Wanna help slow global warming? Stop making babies
125 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25648712]I'm sorry you think that it IS possible that our tiny existence has any effect on nature whatsoever.[/QUOTE]
Tiny existence? Um, we're shitting all over rain forests, releasing thousands of pounds of CO2 everyday and just generally fucking with nature all the time.
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25648712]I'm sorry you think that it IS possible that our tiny existence has any effect on nature whatsoever.[/QUOTE]
Oh hey look a picture of a mine
[img]http://esamultimedia.esa.int/images/EarthObservation/AMEC_story/Palabora_Figure2_H.jpg[/img]
[editline]26th October 2010[/editline]
And an oil-sand mine in canada too!
[img]http://klimagipfel.greenpeace.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/borealer-wald.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25648712]I'm sorry you think that it IS possible that our tiny existence has any effect on nature whatsoever.[/QUOTE]
I hope you know that creatures are dieing 10000 times faster to normal and if you dont think it has something to do with the soil getting destroyed, water becoming undrinkable or the fact that humans are the reason why there are 70% less fish in the sea then well there is no hope for you
Also 40% of all endemic animals are extinct since we created traveling by ship or plane.
[QUOTE=Dashiel;25616880]I'm helping :smug:[/QUOTE]
I am too! :v:
:sigh:
can anybody provide substantial evidence that human-caused global warming is not accurate? All I see is a bunch of people avoiding any hard evidence and dismissing anything their daddy didn't tell them.
It's a really closed minded and stubbornly childish way to live don't you think?
Listen, if you guys truly want to believe that this stuff is happening then be my guest. Our existence is not nearly enough to affect earth in the long run. I'm sorry, it is just not possible.
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25649848]Listen, if you guys truly want to believe that this stuff is happening then be my guest. Our existence is not nearly enough to affect earth in the long run. I'm sorry, it is just not possible.[/QUOTE]
im sorry but 1000 times the natural rate of things dieing is kinda showing it, if you looked in any book made after 1990 you can see that you are wrong
what about the trash island the size of texas, how is that not effecting?
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25649848]Listen, if you guys truly want to believe that this stuff is happening then be my guest. Our existence is not nearly enough to affect earth in the long run. I'm sorry, it is just not possible.[/QUOTE]
and this belief that we can't possibly have any effect on the earth is based on what, exactly?
I think he might be trolling or not worth answering.
[editline]26th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Lazor;25650346]and this belief that we can't possibly have any effect on the earth is based on what, exactly?[/QUOTE]
A human is like this small and the planet is like this big so humans can not do anything to the earth just like bacteria doesn't do anything to humans and ants don't do anything to the woods, right?
:downs:
First off, I'm simply trying to have a discussion with you guys, there really is no need for the utter disrespect and childish antics.
Second, saying things like "1000 times the dieing rate" and "if you look at any book after 1990" means absolutely nothing to me. I really don't know what you're trying to say.
I base my belief on the fact that if a 7.5-mile-wide asteroid (the one that ended the dinosaurs), the impact of which was a billion times more powerful than the Hiroshima atomic explosion and which caused global hell on earth for years could not end life entirely, then our puny 100 year polluting could not possibly even create a blip.
Nature does worse things to itself than we could ever do to it, and it always repairs itself.
Things will be going smoothly long after humans are extinct and you can count on it.
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25650746]First off, I'm simply trying to have a discussion with you guys, there really is no need for the utter disrespect and childish antics.
Second, saying things like "1000 times the dieing rate" and "if you look at any book after 1990" means absolutely nothing to me. I really don't know what you're trying to say.
I base my belief on the fact that if a 7.5-mile-wide asteroid (the one that ended the dinosaurs), the impact of which was a billion times more powerful than the Hiroshima atomic explosion and which caused global hell on earth for years could not end life entirely, then our puny 100 year polluting could not possibly even create a blip.
Nature does worse things to itself than we could ever do to it, and it always repairs itself.
Things will be going smoothly long after humans are extinct and you can count on it.[/QUOTE] ever think that killing the things we eat could be bad for us and like i said before animals are dieng around the same rate that they did when the astroid hit, so theres kinda complete fact that we are messing with the earth and that is bad for all of us, your stupid "i dont care how many animals die" thing is just stupid and if you dont want people to starve you should care about what you are throwing away
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;25651289]ever think that killing the things we eat could be bad for us and like i said before animals are dieng around the same rate that they did when the astroid hit, so theres kinda complete fact that we are messing with the earth and that is bad for all of us, your stupid "i dont care how many animals die" thing is just stupid and if you dont want people to starve you should care about what you are throwing away[/QUOTE]
I'm really sorry, I wish I could respond but I really have no idea what you're saying.
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25651319]I'm really sorry, I wish I could respond but I really have no idea what you're saying.[/QUOTE]
haha like I said before, you can read what Im saying your just using it as an excuse, but whatever i will fix
Ever think that killing the things we eat could be bad for us, I said before animals are dieing around the same rate that they did when the asteroid hit, so there is kinda a complete fact that we are messing with the earth and that is bad for all of us, your "i dont care how many animals die" thing is just stupid and if you dont want people to starve you should care about what you are throwing away
there better for you?
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;25651425]haha like I said before, you can read what Im saying your just using it as an excuse, but whatever i will fix
Ever think that killing the things we eat could be bad for us, I said before animals are dieing around the same rate that they did when the asteroid hit, so there is kinda a complete fact that we are messing with the earth and that is bad for all of us, your "i dont care how many animals die" thing is just stupid and if you dont want people to starve you should care about what you are throwing away
there better for you?[/QUOTE]
I would never make up a silly excuse for not responding, and in most cases if I thought that I had been beat, I would admit it.
However, I can't see how this has anything to do with what I said at all. I'm honestly not trying to avoid what you're saying or anything, I just genuinely don't understand what you're trying to say. When did I ever say anything about killing animals or how "i dont care how many animals die" or about people starving. Like, seriously.
The whole "the earth has cycles" thing is correct, but they aren't the cause of climate change.
[editline]25th October 2010[/editline]
That argument is is always posted at one point or another in these sorts of threads.
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25651634]I would never make up a silly excuse for not responding, and in most cases if I thought that I had been beat, I would admit it.
However, I can't see how this has anything to do with what I said at all. I'm honestly not trying to avoid what you're saying or anything, I just genuinely don't understand what you're trying to say. When did I ever say anything about killing animals or how "i dont care how many animals die" or about people starving. Like, seriously.[/QUOTE]
Your saying that humans cant really effect the earth and im ssaying that animals are dying 10000 times faster then normal, so yea we kinda are.
it's spelled dying
[QUOTE=Lambeth;25651681]it's spelled dying[/QUOTE]
Spell check and google call it a word, strange I can even find it in the dictionary.
Its funny because you got proven wrong by a dyslexic
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;25651675]Your saying that humans cant really effect the earth and im ssaying that animals are dying 10000 times faster then normal, so yea we kinda are.[/QUOTE]
There is absolutely no evidence that animals are dying 1000 times faster due to humans. Seriously, where are you getting this information.
[QUOTE=Lambeth;25651652]The whole "the earth has cycles" thing is correct, but they aren't the cause of climate change.
[editline]25th October 2010[/editline]
That argument is is always posted at one point or another in these sorts of threads.[/QUOTE]
Earth has cycles, but they aren't CAUSED by climate change, climate change is CAUSED by the cycles.
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;25651701]Spell check and google call it a word, strange I can even find it in the dictionary.
Its funny because you got proven wrong by a dyslexic[/QUOTE]
The proper use is "dying."
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25651778]There is absolutely no evidence that animals are dying 1000 times faster due to humans. Seriously, where are you getting this information.
Earth has cycles, but they aren't CAUSED by climate change, climate change is CAUSED by the cycles.
The proper use is "dying."[/QUOTE]
Im sorry did i say 1000 I meant to say 10000 and im getting this information from old biology text book, Bill Nye, animal planet and any were else biology is talked about. scientists are calling this time in history a great extinction.
[editline]26th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25651778]The proper use is "dying."[/QUOTE]
so google and wikipedia are lies
I looked it up and it says both ways are correct
You're thinking of the Milankovitch cycles, which happen over tens of thousands of years.
Alright so I'm supposed to believe that the 30 million species that inhabit our planet are all doomed because of us, even when we're finding new species of animals constantly?
here milkyway [url]http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/01/humans-now-wiping-out-species-1000-times-natural-rate.php[/url]
[url]http://soilerosion.net/[/url]
also watch the movie water wars
my 666 post, yay for me
Condoms, protecting the future of our children.
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25651883]Alright so I'm supposed to believe that the 30 million species that inhabit our planet are all doomed because of us, even when we're finding new species of animals constantly?[/QUOTE]
because the environment is like a building and if you take out just a few animals it all falls down, not to say we are only taking out a few.
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;25651883]Alright so I'm supposed to believe that the 30 million species that inhabit our planet are all doomed because of us, even when we're finding new species of animals constantly?[/QUOTE]
well not all of them
sleep for me, so look at those links milkyway and then talk to me the next day
condoms can save the world
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
