;28174352]But I want to give you a chance here glaber, I just want you to tell me, why the hell does any of this stuff help? How is this not classist, rascist, homophobic, sexist, and generally ignorant of our problems?[/QUOTE] Let me ask you the reverse. How is any of this stuff classist, racist, homophobic, sexist, and generally ignorant of our problems? As far as I can tell, Even if Governor Walker is Union busting. it's the Public unions that would be busted. A benefit from this would be that bad teachers could finally get fired instead of claiming tenure and dragging down out education. These things aren't racist as all races are involved on both sides. These things are not homophobic as not once has the subject of homosexuality ever come up in these issues. Sexism is a possibility on the redefining rape issue, but as you should know, I don't support the proposed redefinition. What I would support would be if it was just [quote]Meaning: [+ obj] : to force (someone) to have sex with you by using violence or the threat of violence ▪ He is accused of raping the girl. ▪ She was raped by a fellow student.[/quote] [url]http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/rape%5B1%5D[/url] Now in the Planned parent hood issue, what about the gender of the developing fetus? If it's a girl, should she die because her mother didn't want her? Sure you can argue on behalf of the "Don't Want to be Mother", But there is is still the matter of the yet to be born Girl or Boy. As for how they could be generally ignorant of our problems. Let's see. Limiting Unions: Problem seen: Union Busting. Problem not seen: How can we afford to keep paying for their benefits if they don't put anything into it, and we don't put in a safeguard to prevent the unions from undoing this? Shutting down Planned Parenthood: Problem seen: Shutting down a place that helps with planning for parenthood. Problem not seen: Why should Tax payer money fund an abortion provider? Redefining Rape: Problem seen: Protection of woman's rights. Problem not seen: how to go about it. (This one was handled the wrong way though.) Oh and by the way, I hope those Teachers who are protesting have a lot of sick days to use up still. They're going to need them.
[QUOTE=Glaber;28176880]Why don't we take a look at those signs again? The message is [b]that They would of came[/b] yesterday, but something prevented them from coming. It may be improper grammar, but that doesn't change the tense of the word or the message of the sign.[/quote] Improper capitalization, "would of" instead of "would have" and "came" instead of "come". :doh: [QUOTE=Glaber;28176880]by limiting US Labor Unions, workers can actually get stuff done and be productive instead of having to wait for all the union workers to get done with what you need for what you need to do.[/quote] I work in a union job. The union causes absolutely no issues with me doing what I need to do. Intrusiveness of unions is very overstated. [QUOTE=Glaber;28176880]Planned parenthood is an Abortion promoter. As long as they still get money from non-government sources, they should still be open, but having them funded by pro-life tax payers is an insult and an affront to their beliefs that life is sacred and must be protected, including the unborn. Shutting them down means that those who want abortions will have to go with a similar service provider that does not get government funding.[/quote] This trope is getting pretty tired. I consider myself anti-war, but I accept that my tax dollars will go to fighting wars. Abortion represents 3% of Planned Parenthood's expenses. They receive $75m a year from the government. On average, each American gives them .0075 dollars towards abortion every year. [QUOTE=Glaber;28176880]Let me ask you the reverse. How is any of this stuff classist, racist, homophobic, sexist, and generally ignorant of our problems? As far as I can tell, Even if Governor Walker is Union busting. it's the Public unions that would be busted. A benefit from this would be that bad teachers could finally get fired instead of claiming tenure and dragging down out education. These things aren't racist as all races are involved on both sides. These things are not homophobic as not once has the subject of homosexuality ever come up in these issues.[/quote] Uh, busting the union won't make it any easier to fire bad teachers. It's nigh-impossible to fire tenured college professors, and they don't have a union protecting them. [QUOTE=Glaber;28176880]Now in the Planned parent hood issue, what about the gender of the developing fetus? If it's a girl, should she die because her mother didn't want her? Sure you can argue on behalf of the "Don't Want to be Mother", But there is is still the matter of the yet to be born Girl or Boy.[/quote] Personally, I think it's anhorrent, but abortion to choose the sex of the fetus is protected under the right to privacy. It's no less valid, legally speaking, than any other reason for an elective abortion.
Says the one with the broken quotes
[QUOTE=Glaber;28176880]Planned parenthood is an Abortion promoter. As long as they still get money from non-government sources, they should still be open, but having them funded by pro-life tax payers is an insult and an affront to their beliefs that life is sacred and must be protected, including the unborn. Shutting them down means that those who want abortions will have to go with a similar service provider that does not get government funding.[/QUOTE] Fuck em.
[QUOTE=Glaber;28176880]Why don't we take a look at those signs again? The message is that They would of came yesterday, but something prevented them from coming. It may be improper grammar, but that doesn't change the tense of the word or the message of the sign. [/QUOTE] The irony that was being pointed out is that they're protesting against teacher and they can't even speak proper English. lmbo Maybe they should go back to school.
[QUOTE=Glaber;28176880] The message is that They would of came yesterday, but something prevented them from coming. It may be improper grammar, but that doesn't change the tense of the word or the message of the sign. [/QUOTE] "would of" instead of "would have" is also improper grammar :eng101: maybe if the state government didn't cut it's employee's benefits, the teachers would do a better job of teaching grammar [editline]20th February 2011[/editline] damn beaten by a minute
[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;28176984]The irony that was being pointed out is that they're protesting against teacher and they can't even speak proper English. [B]lmbo [/B]Maybe they should go back to school.[/QUOTE] Yes it's ironic, but the silly thing is, the teacher he's protesting against may be a bad teacher. Do their students even know why they're protesting? A good teacher would have at least taught their students that.
[QUOTE=Glaber;28176944]Says the one with the broken quotes[/QUOTE] Your fault for screwing them up in your post. [editline]20th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Glaber;28177048]Yes it's ironic, but the silly thing is, the teacher he's protesting against may be a bad teacher. Do their students even know why they're protesting? A good teacher [b]would of[/b] at least taught their students that.[/QUOTE] There's no chance in hell you're 24.
[QUOTE=Glaber;28177048]Yes it's ironic, but the silly thing is, the teacher he's protesting against may be a bad teacher. Do their students even know why they're protesting? A good teacher would of at least taught their students that.[/QUOTE] what? so some dude standing outside a government building with a sign making fun of democratic politicans is actually protesting a specific teacher against whom he has a vendetta? [editline]a[/editline] like, is this how schizoid personalities think?
[QUOTE=Prismatex;28177093]Your fault for screwing them up in your post.[/QUOTE] Touché [QUOTE=Prismatex;28177093]There's no chance in hell you're 24.[/QUOTE] Ever hear of an early 90's/late 80's toy called the Incredible crash Dummies? or Nickelodeon's old Monday marathon called Moreonnick Mondays? Or for that matter, a toy line called My Little Mermaid? Oh, and outside of Homework why would a 12 year old even be concerned with politics instead of having fun and homework? Plus, I think my family was still on dailup back when I was 12. Either that or we just switched to DSL. Either way Garry's mod didn't exist back then.
[QUOTE=Glaber;28177048]Yes it's ironic, but the silly thing is, the teacher he's protesting against may be a bad teacher. Do their students even know why they're protesting? A good teacher would of at least taught their students that.[/QUOTE] Glaber is so conservative, he won't change his grammar because even though correcting it would actually make it correct, it's change.
[QUOTE=Glaber;28177471]Touché Ever hear of an early 90's/late 80's toy called the Incredible crash Dummies? or Nickelodeon's old Monday marathon called Moreonnick Mondays? Or for that matter, a toy line called My Little Mermaid? Oh, and outside of Homework why would a 12 year old even be concerned with politics instead of having fun and homework? Plus, I think my family was still on dailup back when I was 12. Either that or we just switched to DSL. Either way Garry's mod didn't exist back then.[/QUOTE] What does Garry's Mod even have to do with this?
[QUOTE=Glaber;28177471]Ever hear of an early 90's/late 80's toy called the Incredible crash Dummies? or Nickelodeon's old Monday marathon called Moreonnick Mondays? Or for that matter, a toy line called My Little Mermaid?[/QUOTE] Thats not the fucking point that point is that your grammer or spelling is atorcious. You wouldn't of used that bad grammer and bad speeling if you wear old enough.
[QUOTE=RBM11;28177708]Thats not the fucking point that point is that your grammer or spelling is atorcious. You wouldn't of used that bad grammer and bad speeling if you wear old enough.[/QUOTE] I believe you made several spelling errors in there as well, to be fair. I believe the proper spelling is "grammar".
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28177755]I believe you made several spelling errors in there as well, to be fair. I believe the proper spelling is "grammar".[/QUOTE] *The joke *Your head
[QUOTE=RBM11;28177796]*The joke *Your head[/QUOTE] Then I apologize, I probably took it too literally.
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28177842]Then I apologize, I probably took it too literally.[/QUOTE] Here's a hint: Every time someone says "speeling", they're joking :v:
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28177679]What does Garry's Mod even have to do with this?[/QUOTE] Just trying to prove my age here. and RBM11. Puh-leese, Adults mess up on grammar and spelling more times than none. EX: People using double negatives such as "I didn't do Nothing" You want to know why I keep using would of instead of Would have? Because I keep hearing would have pronounced like would of and spell it accordingly. You want to complain about grammar and spelling, why not jump on those who use halp instead of help? What in the world is halp anyway?
[QUOTE=Glaber;28177471] Ever hear of an early 90's/late 80's toy called the Incredible crash Dummies? or Nickelodeon's old Monday marathon called Moreonnick Mondays? Or for that matter, a toy line called My Little Mermaid? Oh, and outside of Homework why would a 12 year old even be concerned with politics instead of having fun and homework? Plus, I think my family was still on dailup back when I was 12. Either that or we just switched to DSL. Either way Garry's mod didn't exist back then.[/QUOTE] Hey guys ever heard of catapults and bows and arrows and castles and all that stuff? Yeah I'm from the middle ages. [editline]20th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Glaber;28177982]Just trying to prove my age here. and RBM11. Puh-leese, Adults mess up on grammar and spelling more times than none. EX: People using double negatives such as "I didn't do Nothing" You want to know why I keep using would of instead of Would have? Because I keep hearing would have pronounced like would of and spell it accordingly. You want to complain about grammar and spelling, why not jump on those who use halp instead of help? What in the world is halp anyway?[/QUOTE] Any sane adult knows that "would have" is not "would of" no matter it's pronunciation.
[QUOTE=Glaber;28177982]Just trying to prove my age here. and RBM11. Puh-leese, Adults mess up on grammar and spelling more times than none. EX: People using double negatives such as "I didn't do Nothing" You want to know why I keep using would of instead of Would have? Because I keep hearing would have pronounced like would of and spell it accordingly. You want to complain about grammar and spelling, why not jump on those who use halp instead of help? What in the world is halp anyway?[/QUOTE] It's not that you have bad grammar, it's that you make no effort to correct it or improve it. I literally don't have to correct my grammar because I worked on it and I actually have to try to mess up. Also you must use IE because Firefox has a built in spell check.
[QUOTE=RBM11;28178055]It's not that you have bad grammar, it's that you make no effort to correct it or improve it. I literally don't have to correct my grammar because I worked on it and I actually have to try to mess up. Also you must use IE because Firefox has a built in spell check.[/QUOTE] Just because Firefox has spell check doesn't mean it works for everything. On some words I have to use a search engine because it works better then the built-in spell check does. [QUOTE=Micr0;28178016]Hey guys ever heard of catapults and bows and arrows and castles and all that stuff? Yeah I'm from the middle ages.[/QUOTE] Problem is though, Everyone has heard of those things in history class or in cartoons. Not everyone has heard about specific Cartoon marathons or one off toy lines, including ones started by the Department Of Transportation
Glaber, every time I read your posts I think of this: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNZSXnrbs_k[/media] :h:
Lemme give an analogy a shot here (@ glaber): Planned Parenthood's abortion services make up 3% of all what they provide, the rest being reproductive health, std testing, etc. I would say prob the same percent, maybe less but still there, of a hospital's services would include treating people that one might find abhorrent and truly believe they don't deserve help/deserve to die, like say a drug dealer that got shot or some bank robber that's getting treated before being taken to jail. Why should we fund a hospital if they're going to help people that you think should die, even though it makes up a similar percentage as abortion makes up PP's services?
[QUOTE=Glaber;28177471]Touché Ever hear of an early 90's/late 80's toy called the Incredible crash Dummies? or Nickelodeon's old Monday marathon called Moreonnick Mondays? Or for that matter, a toy line called My Little Mermaid? Oh, and outside of Homework why would a 12 year old even be concerned with politics instead of having fun and homework? Plus, I think my family was still on dailup back when I was 12. Either that or we just switched to DSL. Either way Garry's mod didn't exist back then.[/QUOTE] Nothing you can't really find on Google, Glaber. :v:
[QUOTE=Dalndox;28179239]Nothing you can't really find on Google, Glaber. :v:[/QUOTE] oh well that proves he's telling the truth glaber only uses Seekfind.org for his info
Why should we fund hospitals that treat even crooks? Well hospitals in the US are private institutions that provide health services for all who need them. Be they good or bad, a Doctor's job is to treat the patient. the only way for a hospital to get government funding, that I know of, is through Medicare and Medicaid. There are also all different kinds of hospitals including religious based ones. Hospitals can also treat you in an emergency should it be something like a broken leg, heart attack, a severe Car accident Planned Parenthood is mainly just for what their name says. Hospitals also have a public image of healing the sick and repairing the mangled. Planned Parenthood on the other hand has a public image of an Abortion Provider. Now even though Hospitals provide abortions, these abortions are usually privately funded and because of that, those of us who are against abortions can't really do anything about that. But Abortions through Planned Parenthood are funded with taxpayer dollars, or Public funds. Because of that We can do something about that. [editline]20th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Dalndox;28179239]Nothing you can't really find on Google, Glaber. :v:[/QUOTE] Fine me the More On Nick Monday Marathon that ran Danger Mouse and Banana Man using Google. Seek Find is a bad search engine and doesn't provide me with anything remotely relevant.
[QUOTE=Glaber;28179702]Hospitals also have a public image of healing the sick and repairing the mangled. Planned Parenthood on the other hand has a public image of an Abortion Provider. [/QUOTE] Good to know we've started basing our laws on public perceptions instead of, you know, [u]facts[/u].
[QUOTE=Glaber;28179702]Why should we fund hospitals that treat even crooks? Well hospitals in the US are private institutions that provide health services for all who need them. Be they good or bad, a Doctor's job is to treat the patient. the only way for a hospital to get government funding, that I know of, is through Medicare and Medicaid. There are also all different kinds of hospitals including religious based ones. Hospitals can also treat you in an emergency should it be something like a broken leg, heart attack, a severe Car accident Planned Parenthood is mainly just for what their name says. Hospitals also have a public image of healing the sick and repairing the mangled. Planned Parenthood on the other hand has a public image of an Abortion Provider. Now even though Hospitals provide abortions, these abortions are usually privately funded and because of that, those of us who are against abortions can't really do anything about that. But Abortions through Planned Parenthood are funded with taxpayer dollars, or Public funds. Because of that We can do something about that. [editline]20th February 2011[/editline] Fine me the More On Nick Monday Marathon that ran Dangermouse and Banana Man using google.[/QUOTE] That didn't really have to anything with what I said, but ok. Also you have to pay for abortions the same you have to pay for most any other medical procedure, it's not a pro-bono thing. e: Seriously you completely ignored my entire point, being that why should we fund hospitals when they help people/help people in a way that goes just as much against our morals as PP and abortions do.
[QUOTE=Prismatex;28179748]Good to know we've started basing our laws on public perceptions instead of, you know, [u]facts[/u].[/QUOTE] Duh, Facks? What is facks. IS dat a new word for Obum?
Even if you're morally opposed to abortions, you need to realize that most people get an abortion are poor. If we force poor people to have kids, we're gonna end up with tons of poor kids who will probably be on welfare for long periods of time. And poor young males commit the most violent crimes out of any group. I'm not saying poor people are bad, but if they want to get an abortion...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.