Ron Paul Booed by Insane Debate Audience for Endorsing the Golden Rule - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Combine_dumb;34254194]Paul may be insane but he's still the most sensible candidate on the GOP side.[/QUOTE] Now that Huntsman has left the building anyway

[QUOTE=Lambeth;34254364]Now that Huntsman has left the building anyway[/QUOTE] Huntsman didn't have a chance of making it anyways. Ron Paul, sadly, does.

[QUOTE=BrainDeath;34254363]GOD DAMN IT RON PAUL STOP BEING RIGHT YOU'RE AN ARSEHOLE I DON'T [B]WANT[/B] TO LIKE YOU[/QUOTE] don't worry, he's wrong on pretty much everything else [editline]17th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Fables;34254401]Huntsman didn't have a chance of making it anyways. Ron Paul, sadly, does.[/QUOTE] no he doesn't

[QUOTE=Lazor;34254407]no he doesn't[/QUOTE] Yes he does. It's between him and Romney, and the Republicans dislike both of them. Romney is disliked mostly because of that whole universal healthcare fiasco when he was the governor of New Hampshire (plus, he's a Mormon, which most of the Christian Republicans can't stand) and Paul because he strays away from a lot of popular Republican ideals. I guess it's just a matter of who they dislike the least, and that could very well be Paul.

Romeny is going to win. the voters for other candidates are not going to fucking flock to Ron Paul when they drop out

Even better, they booed when they said Romney's dad was Mexican also this: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuXQ0XapnNM[/media] Guy was ignoring paul and she flipped on on her co-host when she started getting complaints from her live stream

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;34254115]And that 9/11 was done by the CIA, and that homosexuals are a government plot to reduce population, the list goes on and on, how has this man not been institutionalized? Then on top of that there's the newsletters which he did acknowledge and support originally.[/QUOTE] Maybe because it's not him that's insane, but rather you, for instantly believing, without all the facts, everything biased media outlets and "blogs" throw in your face? The hell's so "dumb" about this statement? Ron Paul has NEVER said anything even remotely suggesting that the CIA is behind 9/11, those claims came from an ex-staffer: [url]http://rightwingnews.com/election-2012/statement-from-fmr-ron-paul-staffer-on-newsletters-anti-semitism/[/url] The newsletter mess was blown completely out of proportion by a misleading article when it first came out in the '90s.

[url]http://video.foxnews.com/v/1395907594001/twitter-followers-rate-candidates-debate-answers[/url] i think he has a chance

[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34254528]Maybe because it's not him that's insane, but rather you, for believing anything biased media throws in your face?[/QUOTE] wow, i was just browsing through a text file with this exact sentence in it, if anyone is interested, here's the name: ronpaulsupportertalkingpoints.txt [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Shitposting" - Starpluck))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=assholev2;34254479]Even better, they booed when they said Romney's dad was Mexican also this: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuXQ0XapnNM[/media] Guy was ignoring paul and she flipped on on her co-host when she started getting complaints from her live stream[/QUOTE] damn you

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;34254115]And that 9/11 was done by the CIA, and that homosexuals are a government plot to reduce population, the list goes on and on, how has this man not been institutionalized? Then on top of that there's the newsletters which he did acknowledge and support originally.[/QUOTE] I've heard about the racist newsletters, but could I grab a source for the rest of that? That sounds incredibly excessive, even for Paul.

[QUOTE=beanhead;34254529][url]http://video.foxnews.com/v/1395907594001/twitter-followers-rate-candidates-debate-answers[/url] i think he has a chance[/QUOTE] the 538 says that Romeny is basically guaranteed the nomination. i think i'll trust one of the most accurate statistical analyses of elections over a twitter survey

[QUOTE=Fhenexx;34254551]I've heard about the racist newsletters, but could I grab a source for the rest of that? That sounds incredibly excessive, even for Paul.[/QUOTE] Pretty sure TH89 posted a thread on it a couple weeks ago.

[QUOTE=Lazor;34254540]wow, i was just browsing through a text file with this exact sentence in it, if anyone is interested, here's the name: ronpaulsupportertalkingpoints.txt[/QUOTE] damn you to my poor automerge

[QUOTE=Fhenexx;34254551]I've heard about the racist newsletters, but could I grab a source for the rest of that? That sounds incredibly excessive, even for Paul.[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1150796?[/url] Oh wait, did you mean the conspiracy theories? [editline]17th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Lazor;34254540]wow, i was just browsing through a text file with this exact sentence in it, if anyone is interested, here's the name: ronpaulsupportertalkingpoints.txt[/QUOTE] Well he is the master of question dodging. [editline]17th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34254528]Maybe because it's not him that's insane, but rather you, for instantly believing, without all the facts, everything biased media outlets and "blogs" throw in your face?[/QUOTE] Do you really want me to get into this again?

[QUOTE=Lazor;34254540]wow, i was just browsing through a text file with this exact sentence in it, if anyone is interested, here's the name: ronpaulsupportertalkingpoints.txt[/QUOTE] someonewhodoesntsupportanyoneyetbutstickstothefactswithoutmakingupbullshit.txt [editline]17th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=asteroidrules;34254577][url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1150796?[/url] [editline]17th January 2012[/editline] Well he is the master of question dodging. [editline]17th January 2012[/editline] Do you really want me to get into this again?[/QUOTE] Yes I do. How is it exactly that you came to the conclusion that Paul thinks the CIA was behind 9/11?

[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34254592]someonewhodoesntsupportanyoneyetbutstickstothefactswithoutmakingupbullshit.txt[/QUOTE] i really have to teach you how to properly insult someone?

[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34254592]someonewhodoesntsupportanyoneyetbutstickstothefactswithoutmakingupbullshit.txt[/QUOTE] lmao what facts did you really present in your post, all you did was scream "BIASED MEDIA" as if it completely negated the fact that ron paul is a loony

[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34254592]someonewhodoesntsupportanyoneyetbutstickstothefactswithoutmakingupbullshit.txt [editline]17th January 2012[/editline] Yes I do. How is it exactly that you came to the conclusion that Paul thinks the CIA was behind 9/11?[/QUOTE] Somewhere in the middle of all the truthers supporting him, the amount of times he's appeared on conspiracy theory radio/television/internet shows, and the almost puppet-like relationship Alex Jones claims to have with him.

[QUOTE=assholev2;34254479]Even better, they booed when they said Romney's dad was Mexican also this: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuXQ0XapnNM[/media] Guy was ignoring paul and she flipped on on her co-host when she started getting complaints from her live stream[/QUOTE] Why the hell do they have an entire section dedicated to romney's record?

[QUOTE=Lazor;34254602]lmao what facts did you really present in your post, all you did was scream "BIASED MEDIA" as if it completely negated the fact that ron paul is a loony[/QUOTE] Burden of proof lies with the one making claims. [QUOTE=thisispain;34254601]i really have to teach you how to properly insult someone?[/QUOTE] I don't need to resort to insulting people to win debates as often as some people here, so no, not necessary.

[quote]Burden of proof lies with the one making claims. [/quote] how is this even relevant to my fucking post oh my god you paulites are all the same

[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34254636] I don't need to resort to insulting people to win debates as often as some people here, so no, not necessary.[/QUOTE] just making sure

[QUOTE=Lazor;34254643]how is this even relevant to my fucking post oh my god you paulites are all the same[/QUOTE] THe post I responded to had no facts, so mine had none either. If, at some point in this discussion, both parities wish to debate using facts, facts will be posted. Is this really too difficult to understand? Why

[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34254661]THe post I responded to had no facts, so mine had none either. If, at some point in this discussion, both parities wish to debate using facts, facts will be posted. Is this really too difficult to understand? Why[/QUOTE] that is literally the worst reasoning for any post i've ever read congratulations

[QUOTE=mooman1080;34253883]Disregarding the fact that this might start a shit storm... But what exactly is so bad about him?[/QUOTE] He is a racist and a liar.

[QUOTE=Lazor;34254676]that is literally the worst reasoning for any post i've ever read congratulations[/QUOTE] Thank you. Now can we get back to the point: How is it that Ron Paul believes 9/11 was by the CIA? Actually, if you go back and read my post, I edited it to add some evidence suggesting that the 9/11 thing was not true. Go re-read them. Nothing but ramblings from a former staffer. He already denied them. So my original point still stands taht you're gathering your opinions from fallacious, misleading, and biased reporting. They grasp at straws and try to put togehter some off-hand comments and shit that hes made and poof! he believes some CIA garbage!

"Bomb another country? No no booo. We don't want that." "No more wars? Yeah! Yeah! We'll like that!" So we just start bombing other countries for fun. Not for war. Merica - Bombing things for fun since 2012

[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34254679]Thank you. Now can we get back to the point: How is it that Ron Paul believes 9/11 was by the CIA?[/QUOTE] I already answered that.

[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34254661]THe post I responded to had no facts, so mine had none either. If, at some point in this discussion, both parities wish to debate using facts, facts will be posted. Is this really too difficult to understand? Why[/QUOTE] So basically the logic is "If he acts like a child, it's okay for me to do the same"?