Woman tweets as she attacks burglar with bear mace

[arlygoodbrownie]

[QUOTE=AJisAwesome15;38661192]Do people HONESTLY feel the need to tweet about
EVERY
FUCKING
THING[/QUOTE]

That's the point of twitter. Updating on more common activities.

Not as common as "eating a bagel at the moment," but a moment like attacking with a robber? Definitely Twitter worthy.

[Beardy]

[QUOTE=ForgottenKane;38662118]No it doesn't. Don't assume we know what you know. We can't read your mind.[/QUOTE]

do you like, stalk my posts or something just to flame me? everywhere i post apparently you have something to say about me.

[Deunan]

[QUOTE=yawmwen;38661605]no it's not the same thing at all.

here is my states definition of entrapment

RCW 9A.16.070
(1) In any prosecution for a crime, it is a defense that:

(a) The criminal design originated in the mind of law enforcement officials, or any person acting under their direction, and

(b) The actor was lured or induced to commit a crime which the actor had not otherwise intended to commit.

(2) The defense of entrapment is not established by a showing only that law enforcement officials merely afforded the actor an opportunity to commit a crime.

[url]http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.16.070[/url]

[editline]1st December 2012[/editline]

cops do controlled buys, bait cars, bait bikes, prostitution stings, and shit like that all the time. it's not illegal[/QUOTE]

Ah thanks for filling that hole. So entrapment in the US system is essentially directly influencing the potential "client" into commiting an illegal act as opposed to merely accepting an act from him.

Thought the distinction the type of behaviour the police did, but differently.

[TamTamJam]

[QUOTE=Fire Kracker;38661500]i wonder how bear spray feels

i mean bears can take bullets and be like fuck you anyways[/QUOTE]

I've gotten bear spray in the face before, it wasn't up close so i didn't get the full effects, but basically it made my whole face, mouth, throat and tongue burn like hell, constantly running water helped a bit.

[RayvenQ]

[QUOTE=wraithcat;38662231]Ah thanks for filling that hole. So entrapment in the US system is essentially directly influencing the potential "client" into commiting an illegal act as opposed to merely accepting an act from him.

Thought the distinction the type of behaviour the police did, but differently.[/QUOTE]

Pretty much.

Scenario A. Undercover Cop poses as a hooker and allows people to solicit her - Not Entrapment
Scenario B. Undercover Cop poses as a hooker and goes up to people and attempts to get them to solicit her - Entrapment.