North Korea 'giving nuclear material to Iran, Syria' - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Nahyan;26047745]I recall the Ayatollah issuing a fatwa that Nuclear Material is forbidden, according to the Sharia. I really doubt that they would do anything stupid with the materials. Them owning nukes is just propaganda by the US to eliminate sympathizers/protesters when we invade them.[/QUOTE] Your guys are going to fail so bad when they invade. [editline]15th November 2010[/editline] [img]http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/3671/problemwest.png[/img]

[QUOTE=A Dead Guy;26081637]I don't care about Iran getting civilian nuclear power, nor did I imply that it was a military threat. But you can't exactly say that he didn't really mean it-this was obviously a well thought provocation. He knew Israel and some of the western world would jump on it as soon as they see it, and then he would have no problem to make them look like complete dumbasses. It's political trolling.[/QUOTE] [quote] Wishing that a state will be wiped off of existence is still wrong,[B] it still smells of severe hatred and it even [I]sounds a little threatening.[/I][/B] Why not "cease from doing wrong to the Palestinian people"? Why not "mend it's ways and stop the illegal settlements"? Why not "stop being such dicks"? He could have said anything, [B]anything[/B] and yet he chose words that [B]slightly imply of a threat.[/B] Why? [/quote] You 'implied' military threat. Provocation my ass.

[QUOTE=Random94;26081555]No he is a shia (his father was a shia cleric also), also as i said if the iranians hated israel they wouldnt have[B] acepted military aid from them in the 80s[/B][/QUOTE] LOL That was because the fucking dictator US Puppet SHAH was in power. Before the Islamic Revolution. [editline] 2:00 AM [/editline] And yes, he was a Jew. [url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/6256173/Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad-revealed-to-have-Jewish-past.html[/url]

[QUOTE=RayDark;26081702]You 'implied' military threat. Provocation my ass.[/QUOTE] Just because it's a "threat" doesn't mean it's a military one, nor does it actually means business. If he really didn't want to start a provocation, he wouldn't have used these words.

[QUOTE=A Dead Guy;26081637]I don't care about Iran getting civilian nuclear power, nor did I imply that it was a military threat. But you can't exactly say that he didn't really mean it-this was obviously a well thought provocation. He knew Israel and some of the western world would jump on it as soon as they see it, and then he would have no problem to make them look like complete dumbasses. It's political trolling.[/QUOTE] He wants a regime change in Israel just like Soviet Union. Stop trying to demonize over exaggerate it into something he didn't say. Nations all the time call for a regime change in Iran. No biggie.

[QUOTE=A Dead Guy;26081784]Just because it's a "threat" doesn't mean it's a military one, nor does it actually means business. If he really didn't want to start a provocation, he wouldn't have used these words.[/QUOTE] Those words don't mean shit. And there you go, it 'doesn't actually mean business', so therefore he was not provoking them.

[QUOTE=starpluck;26081826]He wants a regime change in Israel just like Soviet Union. Stop trying to demonize over exaggerate it into something he didn't say. Nations all the time call for a regime change in Iran. No biggie.[/QUOTE] They don't say "Iran as it is today should be wiped off the history books/sands of time". You know why? because that could actually cause a provocation. [editline]15th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=RayDark;26081828]Those words don't mean shit. And there you go, it 'doesn't actually mean business', so therefore he was not provoking them.[/QUOTE] Do you even understand what I'm saying? His intention was not to threaten Israel the slightest, but to make them comment in a way that would make them look stupid.

[QUOTE=A Dead Guy;26081882][B]They don't say "Iran as it is today should be wiped off the history books/sands of time". You know why? because that could actually cause a provocation.[/B] [editline]15th November 2010[/editline] Do you even understand what I'm saying? His intention was not to threaten Israel the slightest, but to make them comment in a way that would make them look stupid.[/QUOTE] Yeah, instead they sanction them. No, that wasn't his fucking intention! Stop making his comment out as satanic speech, he wanted the zionists out. Which will probably never happen.

[QUOTE=A Dead Guy;26081882]They don't say "Iran as it is today should be wiped off the history books/sands of time". You know why? because that could actually cause a provocation. [/QUOTE] Nor did Iran say anything like that either so why use such an example? A reminder! He called for the regime occupying Jerusalem to wiped out like the Soviet Union. He didn't say ISRAEL itself should be wiped from the history books. That's called calling for a regime change, holy shit. Seriously, you're trying to find every possible way to link him as some demon. Just give up

Jesus fuck we had to tell you three times.

[QUOTE=RayDark;26082044]Jesus fuck we had to tell you three times.[/QUOTE] He's a dead guy; of course he'll never understand.

inb4 World war 3

Actually they could be secret allies as i said before, Israel wants to get rid of the Palestinians and get their land while Iran wants eastern Iraq (which happens to have Arab shia, which are all loyal to iran) under their control and the rest of the Arab world under their influence, so Iran will threaten israel so the west gives israel support which therefore makes it control the west bank while it keeps killing palistinians so Arab muslims can sympathize with iran and achieve their goals over the region.

[QUOTE=Da Jester;26081400]I thought Karl Marx was supposed to be intelligent.[/QUOTE] I'm not Karl Marx, I'm Marl Karx.

It's fairly obvious that Iran and Ahmadinejad are waging a proxy war against Israel through organisations such as Hamas. You can't seriously be telling me that Iran is completely and non-provocatively diplomatic in its stance against Israel, and Ahmadinejad does not bear any trace of hostility or anti-Semitism. Frankly, I don't care for the technical reports of his exact wording - it is blatantly obvious that supports the destruction of Israel through unjustified means.

Response from Kim_Jong_il was inevitable in this thread. Personally I think Iran's leader is a moron that believes that a holocaust will come. I find it ironic that he might cause it..

[QUOTE=Dr_Funk;26092867]It's fairly obvious that Iran and Ahmadinejad are waging a proxy war against Israel through organisations such as Hamas. You can't seriously be telling me that Iran is completely and non-provocatively diplomatic in its stance against Israel, and Ahmadinejad does not bear any trace of hostility or anti-Semitism. Frankly, I don't care for the technical reports of his exact wording - it is blatantly obvious that supports the destruction of Israel through unjustified means.[/QUOTE] Yup. We're trying to say Iran is fully peacefully diplomatic and in no way provocative or hostile to other nations- Oh wait. No nation is peacefully diplomatic and non-hostile to other nations.

[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;26091676]I'm not Karl Marx, I'm Marl Karx.[/QUOTE] Karl Marx was a drunkard and a psuedo-intellectual who never did anything but mooch of Friedrich Engels and his own wife. And then he claimed Engels work as his own. EDIT: In other words an archetypical communist.

[QUOTE=Dr_Funk;26092867]it is blatantly obvious that supports the destruction of Israel through unjustified means.[/QUOTE] To a paranoid person, maybe. ie you [editline]16th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26095646]Karl Marx was a drunkard and a psuedo-intellectual who never did anything but mooch of Friedrich Engels and his own wife. And then he claimed Engels work as his own. EDIT: In other words an archetypical communist.[/QUOTE] Now back to Reality. [editline]16th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Saphirx;26094878]Response from Kim_Jong_il was inevitable in this thread. Personally I think I am moron [/QUOTE] fixed

[QUOTE=Warhol;26097068]To a paranoid person, maybe. ie you [editline]16th November 2010[/editline] Now back to Reality. [editline]16th November 2010[/editline] fixed[/QUOTE] Flame much? But seriously, Gentelmanne was right on the money. Back to reality? Do your research before saying shit like that.

I have never heard of Karl Marx being a heavy alcoholic and Friedrich Engels and Marx were fucking political authors who worked together. If you read the prefaces to the communist manifesto, which I doubt you even knew existed, you would see Engels has nothing but nice words for Marx. They worked together. I didn't know completely making shit up was reality. Thanks Faze!

[QUOTE=Warhol;26097180]I have never heard of Karl Marx being a heavy alcoholic and Friedrich Engels and Marx were fucking political authors who worked together. If you read the prefaces to the communist manifesto, which I doubt you even knew existed, you would see Engels has nothing but nice words for Marx. They worked together. I didn't know completely making shit up was reality. Thanks Faze![/QUOTE] I know what the fucking Communist Manifesto is, I'm not 11 years old.

could have fooled me

Wait aren't the Russians supposed to be in charge of providing Iran with their uranium? So isnt this technically illegal?

[QUOTE=P1X3L N1NJA;26099184]Wait aren't the Russians supposed to be in charge of providing Iran with their uranium? So isnt this technically illegal?[/QUOTE] That's never stopped anyone before.

[QUOTE=starpluck;26095308]Yup. We're trying to say Iran is fully peacefully diplomatic and in no way provocative or hostile to other nations- Oh wait. No nation is peacefully diplomatic and non-hostile to other nations.[/QUOTE] Where I come from, we don't arm bloody terrorist groups to attack the civilians of foreign countries. But that's just me.

[QUOTE=Dr_Funk;26108830]Where I come from, we don't arm bloody terrorist groups to attack the civilians of foreign countries. But that's just me.[/QUOTE] Well jeez, anything would sound bad when you phrase it like that.

[QUOTE=faze;26079469]What isn't American controlled nowadays?[/QUOTE] China

[QUOTE=Dr_Funk;26108830]Where I come from, we don't arm bloody terrorist groups to attack the civilians of foreign countries. But that's just me.[/QUOTE] Interesting. So I assume you aren't American then.

[QUOTE=Dr_Funk;26108830]Where I come from, we don't arm bloody terrorist groups to attack the civilians of foreign countries. But that's just me.[/QUOTE] So you're not Israeli? :smug: