9/11 Truth movement holds series of press conferences
333 replies, posted
Just report this ninnyhammer for spamming. There is nothing else to be done.
Quick! to the ignorance bunker! where his logic and science cannot hurt our brittle reality we hope is the truth! :downs:
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25134040]You're as foolish as you are ignorant. I don't respost shit, this is a brand new article with BRAND NEW SOURCES. Just because all of the organizations have to do with 9/11, doesn't mean they're all the same damn thing. :downswords:
[editline]06:53PM[/editline]
Also, I like how you guys are all [I][B]assuming[/B][/I] all of your critique about it. You have no idea what the scientists are doing, how they're doing it, and what conclusions they've come to. [B]You just think you know what you're talking about after taking one glimpse at the article when in actuality you know less than [B]your inflated ego lets on you do.[/B][/B][/QUOTE]
Correct me if I'm wrong here people, but didn't this tinfoil hat wearing idiot just do the exact same thing?
Hypocrisy is tasty isn't it.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25133663]Let me clarify: because this thread is about 9/11, the people involved should be discredited, the subject banned, and the people involved deemed insane. :protarget:[/QUOTE]
lol 9ersecut11on
[QUOTE=ThePunisher1;25132199]I think most people will sit on the fence about this, reason being that thinking that the US government carried this out is extreme, yet to also think Al Quaeda could have carried out what was a fairly sophisticated attack, is also extreme, both eventualities are far fetched.
I work as a structural designer (one under structural engineer) and have always been fairly sceptical about the events of 9/11, a building just does not fail to fire like that, especially a steelwork structure.[/QUOTE]
Lax builders and corrupt inspectors?
Poor quality materials?
Insufficient maintainence?
Any of those could have caused it. I'm just stating what could have caused it, not what I think caused it. I don't have enough information to form an opinion.
[QUOTE=bravehat;25134223]Correct me if I'm wrong here
[/QUOTE]
Done it before, glad to do so again.
I actually[B] did research [/B]into the sources behind the article, the people referenced, etc. You on the other hand just pulled some conclusion out of your ass based on speculation alone.
[QUOTE=bravehat;25134223]
Hypocrisy is tasty isn't it.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25134403]Done it before, glad to do so again.
I actually[B] did research [/B]into the sources behind the article, the people referenced, etc. You on the other hand just pulled some conclusion out of your ass based on speculation alone.[/QUOTE]
I'd love to one day understand a conspiracy theorists mind, it's probably something ridiculous in order to make some of the connections you people make.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25132159][IMG]http://www.reuters.com/resources_v2/images/logo.gif[/IMG]
Looks like the whistleblowers are starting to come out. What have you 9/11-truth naysayers have to say about this?
[URL="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS204116+09-Sep-2010+PRN20100909"]source[/URL][/QUOTE]
This isn't a news article, it's a press release written by the troofers. See how Reuters credits it to "PR Newswire?"
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25134403]Done it before, glad to do so again.
I actually[B] did research [/B]into the sources behind the article, the people referenced, etc. You on the other hand just pulled some conclusion out of your ass based on speculation alone.[/QUOTE]
Oh you did research you say? Well allow me to put it to the test with my forensics training to judge the accuracy of this so called scientific research.
Suddenly ShudaikoX pulls a perfect disappearing act.
[QUOTE=bravehat;25134722]Oh you did research you say? Well allow me to put it to the test with my forensics training to judge the accuracy of this so called scientific research.
Suddenly ShudaikoX pulls a perfect disappearing act.[/QUOTE]
Do it.
Right, because having a life is the same difference as running away on FP, right?
[editline]07:40PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=TH89;25134528]This isn't a news article, it's a press release written by the troofers. See how Reuters credits it to "PR Newswire?"[/QUOTE]
So that's your justification for changing the thread title even though the article is named the same?
Do it?
Well give me the fucking research dolt, it's difficult to examine the fucking air around me for your research
And you managed to fir an entire life into half an hour? Sweet jesus this mans a time lord!
i'm still wondering about the motives
i mean i'm as paranoid as the next lunatic but even i still don't see any motive for this
extremely interesting c-span coverage on 9/11
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkVwDePQuYA[/media]
for those of you interested into who, how, why, etc...
Here's the truth or at least the only part I believe to be true about this day - the twin towers collapsed after planes crashed into it.
Anything more and it's riddled with conspiracy theories.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25135504][URL="http://www.facepunch.com/#"]View YouTUBE video[/URL]
[URL]http://youtube.com/watch?v=DkVwDePQuYA[/URL]
extremely interesting c-span coverage on 9/11
[editline]07:59PM[/editline]
for those of you interested into who, how, why, etc...[/QUOTE]
Wake up to the NWO is the first thing I read.
Just leave now before you get your ass torn off, for your own sake and pride, leave now.
No really, that video is some old fuck spouting bullshit. Where is his fucking evidence? And people in america take this seriously?
Thank fuck in scotland your average person actually has the basic intelligence to ask "so where is he getting his information from?"
[QUOTE=bravehat;25135409]Do it?
Well give me the fucking research dolt, it's difficult to examine the fucking air around me for your research
[/QUOTE]
Do I have to hold your hand too? There are multiple sources listed in the OP for you to dive into and find more information, I'm not going to baby you into figuring things out for yourself.
[editline]08:03PM[/editline]
'I saw something I didn't agree with, so I didn't bother to even acknowledge it. But you're the one who doesn't know what you're talking about!1!11!' :downswords:
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25135595]Do I have to hold your hand too? There are multiple sources listed in the OP for you to dive into and find more information, I'm not going to baby you into figuring things out for yourself.[/QUOTE]
You're ridiculous. Learn burden of proof if you're going to argue these things so you seem less like a fucking prat. Frankly, giving whatever research over right now is probably the only way to save yourself here. You're talking about NWO and "troof" movements like they're real with no evidence that stands up, so give some that does stand up.
[QUOTE=Jmir 54;25133863]So explain to me why the U.S. government would want to blow their own buildings, Im not feeling too clever right now.[/QUOTE]
Remember the Maine, to Hell with Spain!
Look it up. Spain was fucking surrendering and all of a sudden one of our ships "blew up" and we declared war on them.
Ontopic: Glad to hear people are blowing whistles and declaring they want a full-blown investigation.
everyone is wrong! i'm right! I KNOW THE TRUTH AND EVERYONE IS SHEEP!
The OP itself has [B]multiple [/B]hotlinks for you to read the evidence that backs up my logic. I know what the burden of proof is, but quite frankly, given how people come across 'debates' in this board nonsensical arguments are commonly abound. If I come across as unprofessional, its due to the frustration of dealing with the people on this board.
No, fuck off. You make a claim, you deliver evidence when you are asked for it. That shit wouldn't fly in court.
And that guy is a fucking idiot, he gives no evidence there at all, then starts talking about how an NWO is plotting a nuclear war instigated by a nuclear strike on Iran.
Really, Iran? Who the fuck do they threaten? Who the fuck could threaten America either for anyone to instigate a nuclear war?
This is all hear say, myth, idiocy and idiots indulging idiots.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25135068]So that's your justification for changing the thread title even though the article is named the same?[/QUOTE]
It's not an article, it's a press release. It was named by the troofer who wrote it.
I changed it to something neutral, like you would do if you had a sense of journalistic integrity. If I wanted to be biased I could have changed it to "9/11 Truthers hold press conferences in hopeless bid for attention"
Why didn't you lock this shitty thread whilst you were at it? Whatching a Troofer flail is not particularly amusing after the third post.
You guys all stopped posting about the actual topic about 20 posts in. Can you really not handle a discussion on 9-11 so much so that you bash the person until the thread dies?
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25135953]You guys all stopped posting about the actual topic about 20 posts in. Can you really not handle a discussion on 9-11 so much so that you bash the person until the thread dies?[/QUOTE]
Why bother? Every time you start losing an argument in one of your 9/11 threads you abandon ship and start a new thread a day later.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25135953]You guys all stopped posting about the actual topic about 20 posts in. Can you really not handle a discussion on 9-11 so much so that you bash the person until the thread dies?[/QUOTE]
Half baked, evidenceless, conspiracy theory like paranoid delusions are not discussion. If there was real evidence, I'd love to talk about it.
I am discussing it, you and your so called "evidence" is so horrendously pathetic it's amazing.
No really, let's compare it with pictures of food.
Here is good evidence:
[img]http://img4.sunset.com/i/2003/05/chicken-stir-fry-m.jpg?300:300[/img]
Here we can see that the flavours will be dancing on your tongue in a flamenco of culinary delights.
Your evidence:
[img]http://media.bonnint.net/apimage/96c1d3cd-64e1-4a71-ba81-e7984701e9e7.jpg[/img]
Something might be dancing on your tongue but it sure as fuck ain't culinary delights, maybe it's maggots or Kangaroo semen, who knows.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25133663]Let me clarify: because this thread is about 9/11, the people involved should be discredited, the subject banned, and the people involved deemed insane. :protarget:[/QUOTE]
Let me make a thread about why you are insane.
Because it's the topic of my thread, everyone will automatically be credited should they be on my side, the subject brought to garry, and deem you criminally insane.
[URL="http://www.ae911truth.org/"]Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth[/URL]
[URL="http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project"]Complete 9/11 Timeline [/URL]
[URL="http://firefightersfor911truth.org/"]Firefighters for 9/11 Truth[/URL]
[URL="http://www.journalof911studies.com/"]Journal of 9/11 Studies[/URL]
[URL="http://l911t.com/"]Lawyers for 9/11 Truth[/URL]
[URL="http://l911t.com/"]Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth[/URL][URL="http://l911t.com/"]
[/URL]
[URL="http://patriotsquestion911.com/"]Patriots Question 9/11[/URL]
[URL="http://pilotsfor911truth.org/"]Pilots for 9/11 Truth[/URL]
[URL="http://pl911truth.com/"]Political Leaders for
9/11 Truth[/URL][URL="http://pl911truth.com/"]
[/URL]
[URL="http://rl911truth.org/"]Religious Leaders for
9/11 Truth [/URL][URL="http://rl911truth.org/"]
[/URL]
[URL="http://stj911.org/index.html"]Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice[/URL][URL="http://stj911.org/index.html"]
[/URL]
[URL="http://physics911.net/"]Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven[/URL]
[URL="http://v911t.org/"]Veterans for 9/11 Truth[/URL][URL="http://v911t.org/"]
[/URL]
[URL="http://911truth.org/"]911Truth.org[/URL]
Take your pick.
[QUOTE=TH89;25135993]Why bother? Every time you start losing an argument in one of your 9/11 threads you abandon ship and start a new thread a day later.[/QUOTE]
Why should anyone bother posting evidence when no one will read it and still post that it is not worthy of even being read, etc... You can lead a camel to water but you can't make it drink.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.