Protesters struggle to stay awake on first night of sleeping ban - Polidicks

[QUOTE=RichyZ;34485795]fuck them for exercising a constitutional right[/QUOTE] So they are legally allowed to block ports, loiter, trespass and vandalize? Damn, what memo did I miss?

[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;34479891]Why don't they split into two halves, having each spending 12 hours on the spot and the rest somewhere else, sleeping and stuff, and then always swap?[/QUOTE] Because that's an idea that implies that they're all an organized and disciplined organization that would willingly split with no arguments

[QUOTE=faze;34485861]So they are legally allowed to block ports, loiter, trespass and vandalize? Damn, what memo did I miss?[/QUOTE] no, but legality is not the be all and end all of moral acceptability. \/\/\/\/\/ okay i'll rephrase that!! it doesn't matter what the constitution says, jabronie. i literally think it's okay to break certain laws in the scope of a greater struggle and if you disagree that's not surprising.

[QUOTE=notxmania;34485983]no, but legality is not the be all and end all of moral acceptability.[/QUOTE] What? Morals are not constitutionally backed in the context you speak of. You're off topic.

[QUOTE=faze;34485861]So they are legally allowed to block ports, loiter, trespass and vandalize? Damn, what memo did I miss?[/QUOTE] do you use this rational for anything? even in countries where not wearing a veil is illegal?

You know what the OWS need. A Pink :v: Let them hammer us together!

[QUOTE=faze;34485861]So they are legally allowed to block ports, loiter, trespass and vandalize? Damn, what memo did I miss?[/QUOTE] Most of history's effective protests utilized civil disobedience in some way or another I'm not even counting the ones that just turned into a full-blown riot to get results

[QUOTE=notxmania;34485983]no, but legality is not the be all and end all of moral acceptability. \/\/\/\/\/ okay i'll rephrase that!! it doesn't matter what the constitution says, jabronie. i literally think it's okay to break certain laws in the scope of a greater struggle and if you disagree that's not surprising.[/QUOTE] Define which laws...

[QUOTE=Zeke129;34488772]Most of history's effective protests utilized civil disobedience in some way or another I'm not even counting the ones that just turned into a full-blown riot to get results[/QUOTE] Does that make them right? No, it doesn't. [QUOTE=thisispain;34488348]do you use this rational for anything? even in countries where not wearing a veil is illegal?[/QUOTE] What are you even on about?

[QUOTE=faze;34492648]Does that make them right? No, it doesn't. What are you even on about?[/QUOTE] i'm saying if legality is such an issue for you, you'd have to be logically against protests of forced veil-wearing.

How can they actually even get away with this, sleep is a basic need of survival, without you will die. It would be like them saying were banning the use of drinking water here.

[QUOTE=Rich209;34492752]How can they actually even get away with this, sleep is a basic need of survival, without you will die. It would be like them saying were banning the use of drinking water here.[/QUOTE] They are not forcing them to stay there. If you are in a place that has banned the use of drinking water you leave and go to another place, which is what they are trying to do here.

[QUOTE=faze;34492648]Does that make them right? No, it doesn't.[/QUOTE] I suppose you're opposed to women's suffrage, civil rights and the Arab Spring revolts too?

[QUOTE=faze;34479195]Kind of hard to support a group of people that loiter, trespass and vandalize for no real reason.[/QUOTE] loiter? You do know protesting typically includes standing physically in one area? [editline]1st February 2012[/editline] Faze is horribly out of touch with reality.