• Man Arrested for Having Back Turned on Hillary Clinton
    98 replies, posted
Hillary can go back to sucking Bill Clinton's dick.
[QUOTE=ProffesorAssHat;28181106]Hillary can go back to sucking Bill Clinton's dick.[/QUOTE] hillary didn't even do anything, she was in the middle of a speech when it happened. if you want someone to be mad at, be mad at her security detail
[QUOTE=Treybuchet;28180194]He did it with Rumsfeld too, notably. He's playing chicken with politicians, to see how far he can push them I actually kind of dislike him, to a degree[/QUOTE] doesn't matter how much of a dick he is, that is not the point, he didn't do anything to cause anyone harm, so in a "free country" arresting him is unnacceptable
[QUOTE=ProffesorAssHat;28181106]Hillary can go back to sucking Bill Clinton's dick.[/QUOTE] She would if it weren't already occupied. :v:
[QUOTE=bli_191;28181206]doesn't matter how much of a dick he is, that is not the point, he didn't do anything to cause anyone harm, so in a "free country" arresting him is unnacceptable[/QUOTE] free country does not mean you can do whatever you want. doing something which could be construed as threatening in a location where tensions about security are incredibly high does not really fall under the purview of the term "free country", just like how you aren't allowed to act suspicious at an airport
Stay classy Hilary. Stay classy...
[QUOTE=Richard Simmons;28181681]Stay classy Hilary. Stay classy...[/QUOTE] yes, i'm sure hillary stopped her speech and pointed at the man and shouted "Arrest that man!"
Home of the [del]free[/del]! and the home of the brave! More like home of the unfree
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;28179988]There has to be more to this then meets the eye.[/QUOTE] [img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3145/2636813869_dbbd557f38.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=The Spie;28181781] More like home of the unfree[/QUOTE] nice 1
[QUOTE=Mingebox;28181808]nice 1[/QUOTE] thanks
reposting for the top of the second page in the hope that it gets through: hillary didn't order the man to be taken out unless she did so telepathically or via morse-code-blinking
[QUOTE=OpethRockr55;28181214]She would if it weren't already occupied. :v:[/QUOTE] No she wouldn't, that's what Monica Lewinskys are for
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;28181446]free country does not mean you can do whatever you want. doing something which could be construed as threatening in a location where tensions about security are incredibly high does not really fall under the purview of the term "free country", just like how you aren't allowed to act suspicious at an airport[/QUOTE] I can’t believe I’m actually disagreeing with you but no, this is not like acting suspicious at an airport [B]at all[/B]. This man has a history of silently protesting public figures by simply turning his back during the speech. He posed no security risk whatsoever.
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;28181446]free country does not mean you can do whatever you want. doing something which could be construed as threatening in a location where tensions about security are incredibly high does not really fall under the purview of the term "free country", just like how you aren't allowed to act suspicious at an airport[/QUOTE] turning his back was threatening? fuck call in th SWAT, this guy isn't looking at me anyway, as soon as you start telling people what they can and can't do when they are not harming anyone, you lose the right to call youself a free country
[QUOTE=Treybuchet;28180194]He did it with Rumsfeld too, notably. He's playing chicken with politicians, to see how far he can push them I actually kind of dislike him, to a degree[/QUOTE] Well if he’s doing it to public figures who he strongly disagrees with, then good for him. He’s not even heckling.
[QUOTE=Starpluck;28181884]I can’t believe I’m actually disagreeing with you but no, this is not like acting suspicious at an airport. This man has a history of silently protesting public figures by simple, walking out during a speech. He posed no security risk whatsoever.[/QUOTE] This. And from what it looked like, it was almost like a.. like a conference room. He was most likely standing in the way of a camera or some shit. I'm not really sure but no one else seemed to care about what he was doing until they got him. This is upsetting. I wish people in my country would stop doing dumb shit. Also, Clinton should apologize for what happened. I'd love to see that.
-snip-
While I strongly disagree with how this man was handled by security personnel, I think we have to agree that Clinton wasn't personally responsible for the way he was treated. I'm not sure how many people here have ever given a speech, but it's really hard to pay attention to any one thing that's happening in the audience. Clinton didn't say anything when the guy was drug out because she probably didn't even notice him and just assumed that he was causing trouble and that security was going to handle it. So the blame and the wrong lies with the security and police, not the politician. It's not like Clinton ordered this man to be beaten.
So i guess the moral of the story here is if you want to criticize a politician you can't do it to their face because, well, [b]9/11[/b], it's best to take your bickering to some sort of internet forum where nothing matters
[QUOTE=Starpluck;28181942]If it was simply a 'security risk' why don’t we arrest the Israeli, American, British, French and German U.N. ambassador for walking out on Ahamadinejad speeches? (who's actually more prone to an assassination attempt)[/QUOTE] Standing up in front of a public speaker is different than walking out of the room.
[QUOTE=5killer;28182041]Standing up in front of a public speaker is different than walking out of the room.[/QUOTE] ah my bad. couldn't watch the video and I misread the article as him leaving
Wow, they way he was handled was just not right at all, bruised and bloody? That is down right unnecessary.
I hate America now. So fucking much.
Was that secret service security guys? If they are, I can't blame Hillary (altough I don't like her). These guys as far as I know are pretty much independent from people whom they are protecting. But I honestly prefer to see how this guy is arrested, but Hillary is also got her face on the floor under the bodies of USSS guys who are protecting her, instead of standing there with disgusting, and also stupid smirk on her face. That could be awesome.
[QUOTE=Bryanrocks0;28180780]I'm glad that you're getting pissed over something trivial like a news story. Change out of your diapers and put on your big boy pants, then we'll talk.[/QUOTE] you have a diaper fetish haha
[QUOTE=Xokiller65;28182434]Wow, they way he was handled was just not right at all, bruised and bloody? That is down right unnecessary.[/QUOTE] He could've resisted, and they had to use force to stop him. I still don't agree with what they did, but I am quite sure they didn't just start randomly beating on him. (even though that could be quite possible)
The hypocrisy of America is priceless.
And yet again facepunch members fall for media sensationalism.
[img]http://rense.com/1.imagesH/change4th_dees.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.ruhrbarone.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/pranger.jpg[/img] [B]USA 2011[/B]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.