9/11 Truth movement holds series of press conferences
333 replies, posted
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25139730]Regardless of what's been said this discussion shouldn't be derailed to focus on that.[/QUOTE]
Holy fuck, you need to pull your head out of your ass, we're STILL asking you for the things you just pigheadly won't do it.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25139721]Because real life needs some over arching plot to give it meaning to some people.
I seriously think conspiracy theorists are just people who refuse to believe that the world has no over arching plan, and that life is not like a movie at all, so they imply these stories over it to make themselves feel better.[/QUOTE]
Ah. That makes sense.
Cause, If i was MISTUH EVIL PRESIDENT BUSH/SATAN, I dont think I would have blown up two buildings, kill a bunch of innocent people trying to make a living just start a goddamn war to get some oil.
Why cant they just say [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish%E2%80%93American_War"]FUCKERS SUNK MA BOAT[/URL] instead?
[QUOTE=Zeddy;25139735]Hey, since he keeps citing bullshit sources, can I cite [B][I]BULLSHIT![/I][/B] as a source? They have an entire episode dedicated to conspiracy theories.[/QUOTE]
They're not a bad place to find good arguments generally, but they obviously leave some shit out. Still though.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25139783]They're not a bad place to find good arguments generally, but they obviously leave some shit out. Still though.[/QUOTE]
They leave stuff out on all sides though. And like with the "Second-Hand Smoking" episode, they admit when they get something wrong. They admitted that the stuff they had was incorrect.
I referenced multiple sources you guys, please be specific so I can answer your questions.
[editline]11:11PM[/editline]
like quote the post and I'll quote the source referenced
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25139818]I referenced multiple sources you guys, please be specific so I can answer your questions.
[editline]11:11PM[/editline]
like quote the post and I'll quote the source referenced[/QUOTE]
A source is not "Actors and artists for 9/11 truth", that's a discussion group, there's NO FUCKING SOURCES THERE.
This goes for almost all your sources.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25139783]They're not a bad place to find good arguments generally, but they obviously leave some shit out. Still though.[/QUOTE]
You read the unfinished post, bro.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25139818]I referenced multiple sources you guys, please be specific so I can answer your questions.
[editline]11:11PM[/editline]
like quote the post and I'll quote the source referenced[/QUOTE]
He was very specific in what he wanted a source to. More importantly, all of your sources have "Idiots for 9/11 Troof" sites. They all present speculation and twisted facts and made up claims.
Geez, apparently I wasn't clear. Quote MY post that you want the source of and I'll post it now. I'm not referring to anything previously sourced.
[editline]11:15PM[/editline]
I don't know why you keep referring to previous sources, because I wasn't.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25139867]Geez, apparently I wasn't clear. Quote MY post that you want the source of and I'll post it now. I'm not referring to anything previously sourced.
[editline]11:15PM[/editline]
I don't know why you keep referring to previous sources, because I wasn't.[/QUOTE]
How about you get all your facts straight, tie them all together and post your argument here, with a nice little thesis and everything?
Because if I hosted it on a website with the word '911' in it you'd think it was biased bullshit.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25139225]The researchers found studies done on nano-thermite as early as 2000 that showed the following:
Here's the actual picture of the nano-thermite chips mentioned in the scientific document:
[img_thumb]http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/9411/nanicq.jpg[/img_thumb]
Keep trying to make me look like a fool all you want, it won't change anything.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25139309]Their findings on the amount of material that could be ascertained from the clouds of dust from the WTC.
Also, would you consider TNT, a 'high explosive'? Well consider this:
In science talk that means that, yes, that shit is pretty powerful.[/QUOTE]
These. Sources. Now.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25139867]Geez, apparently I wasn't clear. Quote MY post that you want the source of and I'll post it now. I'm not referring to anything previously sourced.
[editline]11:15PM[/editline]
I don't know why you keep referring to previous sources, because I wasn't.[/QUOTE]
He was very specific. You just don't want to cite a source because you'll be fucking caught. We also keep referring to your previous sources because it is still relevant because you still keep making claims from them and saying they are valid.
So far I've been waiting (for some time now) for someone, anyone to bring up some sort of quote or claim of mine that they disbelieve, and I'll show them a source they haven't seen yet.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25139973]Because if I hosted it on a website with the word '911' in it you'd think it was biased bullshit.[/QUOTE]
Well, just about yes. You'd likely post shit that's biased. That's the nature of those sites, biased bullshit.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25139837]You read the unfinished post, bro.[/QUOTE]
What unfinished post? Did I somehow edit it without my own knowing, and without any visible changes? Did the post appear as if typed in real time?
[editline]06:22PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25140003]So far I've been waiting (for some time now) for someone, anyone to bring up some sort of quote or claim of mine that they disbelieve, and I'll show them a source they haven't seen yet.[/QUOTE]
Who said we necessarily disbelieve it? We just want sources.
Ohh, and one more thing. [B]WE HAVE ASKED FOR SOURCES ON SPECIFIC ITEMS.[/B]
[QUOTE=Zeddy;25140069]What unfinished post? Did I somehow edit it without my own knowing, and without any visible changes? Did the post appear as if typed in real time?[/QUOTE]
Through his mystifing system of posting and replies, he meant I quoted a post before he was done with it changing what he meant by it.
Still haven't gotten any sources. :sigh:
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25140095]Through his mystifing system of posting and replies, he meant I quoted a post before he was done with it changing what he meant by it.[/QUOTE]
Then why did he quote your post in which you were responding to me?
[QUOTE=ketchup;25139977]These. Sources. Now.[/QUOTE]
Okay.
[URL="https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/244137.pdf"]Characterization of the compound described in the post.[/URL]
[URL="http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4/"]More thermite findings.[/URL]
Anything else while I'm at it?
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25139644][URL="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=wtc+building+structure"]Let me google that for you.[/URL][/QUOTE]
you're a fucking moron
[QUOTE=Zeddy;25140112]Then why did he quote your post in which you were responding to me?[/QUOTE]
:iiam:
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25140184]:iiam:[/QUOTE]
Oh that... simple misquote. Don't get off topic now, I posted your sources.
We've had three threads about this already, he's lost every single one. The news in the OP has nothing new or nothing special. Just move along people, nothing to see here.
Maybe when they release some new evidence, we might discuss it. Lets not tread over the same things again (Thermite and nano-thermite being one of them)
Don't argue with him.
Don't respond to him.
We've done it all before, and he won't see our side of it. Ever. Just don't waste your life or your time.
Way to join the discussion 5 pages late danger. Just as uninformed about the subject matter you're commenting upon as usual I see.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25140265]Way to join the discussion 5 pages late danger. Just as uninformed about the subject matter you're commenting upon as usual I see.[/QUOTE]
Do you call everyone uninformed just because they disagree with you?
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25140265]Way to join the discussion 5 pages late danger. Just as uninformed about the subject matter you're commenting upon as usual I see.[/QUOTE]
Disagreeing with you =/= being uninformed. He's better informed than you because you think a lot of the bullshit we constantly discredit is valid after being discredited.
[QUOTE=MrEndangered;25140235]We've had three threads about this already, he's lost every single one. The news in the OP has nothing new or nothing special. Just move along people, nothing to see here.
Maybe when they release some new evidence, we might discuss it. Lets not tread over the same things again (Thermite and nano-thermite being one of them)
Don't argue with him.
Don't respond to him.
We've done it all before, and he won't see our side of it. Ever. Just don't waste your life or your time.[/QUOTE]
[quote]You speak as though the conclusion of every facepunch debate is infallible fact. When, in the real world, science works differently. For example; we used to be told that the earth was in fact, flat. Scientists spoke out against this flat out falsehood, but couldn't be proved certifiable until they were able to gather more evidence, reassert their claims, and convince people, slowly but surely, that their conclusion was the correct one (base on their evidence gathered). Now I'm not doing anyone an injustice by posting these discussions, but quite frankly it gets disheartening to continue replying once it has reached a point of literally nothing but flame-to-flame responses. That's when I re-gather evidence, reassert my point, and watch how it plays out.[/quote]
Yes he does that alot. Just ignore it. I, however, am off to look at pictures of naked ladies instead of spending several more hours arguing in a 9/11 thread.
I suggest you all do the same.
Oh, and by the way: You have no new evidence to refute with, it's a press release not a wikileak of scientific journals. Don't try to fool anyone.
Thermite,
[B]BILLIONS OF TONS OF IT[/B]
suddenly i am credible and not a total jack ass.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.