Thief who has both legs and one arms broken by victim - claims that he is the real victim and that t
317 replies, posted
[QUOTE=codemaster85;43690467]According to some people, two men (one with a weapon) that have been stealing your shit for a while should just be papped and told no. Seriously are you fucking serious. The whole "well that's overkill/he's 50 years old" argument is almost as bad as the why didn't he shoot him in the legs or why did they shoot him 20 times. When there's a threat against you, you make sure he can't do shit towards you.[/QUOTE]
when there's a threat against me i don't fucking panic and shoot to kill because my murderous intentions are obviously purer than his
[editline]27th January 2014[/editline]
also holy fuck have none of you retards ever torrented something?? bamzingwauw you're fucking criminals too i bet your minds are blown (no no this is different i don't mind some crimes)
don't even compare stealing fifty dollars worth of a commodity to my lifetime commitment to pirating things people have spent their entire careers developing, some laws are just [I]meant to be broken[/I] and some laws you [I]have to be a sociopath[/I] to break
[QUOTE=slamex;43690837]You trust people a little too much there mate.
People aren't going to sympathise with someone who got screwed stealing. People are going to sympathise with a man who was badly injured from a mad man beating him with a stick as he only needed diesel to help.... feed his family....[/QUOTE]
I'm not sympathizing with the thief, you idiot. I'm saying there's no reason to believe that the guy didn't hit the thief a couple good times. I know I would have.
Chasing somebody down, tackling him, and breaking his arms and legs is not "self defense," nor is it justice in any civilized sense of the word. It was an old man stealing petrol, for God's sake.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;43690937]Chasing somebody down, tackling him, and breaking his arms and legs is not "self defense."[/QUOTE]
The breaking happened during the tackle. Notice how big the guy who tackled the OLD 54 YEAR OLD FRAIL MAN? God damn, you guys lack common sense.
[QUOTE=FlakAttack;43690729]Don't worry gentlemen of Facepunch, these brave souls have already told you what you think; there is no need to voice your opinion now. Calm yourself and join the hivemind in celebration.
I can't wait until one of you guys pulls a Godwin out of this somehow.[/QUOTE]
Voice your opinion all you want dude just don't get upset when someone replies negatively
[QUOTE=Soleeedus;43690861]no SH thread is complete without someone calling everyone sociopathic[/QUOTE]
Generally acceptable when people are actually acting sociopathic though
[QUOTE=FlakAttack;43690729]Don't worry gentlemen of Facepunch, these brave souls have already told you what you think; there is no need to voice your opinion now. Calm yourself and join the hivemind in celebration.
I can't wait until one of you guys pulls a Godwin out of this somehow.[/QUOTE]
ah yes because this thread is a bastion of differing opinons
[img]http://i.imgur.com/SxwxKNv.png[/img]
would it have helped if i said [i]the vast majority of facepunch (79+%)[/i]
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;43690937]Chasing somebody down, tackling him, and breaking his arms and legs is not "self defense," nor is it justice in any civilized sense of the word. It was an old man stealing petrol, for God's sake.[/QUOTE]
You imply that the breaking of his limbs was done with intent. If I was chasing a dude who stole my shit, I wouldn't immediately think "I'm gonna break your fuckin' legs."
[QUOTE=Protocol7;43690923]I'm not sympathizing with the thief, you idiot. I'm saying there's no reason to believe that the guy didn't hit the thief a couple good times. I know I would have.[/QUOTE]
Well, if we're doing name calling.
I didn't say you sympathised with him, I meant he might not come off bad if he changed his story to make it sound the other guy was out for blood.
For all we know the thieves could have actually thought back and got the shit end of the stick. No witnesses mean you have to go on the stories you're given.
[QUOTE=innerfire34;43690872]when there's a threat against me i don't fucking panic and shoot to kill because my murderous intentions are obviously purer than his
[editline]27th January 2014[/editline]
also holy fuck have none of you retards ever torrented something?? bamzingwauw you're fucking criminals too i bet your minds are blown (no no this is different i don't mind some crimes)
don't even compare stealing fifty dollars worth of a commodity to my lifetime commitment to pirating things people have spent their entire careers developing, some laws are just [I]meant to be broken[/I] and some laws you [I]have to be a sociopath[/I] to break[/QUOTE]
oh no wait when people pirate shit there's no chance of the victims of the crime personally retaliating against me so there's no fear to keep me in check that's the only reason i don't steal things irl this scumbag should have seen this coming (i know i would have)
[QUOTE=innerfire34;43690978]oh no wait when people pirate shit there's no chance of the victims of the crime personally retaliating against me so there's no fear to keep me in check that's the only reason i don't steal things irl this scumbag should have seen this coming (i know i would have)[/QUOTE]
That the only thing stopping you from stealing shit is fear of getting your legs broken says a lot about you.
can we talk about the autistic thirteen year olds in this thread not considering themselves criminals even when they break the law because they're afraid of the [I]real, malicious[/i] criminals who follow the exact same line of thinking
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;43690937]Chasing somebody down, tackling him, and breaking his arms and legs is not "self defense," nor is it justice in any civilized sense of the word. It was an old man stealing petrol, for God's sake.[/QUOTE]
Gonna let you in on an SH secret: This isn't about self defense. It's about punishment.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;43687246]You reap what you sow.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TestECull;43687245]When you try to steal something you forfeit any right to not having your face caved in.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Sgt-NiallR;43691002]That the only thing stopping you from stealing shit is fear of getting your legs broken says a lot about you.[/QUOTE]
i'm sorry should i use more emoticons since you can't read tone
like how do you read what i posted and take it seriously
To the people who are okay with this, I just have one question for them, Are you also okay with cops who use excessive force, and are you okay with police brutality?
Because you really can't be okay with one and then be against the other, and they are both problems with society, particularly the blood lust countries like the US.
[QUOTE=innerfire34;43691012]can we talk about the autistic thirteen year olds in this thread not considering themselves criminals even when they break the law because they're afraid of the [I]real, malicious[/] criminals who follow the exact same line of thinking[/QUOTE]
"let's go steal a can of petrol! it won't be hard, in and out, nobody will be the wiser!"
[QUOTE=Protocol7;43691031]"let's go steal a can of petrol! it won't be hard, in and out, nobody will be the wiser!"[/QUOTE]
*clicks download on every single movie screener and unreleased but cracked game*
[QUOTE=a203xi;43691026]To the people who are okay with this, I just have one question for them, Are you also okay with cops who use excessive force, and are you okay with police brutality?
Because you really can't be okay with one and then be against the other, and they are both problems with society, particularly the blood lust countries like the US.[/QUOTE]
again, all about intent. a lot of "police brutality" cases involve the person being apprehended being very belligerent and non-compliant, which means the police often have to fight back to apprehend the person. sure, there probably have been a lot of times when cops will beat a dude to near death with a nightstick, but let's not assume that every time a cop breaks someone's arm, it was because the cop wanted to be an asshole.
[QUOTE=pkhzor;43690958]The breaking happened during the tackle. Notice how big the guy who tackled the OLD 54 YEAR OLD FRAIL MAN? God damn, you guys lack common sense.[/QUOTE]
Oh, well that's fine then. I mean, what's wrong with a big strong guy full-body tackling a frail old man over some gasoline? I'm not saying it was right for the old dude to be stealin' shit, but that is an [I]absurd[/I] use of force to use against an old man over something so minor.
However, I suppose I should count myself lucky that there aren't more people arguing for an even harsher response to this. This is Facepunch, where people openly defended a man who blew off a girl's head with a shotgun for ringing his doorbell, and for shooting an old man with Alzheimer's in the back for confusedly knocking on the wrong door late at night.
[editline].[/editline]
And where it was legitimately argued that the legally blind should be allowed to carry guns. Let's face it: Facepunch's perception of "self defense" is disgusting and reprehensible.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;43691072]Oh, well that's fine then. I mean, what's wrong with a big strong guy full-body tackling a frail old man over some gasoline? I'm not saying it was right for the old dude to be stealin' shit, but that is an [I]absurd[/I] use of force to use against an old man over something so minor.
However, I suppose I should count myself lucky that there aren't more people arguing for an even harsher response to this. This is Facepunch, where people openly defended a man who blew off a girl's head with a shotgun for ringing his doorbell, and for shooting an old man with Alzheimer's in the back for confusedly knocking on the wrong door late at night.[/QUOTE]
the world is a very scary place bda u were in the military u should wise up!!!
the scary bits aren't even the hundreds of other things that are far more likely to kill me by chance it's the [B]BAD PEOPLE!![/B]
[QUOTE=innerfire34;43691095]the world is a very scary place bda u were in the military u should wise up!!![/QUOTE]
Called in an armed drone strike on a guy for cutting me off, because that's [I]dangerous![/I]
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;43691072]
However, I suppose I should count myself lucky that there aren't more people arguing for an even harsher response to this. This is Facepunch, where people openly defended a man who blew off a girl's head with a shotgun for ringing his doorbell, and for shooting an old man with Alzheimer's in the back for confusedly knocking on the wrong door late at night.
[editline].[/editline]
And where it was legitimately argued that the legally blind should be allowed to carry guns. Let's face it: Facepunch's perception of "self defense" is disgusting and reprehensible.[/QUOTE]
I thought those were more on arguing about guns?
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;43691072]Oh, well that's fine then. I mean, what's wrong with a big strong guy full-body tackling a frail old man over some gasoline? I'm not saying it was right for the old dude to be stealin' shit, but that is an [I]absurd[/I] use of force to use against an old man over something so minor.
However, I suppose I should count myself lucky that there aren't more people arguing for an even harsher response to this. This is Facepunch, where people openly defended a man who blew off a girl's head with a shotgun for ringing his doorbell, and for shooting an old man with Alzheimer's in the back for confusedly knocking on the wrong door late at night.
[editline].[/editline]
And where it was legitimately argued that the legally blind should be allowed to carry guns. Let's face it: Facepunch's perception of "self defense" is disgusting and reprehensible.[/QUOTE]
I don't think the majority of people supported that crazy old man shooting the car crash victim in the back of the head.
You really are dumb and should stop shitposting. The old guy was stealing his stuff, what do you expect? "pls sir, stop stealing my stuff or I'll say mean things towards your general direction" as the thief runs the fuck away?
Just stop posting and do a favor for yourself and everyone else in the world.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;43691072]
And where it was legitimately argued that the legally blind should be allowed to carry guns. Let's face it: Facepunch's perception of "self defense" is disgusting and reprehensible.[/QUOTE]
um, whats wrong with blind people having guns, you fascist? don't you know about the second amendment? its in a little thing called the consitution, thank you very much.
[editline]27th January 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=pkhzor;43691179]I don't think the majority of people supported that crazy old man shooting the car crash victim in the back of the head.
You really are dumb and should stop shitposting. The old guy was stealing his stuff, what do you expect? "pls sir, stop stealing my stuff or I'll say mean things towards your general direction" as the thief runs the fuck away?
Just stop posting and do a favor for yourself and everyone else in the world.[/QUOTE]
yeah well its not really self defense if you are aggressively chasing someone down just to beat the shit out of them.
[QUOTE=pkhzor;43691179]I don't think the majority of people supported that crazy old man shooting the car crash victim in the back of the head.
You really are dumb and should stop shitposting. The old guy was stealing his stuff, what do you expect? "pls sir, stop stealing my stuff or I'll say mean things towards your general direction" as the thief runs the fuck away?
Just stop posting and do a favor for yourself and everyone else in the world.[/QUOTE]
if bda is a shitposter facepunch must be several magnitudes below 4chan
[QUOTE=pkhzor;43691179]I don't think the majority of people supported that crazy old man shooting the car crash victim in the back of the head.
You really are dumb and should stop shitposting. The old guy was stealing his stuff, what do you expect? "pls sir, stop stealing my stuff or I'll say mean things towards your general direction" as the thief runs the fuck away?
Just stop posting and do a favor for yourself and everyone else in the world.[/QUOTE]
I disagree with American's belief on how this situation was handled. But I don't think he was entitled to those remarks.
Can you imagine seriously calling BDA a shitposter (Aside from all those times he ironically shitposts anyway)
[QUOTE=pkhzor;43691179]I don't think the majority of people supported that crazy old man shooting the car crash victim in the back of the head.
You really are dumb and should stop shitposting. The old guy was stealing his stuff, what do you expect? "pls sir, stop stealing my stuff or I'll say mean things towards your general direction" as the thief runs the fuck away?
Just stop posting and do a favor for yourself and everyone else in the world.[/QUOTE]
You should consider breaking my arms and legs for subjecting you to these differing, and inconvenient perspectives.
[QUOTE=DaysBefore;43691236]Can you imagine seriously calling BDA a shitposter (Aside from all those times he ironically shitposts anyway)[/QUOTE]
~parkours into gun control thread~
[QUOTE=pkhzor;43691179]I don't think the majority of people supported that crazy old man shooting the car crash victim in the back of the head.
You really are dumb and should stop shitposting. The old guy was stealing his stuff, what do you expect? "pls sir, stop stealing my stuff or I'll say mean things towards your general direction" as the thief runs the fuck away?
Just stop posting and do a favor for yourself and everyone else in the world.[/QUOTE]
hey can i ask you a question have you ever pirated anything
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;43691239]You should consider breaking my arms and legs for subjecting you to these differing, and inconvenient perspectives.[/QUOTE]
If you come onto my property to steal my gasoline and make a run for it, we can maybe achieve that if I tackle your fat ass but you'd probably roll away before I could get a strong enough grip to break both of your legs and an arm in the same swift movement.
You're trying to argue for the sake of arguing. The old man stole, got tackled, broke bones cause of it, shouldn't of ran. There's nothing to even argue here other than offtopic arguments how thieves shouldn't get mutilated/beat up. No idea why you're even posting here without saying anything other than "In my world, this is unfair"
[QUOTE=pkhzor;43691284]If you come onto my property to steal my gasoline and make a run for it, we can maybe achieve that if I tackle your fat ass but you'd probably roll away before I could get a strong enough grip to break both of your legs and an arm in the same swift movement.
You're trying to argue for the sake of arguing. The old man stole, got tackled, broke bones cause of it, shouldn't of ran. There's nothing to even argue here other than offtopic arguments how thieves shouldn't get mutilated/beat up. No idea why you're even posting here without saying anything other than "In my world, this is unfair"[/QUOTE]
[quote]Green and Cross tried to escape into a neighbouring field with jerry cans full of stolen fuel.
But Mr Woodhouse chased Green - and caught him near their getaway car. He then attacked Green leaving him with two broken legs and a broken arm.
[/quote]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.