• Panel clears "Climategate" scientists of all wrongdoing
    103 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Swilly;23207188]But technically, if the jet stream in the Atlantic, if its cooled by the ice melting in the north could lead to an even more dramatic cooling.[/QUOTE] That's why we call it Climate Change, not Global Warming. The planet warms initially, but then the melting ice caps causes the salt water/fresh water currents to mess up, causing some areas to cool down.
Wasn't there emails between the head scientists with them talking about all the data they bullshited? I could be wrong, but they resigned right after those came out.
[QUOTE=TheChantzGuy;23208265]Wasn't there emails between the head scientists with them talking about all the data they bullshited? I could be wrong, but they resigned right after those came out.[/QUOTE] that's what the article in the OP is about, the article is saying that there wasn't any "bullshitting", that it was all blown out of proportion. Jesus christ man, read
[QUOTE=Doom14;23187535]I don't mind when people think either way on Global Warming [I](Oops, Climate Change)[/I]. What I do mind, is people who think some article, scientist or peer review proves it in the fullest. People lie, statistics get strewn about, pretty graphs are drawn up to skew an issue, and peer reviews are dolled out on dollar bills. Stop going "[B]OMG GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL/NOT REAL[/B]", it'd be better to argue what's actually in the efforts going forth to thwart it (Real or not). Global Warming or not, I have no problem with helping the environment, as long as my hard-earned cash isn't going towards needless bullshit or directly into the pockets of people who'll do nothing with it. I'll gladly put forth a little of my own money to help clean up my neighborhood, but I'm not going to pull out even a penny for something as asinine as a "[I]Green Golf-Cart[/I]".[/QUOTE] i love you.
[QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;23194450] come on, these people are scientists[/QUOTE] Did you know you can just BUY lab coats?:lsd: [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Warned you" - TH89))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Ridge;23210262]Did you know you can just BUY lab coats?:lsd:[/QUOTE] did you know you can just quote dumb web comics?
[QUOTE=Ridge;23210262]Did you know you can just BUY lab coats?:lsd:[/QUOTE] you had all of your points debunked one by one
[QUOTE=Ridge;23210262]Did you know you can just BUY lab coats?[/QUOTE] Yeah, but you can't buy a climatologist job at a respected university. [editline]04:54PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Ridge;23210262] [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Warned you" - TH89))[/highlight][/QUOTE] [IMG]http://imgur.com/76TDS.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=TheChantzGuy;23208265]Wasn't there emails between the head scientists with them talking about all the data they bullshited? I could be wrong, but they resigned right after those came out.[/QUOTE] There were emails that didn't say anything about climate change being bullshit, but conservatives hate reality , so they pretended it said something else.
[QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;23205829]someone is going to come into this thread and post "it's a natural cycle" again without reading a single post and i'm just going to kill myself[/QUOTE] it's a natural cycle [editline]12:07PM[/editline] it's cyclical in nature
[QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;23205829]someone is going to come into this thread and post "it's a natural cycle" again without reading a single post and i'm just going to kill myself[/QUOTE] It's a natural cycle: [IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/p2000b0c8g38001.jpg[/IMG] [QUOTE]Paleo evidence from the last few ice ages provides a rich picture of the climate variability on multidecadal to millennial timescales, which is fundamentally driven by internal dynamics of the environment subject to variability in the total solar irradiance and volcanic aerosols. [B]It shows how the climate is capable of behaving in the absence of anthropogenic forcing.[/B] We must look on longer timescales to understand how climate can respond to more substantial natural forcings. Paleo data indicate that feedbacks in the polar regions have been responsible for enormous environmental change owing to alterations in the Earth’s atmospheric composition and incoming solar distribution, the buildup of ice sheets, and continental drift (Crowley and North, 1996). [URL="http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11013&page=38#p2000b0c89960038001"]Figure 3.7[/URL] showsthe history of global temperatures for the past 80 million years. Major puzzles remain regarding why glaciations were intermittent and what caused major warmings and coolings on top of the very long global cooling of the past. [/QUOTE] [url=http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11013]Source[/url]
wow you're persistent
[QUOTE=Lambeth;23232994]wow you're persistent[/QUOTE] Of course... I tend to stay on the line of persistence and just plain annoying.
[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;23232080]It's a natural cycle: [IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/p2000b0c8g38001.jpg[/IMG] [url=http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11013]Source[/url][/QUOTE] have you heard of the Alberta tar sands? Can you explain how that doesn't affect the climate?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.