[QUOTE=randomnewfag;29661277]My theory is that different cultures advance at different rates, Christian cultures just managed to evolve faster.[/QUOTE]
Christian 'culture' still denies scientific proof refuting its claims, still preaches that one should obey blindly and not question, and rejects philosophies and viewpoints that don't fit its doctrine. I think the Islamic culture 'evolved' far, far more quickly - before the west ruined it.
I'm referring to the institution here and not individuals.
I'm looking forward to the time when they realise that they will be never be able to defeat the USA or Britain or anyone else. They are all idiots, and all they can hope to do is provoke retalitation.
[QUOTE=archangel125;29661497]My theory is that the Christian culture - western nations - destroyed the Islamic one intentionally, through countless wars and economic ploys.
[/QUOTE]
Maybe because a large amount of those advances coincidentally came around as they were conquering previously Roman/Byzantine/Indian territories?
Newest Member is Christian, lol.
[editline]6th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;29661622]Maybe because a large amount of those advances coincidentally came around as they were conquering previously Roman/Byzantine/Indian territories?[/QUOTE]
Advances in science and technology?
[QUOTE=archangel125;29661553]Christian 'culture' still denies scientific proof refuting its claims, still preaches that one should obey blindly and not question, and rejects philosophies and viewpoints that don't fit its doctrine. I think the Islamic culture 'evolved' far, far more quickly - before the west ruined it.[/QUOTE]
I dislike nearly all organised religion, but for now the christians are ahead in my book: there not killing thousands every day, in the name of god.
[QUOTE='[sluggo];29661639']I dislike nearly all organised religion, but for now the christians are ahead in my book: there not killing thousands every day, in the name of god.[/QUOTE]
Islamists aren't killing thousands every day in the name of god either. That's a ridiculously exaggerated number.
Want to see true radical christians?
Look at the myraid African countries where atrocities are committed in the name of Jesus.
[QUOTE=smurfy;29661531][url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/london-bombings-the-truth-emerges-502660.html]An investigation into the four suicide bombers from the first attacks and the people alleged to be behind the July 21 plot has found no evidence of any al-Qa'ida "mastermind" or senior organiser.[/url][/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/4313740/Al-Qaeda-commander-linked-to-2005-London-bombings-led-attacks-on-Nato-convoys.html[/url]
[QUOTE=TheTalon;29661018]They get to gather around inside of London and chant that the USA will pay for killing the guy responsible for thousands and thousands and thousands of deaths? Would someone explain to me why we don't just drop a Hellfire on that little crowd?[/QUOTE]
What a waste of Hellfire, these things are needed against tanks.
Use napalm.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;29661018]They get to gather around inside of London and chant that the USA will pay for killing the guy responsible for thousands and thousands and thousands of deaths? Would someone explain to me why we don't just drop a Hellfire on that little crowd?[/QUOTE]
Because we're not as retarded as you are.
Want to hold a mass murderer responsible?
Put Bush in front of an international court to answer for his crimes.
[QUOTE=LinuX;29661136]Aren't they into Cyber-Terrorism now?
What if they leak everyone's password for Gmail, Facebook, and other sites :ohdear:[/QUOTE]
Now if that happened on facebook, it would be fun to watch.
[editline]6th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=archangel125;29661712]Because we're not as retarded as you are.
Want to hold a mass murderer responsible?
Put Bush in front of an international court to answer for his crimes.[/QUOTE]
You Can kill terrorists but not waterboard them? I've always hated it when people say that.
[QUOTE=smurfy;29660955]Yeah good luck with that you haven't managed to pull off an attack in ten years lol[/QUOTE]
they didnt need to. with us on [i]their sand[/i] they can target us so much easier.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;29661688]What a waste of Hellfire, these things are needed against tanks.
Use napalm.[/QUOTE]
I've always loved thermite, slow but effective.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;29661688]What a waste of Hellfire, these things are needed against tanks.
Use napalm.[/QUOTE]
Oh hey guys, let's kill all these people because they're expressing their dislike for the United States.
Funny that you shitheads can be so hypocritical after you all witnessed the celebrations in the streets after Bin Laden's death.
Those protesters haven't hurt anyone yet. When someone does, blow him away. Until then, they're protected by law.
[QUOTE=archangel125;29661918]Oh hey guys, let's kill all these people because they're expressing their dislike for the United States.
Funny that you shitheads can be so hypocritical after you all witnessed the celebrations in the streets after Bin Laden's death.
Those protesters haven't hurt anyone yet. When someone does, blow him away. Until then, they're protected by law.[/QUOTE]
Thank you.
"uk doesn't have freedom of speech laws" "bomb people standing outside the US embassy in london"
The US are generally all for dropping ordnance on UK forces, why not citizens as well eh?
[QUOTE=archangel125;29661918]Oh hey guys, let's kill all these people because they're expressing their dislike for the United States.
Funny that you shitheads can be so hypocritical after you all witnessed the celebrations in the streets after Bin Laden's death.
Those protesters haven't hurt anyone yet. When someone does, blow him away. Until then, they're protected by law.[/QUOTE]
You would make a good "blind jail supervisor" who doesn't do anything about prisoners being about to kill eachother until it actually happens and it starts to be his problem.
I don't feel anyhow kindered towards USA, and I think that Osama should have been captured, not killed, but these people are passing the borders of what's acceptable. As far as I know, death threats are illegal on their own.
[editline]7th May 2011[/editline]
Pay for what exactly, again? For killing a single man, who murdered thousands through his ploys. Thousands, including unarmed, unconcerned and unsuspecting civvies. And they want a whole nation, pay a death of such a guy. How can anybody claim this is remotely reasonable?
[QUOTE=TheTalon;29661018]They get to gather around inside of London and chant that the USA will pay for killing the guy responsible for thousands and thousands and thousands of deaths? Would someone explain to me why we don't just drop a Hellfire on that little crowd?[/QUOTE]
uhh because they have freedom of speech and are human beings
[editline]6th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;29662710]
Pay for what exactly, again? For killing a single man, who murdered thousands through his ploys. Thousands, including unarmed, unconcerned and unsuspecting civvies. And they want a whole nation, pay a death of such a guy. How can anybody claim this is remotely reasonable?[/QUOTE]
it doesn't matter how wrong their opinion is it still isn't ok to kill them you dummy
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29662745]uhh because they have freedom of speech and are human beings[/QUOTE]
Write a death threat to your PM and sign it, please. Then try to justify your right of freedom of speech.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;29662770]Write a death threat to your PM and sign it, please. Then try to justify your right of freedom of speech.[/QUOTE]
if someone makes a death threat by all means prosecute that specific individual under the full extent of the law, but that isn't what we're talking about
we're talking about you wanting to kill people for a non-violent protest
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29662745]uhh because they have freedom of speech and are human beings
[editline]6th May 2011[/editline]
it doesn't matter how wrong their opinion is it still isn't ok to kill them you dummy[/QUOTE]
Of course I am exaggerating. How could one even reasonably use napalm in middle of capital city, that makes no sense whatsoever. Arrest them all and throw them into a slammer till they realize they are not being acceptable on any level.
I loved osama like sun raise...
EVIL WEST YOU WILL SUFFAR!!
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;29662808]Of course I am exaggerating. How could one even reasonably use napalm in middle of capital city, that makes no sense whatsoever. Arrest them all and throw them into a slammer till they realize they are not being acceptable on any level.[/QUOTE]
them using their freedom of speech in a non-violent manner is acceptable though, so...
[QUOTE=Scar;29662818]I loved osama like sun raise...
EVIL WEST YOU WILL* SUFFAR!![/QUOTE]
* may or may not be true
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29662825]them using their freedom of speech in a non-violent manner is acceptable though, so...[/QUOTE]
They are calling for suffering of generally innocent people in revenge for death of a murderer.
That's not acceptable.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;29662865]They are calling for suffering of generally innocent people[/QUOTE]
you're sorta doing the same thing right now aren't you though. someone who has a bad opinion but isn't harming anyone is most definitely an innocent person
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;29662865]That's not acceptable.[/QUOTE]
it is morally distasteful but they are not harming anyone or violating the rights of anyone else
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29662903]you're sorta doing the same thing right now aren't you though
it is morally distasteful but they are not harming anyone or violating the rights of anyone else[/QUOTE]
I am telling you, try writing a death threat to your president/ minister/ anybody, and see how your law system is going to deal with it.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;29662710]You would make a good "blind jail supervisor" who doesn't do anything about prisoners being about to kill eachother until it actually happens and it starts to be his problem.
I don't feel anyhow kindered towards USA, and I think that Osama should have been captured, not killed, but these people are passing the borders of what's acceptable. As far as I know, death threats are illegal on their own.
[editline]7th May 2011[/editline]
Pay for what exactly, again? For killing a single man, who murdered thousands through his ploys. Thousands, including unarmed, unconcerned and unsuspecting civvies. And they want a whole nation, pay a death of such a guy. How can anybody claim this is remotely reasonable?[/QUOTE]
I'll just go ahead and sentence you to a life behind bars, then, because you might commit a crime at some point during your life.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;29662923]I am telling you, try writing a death threat to your president/ minister/ anybody, and see how your law system is going to deal with it.[/QUOTE]
generalized protesting isn't comparable to a direct death threat. for the millionth (or maybe second) time, if someone makes a legitimate death threat then persecute them, but since these people haven't been persecuted, it's pretty clear that the state doesn't consider what they're doing as "death threats"
[QUOTE=archangel125;29662924]I'll just go ahead and sentence you to a life behind bars, then, because you might commit a crime at some point during your life.[/QUOTE]
If I threatened to do such crime in serious and accountable manner, then you have all rights to assume I am potentially dangerous and malicious, and apply exactly these measures and penalties set for this by law.
[editline]7th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29662949]generalized protesting isn't comparable to a direct death threat.[/QUOTE]
It is comparable. The point is to instill fear, to terrorize. Purely malicious intent.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
