[QUOTE=S31-Syntax;35881195]He's probably not gonna respond to that because "I don't have to prove shit" because "I'm not the one saying X"
Oh look he responded.
"I fight crime"
Oh wait is this one of those "blanket statements" I heard about earlier?[/QUOTE]
look let me explain this to you in a simple statement:
what lankist is trying to demonstrate is that the notion of worthlessness breaks down very quickly.
he doesn't have to fucking prove anything because he doesn't care about the concept of worthlessness, he only wants to demonstrate that it's a silly concept.
and he responded with "I fight crime" (he's a prosecutor FYI) because there's no fucking point to him trying to prove that he's better than you. that's not what his point is.
[QUOTE=faze;35881219]What is your job title?[/QUOTE]
Captain.
(I practice my trade on a boat.)
((I'm the captain.))
[QUOTE=DaysBefore;35881237]Or you could, you know, take his post literally. He's a lawyer if I remember correctly. But whatever, I guess it's easier to just call anyone who opposes you a troll in an effort to legitimize his opinions.[/QUOTE]
I highly doubt Lankist is a lawyer given his demeanor.
[QUOTE=Sanius;35878405]that makes no sense
there's just as much a point for an illegal to own a gun as there is for a legal to own a gun
[editline]1[/editline]
idk maybe if I hated brown people I would be able to understand your viewpoint better[/QUOTE]
Hey guys, I can't be assed to legally get into the country and pay taxes and all that, no I think I'll just ignore those laws, but I'm going to use the law when it's beneficial to me, that cool with all of you?
The U.S constitution protects CITIZENS, if you're not a CITIZEN well then wouldn't you know it? You're not given the rights of a CITIZEN, why one might ask? Because you are NOT a CITIZEN.
Call me crazy for thinking that things worked like that, maybe I'm just a racist hick for actually thinking that people should be able to use the law only when it's beneficial to them. You do realize that the U.S is the only fucking country that has this stupid border dispute? Go try to cross and live illegally in ANY European country, you'll be deported.
Holy shit, Lankist, Faze, Xenocide, thisispain in one and same thread. I should read from the beginning.
[QUOTE=Lankist;35881240]Captain.
(I practice my trade on a boat.)
((I'm the captain.))[/QUOTE]
You do that.
lankist plz stop
[QUOTE=thisispain;35881238](he's a prosecutor FYI)[/QUOTE]
No I'm not
dude nobody here understands what my job is. thats why i stop answering that dumb question.
I say "lawyer" and everyone immediately assumes I'm Atticus Finch or something.
[QUOTE=draugur;35881250]Hey guys, I can't be assed to legally get into the country and pay taxes and all that, no I think I'll just ignore those laws, but I'm going to use the law when it's beneficial to me, that cool with all of you?[/QUOTE]
Hey guys, I can't be assed to be correct and state truths, no I think I'll just ignore debate rules, that cool with all of you?
[QUOTE=Lankist;35881210]Oh no, the one arguing for less stress on illegal immigration is a drain on society
woe is me
meanwhile the one who says all unskilled labor doesn't belong in this country is certainly contributing with those circuit boards that a robot could be fixing.[/QUOTE]
Except your damaging your own argument now.
If a robot could do the work why do we need anyone, legal or illegal? If that's the case according to your logic we should replace our entire workforce with robots.
And no. Robots CAN'T fix circuit boards. They can build them but it's not efficient to program a robot to fix specific problems. By the time you've got the robot fixing the one problem you could have fixed multiple ones yourself.
[QUOTE=faze;35881248]I highly doubt Lankist is a lawyer given his demeanor.[/QUOTE]
Yes because lawyers are known throughout the world as being shining paragons of integrity.
[QUOTE=Lankist;35881267]No I'm not
dude nobody here understands what my job is. thats why i stop answering that dumb question.
I say "lawyer" and everyone immediately assumes I'm Atticus Finch or something.[/QUOTE]
It's the glasses.
[QUOTE=Ven Kaeo;35881273]Except your damaging your own argument now.
If a robot could do the work why do we need anyone, legal or illegal? If that's the case according to your logic we should replace our entire workforce with robots.
And no. Robots CAN'T fix circuit boards. They can build them but it's not efficient to program a robot to fix specific problems. By the time you've got the robot fixing the one problem you could have fixed multiple ones yourself.[/QUOTE]
JESUS CHRIST
[QUOTE=Ven Kaeo;35881273]If a robot could do the work why do we need anyone, legal or illegal? If that's the case according to your logic we should replace our entire workforce with robots.[/QUOTE]
We should.
And then we should kick out all the proles like you.
[QUOTE=Ven Kaeo;35881273]Except your damaging your own argument now.
If a robot could do the work why do we need anyone, legal or illegal? If that's the case according to your logic we should replace our entire workforce with robots.
And no. Robots CAN'T fix circuit boards. They can build them but it's not efficient to program a robot to fix specific problems. By the time you've got the robot fixing the one problem you could have fixed multiple ones yourself.[/QUOTE]
Having our entire workforce replaced with robots would mean we would need skilled laborers to build the robots.
[QUOTE=faze;35881248]I highly doubt Lankist is a lawyer given his demeanor.[/QUOTE]
And I highly doubt you have an IQ above 35 given your demeanor but I'm not going to make baseless accusations because someone was rude to me on the internet.
[QUOTE=Sanius;35878480]who are they harming by being here illegally. why do they deserve to be demonized. why does the government have the right to tell people where they can and can not be[/QUOTE]
because they were denied access to a country for a reason?
[QUOTE=Lankist;35881222]Skills are not recognized by the immigration authorities without degrees to back them up, pal.[/QUOTE]
Do you have something to back that up? I always thought the "usefulness" thing in immigration services was more a silent value than one actually written in stone.
This is the reason for my doubt:
[url]http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resources/B3en.pdf[/url]
[quote]
What are the basic requirements to apply for
naturalization?
Generally, to be eligible for naturalization you must:
• Be age 18 or older;
• Be a permanent resident for a certain amount of time
(usually 5 years but less for some individuals);
• Be a person of good moral character;
• Have a basic knowledge of U.S. history and government;
• Have a period of continuous residence and physical presence in the United States; and
• Be able to read, write, and speak basic English.
[/quote]
[QUOTE=Ven Kaeo;35881273]Except your damaging your own argument now.
If a robot could do the work why do we need anyone, legal or illegal? If that's the case according to your logic we should replace our entire workforce with robots.
And no. Robots CAN'T fix circuit boards. They can build them but it's not efficient to program a robot to fix specific problems. By the time you've got the robot fixing the one problem you could have fixed multiple ones yourself.[/QUOTE]
I'm pretty sure that's his point. That according to your argument, it follows that we shoudl replacer the workforce with robots.ç
[QUOTE=wizardsbane;35881305]Do you have something to back that up? I always thought the "usefulness" thing in immigration services was more a silent value than one actually written in stone.
This is the reason for my doubt:
[url]http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resources/B3en.pdf[/url][/QUOTE]
It isn't written in stone. But you simply won't get in without provable skills.
[QUOTE=cornndog;35881293]Having our entire workforce replaced with robots would mean we would need skilled laborers to build the robots.[/QUOTE]
I think Ven Kaeo could be replaced by a turnip and no one would notice
Actually he'd probably get promoted
[QUOTE=wizardsbane;35881305]Do you have something to back that up? I always thought the "usefulness" thing in immigration services was more a silent value than one actually written in stone.
This is the reason for my doubt:
[url]http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resources/B3en.pdf[/url][/QUOTE]
You need more than a basic understanding of U.S history and government.
The process still takes a very long time on average.
The less degrees and education you have the longer it takes.
[QUOTE=wizardsbane;35881305]Do you have something to back that up? I always thought the "usefulness" thing in immigration services was more a silent value than one actually written in stone.
This is the reason for my doubt:
[url]http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resources/B3en.pdf[/url][/QUOTE]
you need a green card to become naturalized.
[QUOTE=DaysBefore;35881296]And I highly doubt you have an IQ above 35 given your demeanor but I'm not going to make baseless accusations because someone was rude to me on the internet.[/QUOTE]
Pretty sure a mentally retarded person couldn't hold down a job requiring thought at the pay grade I am at. Go ahead, keep assuming. This is the internet, I have nothing to prove.
[QUOTE=MountainWatcher;35881307]I'm pretty sure that's his point. That according to your argument, it follows that we shoudl replacer the workforce with robots.ç[/QUOTE]
No. My point is we shouldn't allow unskilled labour into the country.
Anyway I'm done with this shit. The debate has gotten so far off track from the original article of "illegal immigrants can't own guns" and Lankist is just some bored kid trolling the forum. He can't even answer a simple fucking question to validate his arguments instead he gives bullshit responses like 'hur I fite criem'
I'm out.
[QUOTE=Ven Kaeo;35881340] Lankist is just some bored kid trolling the forum.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I want to see his test results saying he passed the bar exam. Then I'll believe this hype about him being a lawyer.
[QUOTE=Lankist;35881267]No I'm not
dude nobody here understands what my job is. thats why i stop answering that dumb question.
I say "lawyer" and everyone immediately assumes I'm Atticus Finch or something.[/QUOTE]
Is it like this?
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiralty_law[/url]
First thing that came up.
Are you like an insurance lawyer? Not really in court, but an advisor? Kind of interested.
[QUOTE=Ven Kaeo;35881340]No. My point is we shouldn't allow unskilled labour into the country.
Anyway I'm done with this shit. The debate has gotten so far off track from the original article of "illegal immigrants can't own guns" and Lankist is just some bored kid trolling the forum. He can't even answer a simple fucking question to validate his arguments instead he gives bullshit responses like 'hur I fite criem'
I'm out.[/QUOTE]
Ain't my argument, bro. Your argument.
My argument is "let's stop messing with the brown people"
[QUOTE=Ven Kaeo;35881340]No. My point is we shouldn't allow unskilled labour into the country.
Anyway I'm done with this shit. The debate has gotten so far off track from the original article of "illegal immigrants can't own guns" and Lankist is just some bored kid trolling the forum. He can't even answer a simple fucking question to validate his arguments instead he gives bullshit responses like 'hur I fite criem'
I'm out.[/QUOTE]
Validate his arguments you say?
I thought they were your arguments?
I guess i'm confused on who thinks worthless people should be allowed to immigrate.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
