Guy's girlfriend cheated on him, wants to get back together, he replies with memes.
215 replies, posted
[QUOTE=gudman;45028064]Fucking read what I wrote, how about that? I just agreed with you in that very thing. Posting that shit for expressed purpose of embarrasing the girl is a dick move and bullying allright. I never even said that's okay.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=gudman;45027986]You can't call it bullying when "victim" initiates the conversation "bully" doesn't want to have.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=supersnail11;45028053]Which is why he made a fake conversation and put it on twitter to get famous.[/QUOTE]
We don't know if it's fake. May be, may be not.
Yeah you refuse to read the quotes, are you? I never said anything about [b]posting[/b] stuff for all to see, I was only speaking about the conversation itself. Yeah I probably misunderstood what he meant and was talking to the void instead of real arguments, that I don't deny either.
[QUOTE=Kagu;45028069]Are you serious right now?
She cheated on the guy, and didn't even directly apologize.
Can she not control herself because she's a teenager?
It wasn't the guy's fault he made her cheat on him?
After all, he was the "nicest" guy she's ever met.[/QUOTE]
Again, this is fake. But she's not being a dick to the guy while texting him, so why is he being a dick to her?
[editline]7th June 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=gudman;45028074]We don't know if it's fake. May be, may be not.[/QUOTE]
Fake until proven otherwise.
[QUOTE=supersnail11;45028066]Again, this is fake. This conversation did not happen. But even if it did, and she did try to get him back through texting, does that really give you a license to be a dick?[/QUOTE]
I dunno', does being a woman give you a free exemption from consequences?
He went too far at the end, but up until the end of the texts, his anger was justified.
[editline]7th June 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=supersnail11;45028082]
Fake until proven otherwise.[/QUOTE]
Burden of proof falls on the person making the claim.
[QUOTE=Kagu;45028088]I dunno', does being a woman give you a free exemption from consequences?
He went too far at the end, but up until the end of the texts, his anger was justified.[/QUOTE]
Does being angry give you a license to be a dick? Did I ever say she's exempt from consequences?
[editline]7th June 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Kagu;45028088]Burden of proof falls on the person making the claim.[/QUOTE]
He's making the claim, and he hasn't backed it up. If I doubt his claim, I'm not the one who has to prove it.
[QUOTE=gudman;45028064]Fucking read what I wrote, how about that? I just agreed with you in that very thing. Posting that shit for expressed purpose of embarrasing the girl is a dick move and bullying allright. I never even said that's okay.[/QUOTE]
You said
[QUOTE=gudman;45027986]You can't call it bullying when "victim" initiates the conversation "bully" doesn't want to have.[/QUOTE]
and I said, that and apparently you agree that
[QUOTE=Thlis;45028045]Posting a private conversation in order to harass or embarrass another individual is bullying.
[/QUOTE]
So the situation is bullying.
[QUOTE=supersnail11;45028082]
Fake until proven otherwise.[/QUOTE]
Oh that's new, why is that? How do you even expect to get proof that it's not fake?
[QUOTE=gudman;45028105]Oh that's new, why is that? How do you even expect to get proof that it's not fake?[/QUOTE]
Burden of proof. He's making a claim, and he hasn't backed it up. So it's assumed false until proven otherwise.
[QUOTE=Thlis;45028104]You said
and I said, that and apparently you agree that
So the situation is bullying.[/QUOTE]
Situation itself is bullying. You see there's a word "conversation", right? Conversation happened in private, right? And there was no bullying? And then he posted it. Which the point where he became a massive dick and a bully. Do we reach an understanding?
[QUOTE=supersnail11;45028044]First, this is obviously fake, so the woman doesn't exist.
Second, she definitely does. She doesn't literally say "I am sorry, please forgive me," but she is definitely begging him to take her back.[/QUOTE]
First it doesn't matter if they don't exist that wasn't the point, i was replying to you specifically
Second begging for someone back isn't apologizing, nowhere within that text does she even admit she was wrong
[QUOTE=supersnail11;45028097]Does being angry give you a license to be a dick? Did I ever say she's exempt from consequences?[/QUOTE]
Of course being angry gives you a license to act/be a dick, how else would you vent your anger?
Let it out, not keep it in.
He was at least not dumb enough to let it out on someone else, but the person who made him act that way in the first place.
The way you're attacking the guy makes me believe you think the girl isn't at fault.
[QUOTE=supersnail11;45028097][editline]7th June 2014[/editline]
He's making the claim, and he hasn't backed it up. If I doubt his claim, I'm not the one who has to prove it.[/QUOTE]
Bad reading on my part then.
Fake or not, who even gives a fuck like why/how is this even news worthy
[QUOTE=supersnail11;45028110]Burden of proof. He's making a claim, and he hasn't backed it up. So it's assumed false until proven otherwise.[/QUOTE]
Um, how, again? He presented the screencaps. What reasons do you have to doubt them, really? I'm not hell-bent on defending the authenticity of those, but you're just being a bit silly here, don't you think?
[QUOTE=gudman;45028118] Do we reach an understanding?[/QUOTE]
Yeah, that you have been arguing about something completely pointless.
Why are you getting so hung up "But he wasn't bullying before posting it to twitter". That is completely irrelevant to the hypothetical situation.
[QUOTE=Killer900;45028125]Fake or not, who even gives a fuck like why/how is this even news worthy[/QUOTE]
It's not even the fact that it's newsworthy on why people are discussing this.
It's the arbitrary social line where "should we blame the guy or the girl?"
[QUOTE=Kagu;45028123]Of course being angry gives you a license to act/be a dick, how else would you vent your anger?
Let it out, not keep it in.
He was at least not dumb enough to let it out on someone else, but the person who made him act that way in the first place.
The way you're attacking the guy makes me believe you think the girl isn't at fault.[/QUOTE]
Being angry does not give you a license to be a dick. You're not supposed to vent your anger. It's called being mature.
And both of them are at fault. She's at fault for cheating on him, and he's at fault for being a dick to her and posting it on twitter.
[editline]7th June 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=gudman;45028141]Um, how, again? He presented the screencaps. What reasons do you have to doubt them, really? I'm not hell-bent on defending the authenticity of those, but you're just being a bit silly here, don't you think?[/QUOTE]
Because there's no proof?
[QUOTE=Kagu;45028146]It's not even the fact that it's newsworthy on why people are discussing this.
It's the arbitrary social line where "should we blame the guy or the girl?"[/QUOTE]I guess, I just find it silly how much publicity this kid is getting over nothing other than a breakup using pictures instead of text. Like the kid said though, any sort of publicity is good publicity in his eyes, even if faked.
[QUOTE=gudman;45028141]Um, how, again? He presented the screencaps. What reasons do you have to doubt them, really? I'm not hell-bent on defending the authenticity of those, but you're just being a bit silly here, don't you think?[/QUOTE]Do you realize how easy it is to fake iPhone/Android conversations? There's websites out there dedicated to that shit, that or it could have been a friend playing the role of his gf, screencaps mean nothing.
[QUOTE=supersnail11;45027600]Maybe she w as worried that the guy thought she cheated because she was mad at him? Maybe she made a mistake because she's a teenager and that's what young people do?[/QUOTE]
I'm just trying to understand how this can be used as an excuse for the girl, but not the guy.
But whatever, he already fucked himself over by reaching for publicity.
That still doesn't make the girl automatically forgiven.
I guess they
Broke up
[QUOTE=Thlis;45028144]Yeah, that you have been arguing about something completely pointless.
Why are you getting so hung up "But he wasn't bullying before posting it to twitter". That is completely irrelevant to the hypothetical situation.[/QUOTE]
Because I misunderstood your post and was arguing from that point on. Which was incorrect.
[QUOTE=Kagu;45028164]I'm just trying to understand how this can be used as an excuse for the girl, but not the guy.
But whatever, he already fucked himself over by reaching for publicity.
That still doesn't make the girl automatically forgiven.[/QUOTE]
I didn't say it's not an excuse for him. But that doesn't mean he's justified in what he did, nor is she justified in what she did. I just mean that not everyone who cheats on their significant others are evil/bitches/sluts/etc.
[QUOTE=gudman;45028141]Um, how, again? He presented the screencaps. What reasons do you have to doubt them, really? I'm not hell-bent on defending the authenticity of those, but you're just being a bit silly here, don't you think?[/QUOTE]
Screencaps of a text chat that could've easily been made up?
So if he said that he slept with half of America, would you believe him just because he said it?
[QUOTE=supersnail11;45028188]I didn't say it's not an excuse for him. But that doesn't mean he's justified in what he did, nor is she justified in what she did. I just mean that not everyone who cheats on their significant others are evil/bitches/sluts/etc.[/QUOTE]
Well I misunderstood your motive then, sorry.
[QUOTE=Killer900;45028160]
Do you realize how easy it is to fake iPhone/Android conversations? There's websites out there dedicated to that shit, that or it could have been a friend playing the role of his gf, screencaps mean nothing.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CWalkthroughs;45028189]Screencaps of a text chat that could've easily been made up?
So if he said that he slept with half of America, would you believe him just because he said it?[/QUOTE]
They're no argument against proof to the contrary, yes. But on their own, there's literally no reason to doubt those. It's not like there's something all that unlikely. Pretty ordinary shit.
And honestly, there's no reason to operate from that point of view, because if we just assume those to be fake then there's nothing at all to talk about. Which just defeats the purpose. A guy made up some shit, got popular. That's it.
[QUOTE=gudman;45028216]They're no argument against proof to the contrary, yes. But on their own, there's literally no reason to doubt those.
And honestly, there's no reason to operate from that point of view, because if we just assume those to be fake then there's nothing at all to talk about. Which just defeats the purpose. A guy made up some shit, got popular. That's it.[/QUOTE]
The guy had actually cheated on her five times before this, and murdered several of her family members. That's why she cheated on him. There's no reason to doubt that, so why should you?
[QUOTE=gudman;45028216]They're no argument against proof to the contrary, yes. But on their own, there's literally no reason to doubt those.
And honestly, there's no reason to operate from that point of view, because if we just assume those to be fake then there's nothing at all to talk about. Which just defeats the purpose. A guy made up some shit, got popular. That's it.[/QUOTE]
No reason to doubt? With just a text chat screencap that could've been faked, there's no reason to agree either.
[QUOTE=gudman;45028216]They're no argument against proof to the contrary, yes. But on their own, there's literally no reason to doubt those. It's not like there's something all that unlikely. Pretty ordinary shit.
[B]
And honestly, there's no reason to operate from that point of view, because if we just assume those to be fake then there's nothing at all to talk about. Which just defeats the purpose.[/B] A guy made up some shit, got popular. That's it.[/QUOTE]That's the entire point, this shouldn't even be a news story. Why should a liar get publicity like this, it's deceit.
[QUOTE=Killer900;45028241]Why should a liar get publicity like this[/QUOTE]
Preferably for a boot up the ass. And CNN for puting this shit on air.
If you thought youtube comments were rancid.
[url]https://twitter.com/KaneZipperman/status/473962089006907392/photo/1[/url]
Moral of the story: Don't cheat.
[QUOTE=CWalkthroughs;45028232]No reason to doubt? With just a text chat screencap that could've been faked, there's no reason to agree either.[/QUOTE]
What the fuck, do I speak some alien language today or something? Yeah those can very well be faked. They're even likely to be fake. For obvious reason - to get popular. But this thread exists. So we talk about shit here, under the assumption that it can be true. Especially since the topic is not some otherwordly shit no one can actually believe took place. If it's fake, it renders everything pointless, hence why no one talks about it being fake but you guys.
[editline]7th June 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Killer900;45028241]That's the entire point, this shouldn't even be a news story. Why should a liar get publicity like this, it's deceit.[/QUOTE]
Well yeah, but we had some fun having a conversation in this thread. Yeah it's pointless and stupid. But it exists. That's what forums are for.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.