Massive Muslim inbreeding over 14,000 years may have ruined gene pool - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Lambeth;25750082]The Habsburgs! [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_II_of_Spain[/url][/QUOTE] Derp [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/Juan_de_Miranda_Carreno_002.jpg[/img]

laughing @ teens saying a psych who has his doctorate is "not qualified" to talk about genetics -- except he hardly did and what he did say doesn't require much education in the field evidence doesn't need to be presented as anyone who knows anything about Muslim culture would know that the inbreeding the doctor mentions is a way of life in the middle east as part of their religion it's something filed under common knowledge the rest of what he said is almost entirely from a psychology standpoint and is pretty true whether you think he's racist or not..

[QUOTE=Soda;25782616]the inbreeding the doctor mentions is a way of life in the middle east as part of their religion[/QUOTE] you're a bloody psychopath

[QUOTE=thisispain;25782633]you're a bloody psychopath[/QUOTE] No he's not, he's telling the unfortunate truth.

i've said it before, believing this goes completely against scientific fact believing this is akin to believing in intelligent design except it has the added ugliness of bigotry, so it adds itself up to a bigoted, [b]retarded[/b], world view anyone who does not repudiate this will have utterly convinced me of idiocy where else but the internet would ridiculous postulates like these given legitimacy, just because you are anonymous, it does not mean you are automatically holding valid opinions

[QUOTE=Soda;25782616]laughing @ teens saying a psych who has his doctorate is "not qualified" to talk about genetics -- except he hardly did and what he did say doesn't require much education in the field evidence doesn't need to be presented as anyone who knows anything about Muslim culture would know that the inbreeding the doctor mentions is a way of life in the middle east as part of their religion it's something filed under common knowledge the rest of what he said is almost entirely from a psychology standpoint and is pretty true whether you think he's racist or not..[/QUOTE] Science should always strive to be objective, unlike Sennels' work, which can hardly be described as unbiased, especially on the matter at hand, considering he is a member of the Danish People's party.

[QUOTE=Number-41;25782229]Derp [img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/Juan_de_Miranda_Carreno_002.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] Holy ass I thought that was a woman. I'll also add that I know it to be a relatively common custom for Muslims and other people in Afghanistan and Pakistan to marry their first and second cousins, Though I don't think that has any of the implications this guy would like it too.

[QUOTE=Taishu;25781842]It's interesting to note that Nicolai Sennels is a member of Danish People's party, the extreme right-winged, semi nazi party, known for being ridiculous and racist. Most recently they wanted to make it illegal for Arabs to watch Arabic television in Denmark.[/QUOTE] It's funny that your retarded oxymoron actually accurately portrays the party: extreme right-wing, hmm okay, semi Nazi, oh I understand you mean not right-wing at all because they support social programs and the nordic model. Funny that people don't seem to understand that the Nazis were extreme leftists, but also nationalists. You find it appropriate to label the Danes Nazis because they care about their people and their culture? [editline]1st November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Novistador;25783560]Holy ass I thought that was a woman. I'll also add that I know it to be a relatively common custom for Muslims and other people in Afghanistan and Pakistan to marry their first and second cousins, Though I don't think that has any of the implications this guy would like it too.[/QUOTE] [img]http://steadyoffload.com:8080/T43C1WX2KF.aHR0cDovL3RoZXkubWlzbGVkLnVzL3dwL3dwLWNvbnRlbnQvdXBsb2Fkcy8yMDA3LzA4L2RlbGl2ZXJhbmNlLW1pZ2h0eS1wdXJ0eS1tb3V0aC5qcGVn....[/img]

[QUOTE=Ecarnacion;25783958]It's funny that your retarded oxymoron actually accurately portrays the party: extreme right-wing, hmm okay, semi Nazi, oh I understand you mean not right-wing at all because they support social programs and the nordic model. Funny that people don't seem to understand that the Nazis were extreme leftists, but also nationalists. You find it appropriate to label the Danes Nazis because they care about their people and their culture[/QUOTE] Yeah, I really don't get how people can call right-wingers Nazis, when Nazi is short for National Socialist.

[QUOTE=BurnEmDown;25784209]Yeah, I really don't get how people can call right-wingers Nazis, when Nazi is short for National Socialist.[/QUOTE] Same way the democratic-republic of the Congo is a democratic-republic? Hitler used socialism as a way to get the votes of the working class, who made up pretty much most of the population. [editline]1st November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Ecarnacion;25783958] Funny that people don't seem to understand that the Nazis were extreme leftists, but also nationalists. You find it appropriate to label the Danes Nazis because they care about their people and their culture?[/QUOTE] lol, i didn't know propping up large corporations and having an extremist conservative social system was Leftist.

[QUOTE=Ecarnacion;25783958]It's funny that your retarded oxymoron actually accurately portrays the party: extreme right-wing, hmm okay, semi Nazi, oh I understand you mean not right-wing at all because they support social programs and the nordic model.[/QUOTE] Right-winged in the authoritarian and conservative sense. Fact is they make out a large part of the right wing here in Denmark, and have always been known as an extreme right-winged party. I apologize for any misunderstandings that might've caused. Also the German Nazis, which I guess you're referring to, were hardly actual socialists. [QUOTE=Ecarnacion;25783958]Funny that people don't seem to understand that the Nazis were extreme leftists, but also nationalists. You find it appropriate to label the Danes Nazis because they care about their people and their culture?[/QUOTE] I am Danish, and I do care about my people and my culture, it's just that I don't agree with the Danish People's party. I find them to be not only racist and hypocritical, but also their politics are a joke. Often they are based on last week's tabloid headlines. To call them populist would be an understatement.

[QUOTE=Warhol;25784309]Same way the democratic-republic of the Congo is a democratic-republic? Hitler used socialism as a way to get the votes of the working class, who made up pretty much most of the population.[/QUOTE] What about all the social improvements he did in 33', 34' and 35'?

[QUOTE=Ecarnacion;25783958]It's funny that your retarded oxymoron actually accurately portrays the party: extreme right-wing, hmm okay, semi Nazi, oh I understand you mean not right-wing at all because they support social programs and the nordic model. Funny that people don't seem to understand that [b]the Nazis were extreme leftists[/b], but also nationalists. You find it appropriate to label the Danes Nazis because they care about their people and their culture? [/QUOTE] Stop that

[QUOTE=BurnEmDown;25784811]What about all the social improvements he did in 33', 34' and 35'?[/QUOTE] Hitler's idea that benefits should only come to those who are racially pure, I would say, is directly contradictory to proper socialism. He also supported privatization. Hitler was more a populist than a socialist. He only used the term to gain popularity with the working class.

[QUOTE=Ecarnacion;25783958]It's funny that your retarded oxymoron actually accurately portrays the party: extreme right-wing, hmm okay, semi Nazi, oh I understand you mean not right-wing at all because they support social programs and the nordic model. Funny that people don't seem to understand that the[B] Nazis were extreme leftists[/B], but also nationalists. You find it appropriate to label the Danes Nazis because they care about their people and their culture? [editline]1st November 2010[/editline] [img_thumb]http://steadyoffload.com:8080/T43C1WX2KF.aHR0cDovL3RoZXkubWlzbGVkLnVzL3dwL3dwLWNvbnRlbnQvdXBsb2Fkcy8yMDA3LzA4L2RlbGl2ZXJhbmNlLW1pZ2h0eS1wdXJ0eS1tb3V0aC5qcGVn....[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] No, stop right there.

[QUOTE=yawmwen;25750254]In fact inbreeding can actually strengthen the gene pool.[/QUOTE] Oh right, that's why its outlawed.

[QUOTE=Taishu;25784911]Hitler's idea that benefits should only come to those who are racially pure, I would say, is directly contradictory to proper socialism.[/QUOTE] Which is why his party isn't only socialist, but also nationalist.

[QUOTE=Ecarnacion;25783958]It's funny that your retarded oxymoron actually accurately portrays the party: extreme right-wing, hmm okay, semi Nazi, oh I understand you mean not right-wing at all because they support social programs and the nordic model. Funny that people don't seem to understand that the Nazis were extreme leftists, but also nationalists. You find it appropriate to label the Danes Nazis because they care about their people and their culture?[/QUOTE] [img]http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:KRfe3P_o5_nu2M:http://i166.photobucket.com/albums/u83/joseph5672003/full_retard.jpg&t=1[/img]

[QUOTE=Ecarnacion;25783958]It's funny that your retarded oxymoron actually accurately portrays the party: extreme right-wing, hmm okay, semi Nazi, oh I understand you mean not right-wing at all because they support social programs and the nordic model. Funny that people don't seem to understand that the [B]Nazis were extreme leftists[/B], but also nationalists. You find it appropriate to label the Danes Nazis because they care about their people and their culture? [editline]1st November 2010[/editline] [/QUOTE] Are you fucking serious? I know you're a right-winger and all but holy shit.

Communism: We own your business and run it in line with the goals of the state; you have no say Nazism: You own our business and run it in line with the goals of the state; you have no say Supposed 'privatization' of big business was still heavily regulated by the National Socialist [B]German Workers' Party[/B]. You can't ignore their economic policies because they were also social dickheads. [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("Karskin" - TH89))[/highlight]

Wait, didn't this happen to one branch of Jews? Ashkenazi I think?

[QUOTE=JDK721v5;25785578][img_thumb]http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:KRfe3P_o5_nu2M:http://i166.photobucket.com/albums/u83/joseph5672003/full_retard.jpg&t=1[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] You gonna get a [img]http://biomedme.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/banana.jpg[/img] for an image macro!

[QUOTE=BurnEmDown;25784811]What about all the social improvements he did in 33', 34' and 35'?[/QUOTE] Social improvements to [b]the Aryan people[/b] you forgot that little thing. [editline]1st November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=BurnEmDown;25785186]Which is why his party isn't only socialist, but also nationalist.[/QUOTE] Nationalism and socialism goes together like diversified racism. It's an oxymoron. like you, you're an oxymoron. Only minus the oxy and full emphasis on the latter.

[QUOTE=Warhol;25785932]Social improvements to [b]the Aryan people[/b] you forgot that little thing.[/QUOTE] Socialist policies don't suddenly become right-wing when they are not pluralist

[QUOTE=Ecarnacion;25785690]Communism: We own your business and run it in line with the goals of the state; you have no say Nazism: You own our business and run it in line with the goals of the state; you have no say Supposed 'privatization' of big business was still heavily regulated by the National Socialist [B]German Workers' Party[/B]. You can't ignore their economic policies because they were also social dickheads.[/QUOTE] That's... Not communism at all lol

[QUOTE=BurnEmDown;25784209]Yeah, I really don't get how people can call right-wingers Nazis, when Nazi is short for National Socialist.[/QUOTE] Cause names don't mean shit. The name nazi stood for Nationalist socialist german workers party, they were as fascist as fascist can be.

[QUOTE=BurnEmDown;25785186]Which is why his party isn't only socialist, but also nationalist.[/QUOTE] But that is contradictory. Like communistic capitalism. Nazism is socialist in name only. Besides that doesn't cover other points, such as Hitler supporting privatization, that major corporations flourished under his rule, the disbandment and criminalization of unions and the arrest of many of the country's socialists.

How is a national socialist party an oxymoron? It's socialist but only for the nation, anyone outside of the nation is considered not part of society and thus isn't treated the same way others do. Just note that obviously I don't support this policy, but saying the Nazis weren't socialist is just silly. Yes, they did arrest socialists, but they were more communist than socialists, and as you said yourself, being a socialist is much different to being a national socialist. I don't see why you care so much anyway, it's not like if the Nazis were on the left, then that means everyone else on the left is a Nazi. The left and right can mean a lot of different things for different countries at different times, do you think that a person on the left in Britain 80 years ago would have roughly the same views a person in the US from the left has today? Maybe only the core, but not the rest. Anyway, the Nazi party was messed up, they rejected both democracy and communism, and said that capitalism was the Jews' way of stealing money from the Germans, economically they were a mix of all of the political spectrum but there's no denying that their internal actions in Germany's economy were socialist in nature. It's their political agenda which is far more to the right.

Islam hasn't been around for 14,000 years. You're such a dummy OP.

King Tut was a genetically fucked up human being and look what he did for the Egyptians before he died.