North Korea 'giving nuclear material to Iran, Syria' - Polidicks

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26043759]So what? Let them trade if they wish. Hurr durr, we get nuclear technology but they can't![/QUOTE] Iran is led by an insane anti-Semite who refuses to acknowledge that the Holocaust is a historical event that actually occurred. Who knows what the fuck he'll do if he actually gets his hands on nuclear weapons.

[QUOTE=kidwithsword;26046339]Iran is led by an insane anti-Semite who refuses to acknowledge that the Holocaust is a historical event that actually occurred. Who knows what the fuck he'll do if he actually gets his hands on nuclear weapons.[/QUOTE] Iran may be led by a far-right idiot, but it's still multi party, and he can't do shit with nuclear weapons, the UN will be on his ass.

[QUOTE=kidwithsword;26046339]Iran is led by an insane anti-Semite who refuses to acknowledge that the Holocaust is a historical event that actually occurred. Who knows what the fuck he'll do if he actually gets his hands on nuclear weapons.[/QUOTE] I think you need to re-listen the parts about the Holocaust. As far as I have heard its like both sided should be heard and not one. And he will use it for those pretty cars that run on electricity or for city's.

[QUOTE=kidwithsword;26046339]Iran is led by an insane anti-Semite who refuses to acknowledge that the Holocaust is a historical event that actually occurred. Who knows what the fuck he'll do if he actually gets his hands on nuclear weapons.[/QUOTE] Isn't North Korea led by a similar man?

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26043759]So what? Let them trade if they wish. Hurr durr, we get nuclear technology but they can't![/QUOTE] Uhm, we don't let them have it because they are about as sane and stable as France during its revolution back in the 1790's-1813 or whatever [editline]13th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=kidwithsword;26046339]Iran is led by an insane anti-Semite who refuses to acknowledge that the Holocaust is a historical event that actually occurred. Who knows what the fuck he'll do if he actually gets his hands on nuclear weapons.[/QUOTE] I don't think such an opinion is enough of a reason to think they're insane

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26043759]So what? Let them trade if they wish. Hurr durr, we get nuclear technology but they can't![/QUOTE] Hurr durr, let's give convicted felons guns because they should he equal like everyone else.

[QUOTE=Amplar;26047152]Hurr durr, let's give convicted felons guns because they should he equal like everyone else.[/QUOTE] Syria and Iran are not "felons". Burma is pretty bad, but how do we actually know that they are being given ballistic equipment? The article says "ballistic missile-realted".

I recall the Ayatollah issuing a fatwa that Nuclear Weapons are forbidden, according to the Sharia. I really doubt that they would do anything stupid with the materials. Them owning nukes is just propaganda by the US to eliminate sympathizers/protesters when we invade them.

See? were not all that bad

[QUOTE=Kim_Jong_il;26049932]See? were not all that bad[/QUOTE] I agree. Thanks for the stuff bro. :cheers:

korea pisses someone off what a fucking surprise

[QUOTE=CodeMonkey3;26045212]Can we invade them now?[/QUOTE] Sorry but coalition forces are already busy invading your mum :colbert:

[QUOTE=Coffee;26043799]Whoop-de-do, nobody's that stupid to use nuclear weapons.[/QUOTE] Nobody is afraid of an actual nuclear bomb being launched. What people [b]are[/b] afraid of is the use of some proxy, such as a terrorist organization, to use these bombs.

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26043759]So what? Let them trade if they wish. Hurr durr, we get nuclear technology but they can't![/QUOTE] Please be joking.

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26045911]syria and iran are multi-party states ok syria has good international relations[/QUOTE] I should have said state not states because I meant NK, not the other 3.

[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;26055183]I should have said state not states because I meant NK, not the other 3.[/QUOTE] North Korea may be bad, but they should be able to trade just like everyone else. [QUOTE=Dr. Freeman;26053924]Please be joking.[/QUOTE] I'm not.

[QUOTE=DanTehMan;26043902]I'm trying to think of a recent event where the UN HAS actually stepped in, but I can't think of one. What are they good for?[/QUOTE] World's number 1 exporter of harshly worded letters [editline]14th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26045498]Yes, the US isn't a fan of Iran because the US is sucking Israel's cock.[/QUOTE] Also because Iran was sending weapons and supplies to insurgents in Iraq.

[QUOTE=Ridge;26057642] Also because Iran was sending weapons and supplies to insurgents in Iraq.[/QUOTE] That's a company, not the government. :saddowns:

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26058704]That's a company, not the government. :saddowns:[/QUOTE] It shows how people here don't read past the title. [editline]14th November 2010[/editline] MSNBC still has my respect though, just a extremely biased anti-Iran writer probably.

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26058704]That's a company, not the government. :saddowns:[/QUOTE] No, a company was offering a price on the heads of US soldiers in Afghanistan... [url]http://articles.cnn.com/2007-04-11/world/iraq.main_1_iranian-revolutionary-guard-quds-force-sunni-insurgents?_s=PM:WORLD[/url]

[QUOTE=Ridge;26059357]No, a company was offering a price on the heads of US soldiers in Afghanistan... [url]http://articles.cnn.com/2007-04-11/world/iraq.main_1_iranian-revolutionary-guard-quds-force-sunni-insurgents?_s=PM:WORLD[/url][/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfLRc1BjN20[/media] [editline]14th November 2010[/editline] Heads up before you open the YouTube; it's your favorite guy.

Sharing is caring

[QUOTE=starpluck;26060053][media][URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfLRc1BjN20[/URL][/media] [editline]14th November 2010[/editline] Heads up before you open the YouTube; it's your favorite guy.[/QUOTE] Where is Olbermann's source about it not being Iranian?

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26057073]North Korea may be bad, but they should be able to trade just like everyone else. I'm not.[/QUOTE] :smithicide: [editline]14th November 2010[/editline] I'm getting there. Losing hope in humanity, one post at a time.

While Syria is a bit worrying, Iran, meh.

[QUOTE=Zambies!;26064255]While Syria is a bit worrying, Iran, meh.[/QUOTE] And why the fuck is Syria worrying? Is it because they are beyond the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil]asses of evil[/url]?

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26057073]North Korea may be bad, but they should be able to trade just like everyone else. [/QUOTE] wat

[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;26065197]wat[/QUOTE] North Korea is under a brutal dictatorship, and the people are oppressed, but if they can't trade how will they get better? Also, NK being bad is somewhat exaggerated. It's in the medium human development range.

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26064524]And why the fuck is Syria worrying? Is it because they are beyond the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil]asses of evil[/url]?[/QUOTE] Hypothetical conflict Syria uses low grade nuclear material to create low yield nuclear weapons Syria has a major hatred of Israel Declares war on Israel Mutual defense of Israel by the United States. Equals Low yield exchange, fucking up the middle east for potentially half a century.

[QUOTE=Zambies!;26065529]Hypothetical conflict Syria uses low grade nuclear material to create low yield nuclear weapons Syria has a major hatred of Israel Declares war on Israel Mutual defense of Israel by the United States. Equals Low yield exchange, fucking up the middle east for potentially half a century.[/QUOTE] These probably aren't nuclear weapons If I am correct, and this is just uranium, it's probably lowly-enriched and thus cannot be used for weapons Syria and Israel may be hostile, but it's not as bad as other Arab countries (i.e. Israel trades apples with them) A war wouldn't happen Nuclear weapons would never be fired, the UN would intervene before that could happen